Practical Compliance Guideline
Transfer pricing issues related to inbound distribution arrangements
This practice statement is being updated and moderated for consistency with the APA Review recommendations. During the interim period where current ATO public guidance materials are being updated, any inconsistencies will be disregarded and the APA Review recommendations will be applied (available at Findings report APA program review). Further guidance can be obtained by emailing email@example.com, if required.There is a Compendium for this document: PCG 2019/1EC .
|Table of Contents||Paragraph|
|What this Guideline is about|
|Structure of this Guideline|
|Date of effect|
|Our compliance approach|
|How we risk assess your inbound distribution arrangements|
|Activities that incrementally generate value|
|The risk assessment framework|
|How to increase certainty through the advance pricing arrangement program|
|Transitioning existing arrangements to the low risk zone|
|Who to contact|
|SCHEDULE 1 - GENERAL DISTRIBUTORS|
|SCHEDULE 2 - LIFE SCIENCE|
|SCHEDULE 3 - INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY|
|SCHEDULE 4 - MOTOR VEHICLES|
Relying on this Guideline
This Practical Compliance Guideline sets out a practical administration approach to assist taxpayers in complying with relevant tax laws. Provided you follow this Guideline in good faith, the Commissioner will administer the law in accordance with this approach.
What this Guideline is about
- distributing goods purchased from related foreign entities for resale, and
- distributing digital products or services where the intellectual property in those products or services is owned by related foreign entities.
3. This Guideline applies to inbound distribution arrangements of any scale. Where you are an inbound distributor and you choose to adopt the distributor simplified transfer pricing record keeping option in Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2017/2 Simplified transfer pricing record keeping options, this Guideline will not apply and instead we will follow the compliance approach set out in PCG 2017/2.
4. We use the framework in this Guideline to assess the transfer pricing risk of inbound distribution arrangements and tailor our engagement with you. Where this Guideline applies, we rate the transfer pricing risk of your inbound distribution arrangements having regard to a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors.
5. If we rate your inbound distribution arrangements as having a low transfer pricing risk, you can expect that we will generally not apply compliance resources to review the transfer pricing outcomes of your arrangements. However, if your inbound distribution arrangements fall outside the low transfer pricing risk category, you can expect us to monitor, test and/or verify the transfer pricing outcomes of your arrangements. The higher the risk rating, the more likely we are to review your arrangements as a matter of priority.
6. This Guideline is limited to the transfer pricing risks associated with inbound distribution arrangements. It does not affect our compliance approach to other tax issues that might arise in connection with your inbound distribution arrangements (for example, the existence of withholding tax obligations or the application of the general anti-avoidance rule in Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936). If we consider that your inbound distribution arrangements pose a risk under other tax provisions, we will apply compliance resources to review your arrangements.
7. This Guideline does not limit the operation of the law. The information provided in this Guideline does not replace, alter or affect our interpretation of the law in any way. It does not relieve you of your legal obligation to comply with all relevant tax laws, or create any safe harbour administrative concessions.
8. Having a low risk rating under this Guideline does not necessarily mean that your transfer pricing outcomes are correct or that you have a reasonably arguable position. Equally, having a high risk rating under this Guideline does not necessarily mean that your inbound distribution arrangements fail to comply with Australia's transfer pricing rules. Having regard to your particular circumstances, we may accept that your transfer pricing outcomes are reasonable.
9. You should not rely on the profit markers to determine arm's length conditions. This Guideline does not replace an appropriate comparability analysis and proper application of the transfer pricing obligations under the law.
- assess the transfer pricing risk of your inbound distribution arrangements
- understand the compliance approach we are likely to adopt given the transfer pricing risk profile of your inbound distribution arrangements
- work with us to mitigate the transfer pricing risk of your inbound distribution arrangements and be confident you have reduced your risk exposure, and
- understand the type of analysis we use when assessing the transfer pricing risk of your inbound distribution arrangements.
Structure of this Guideline
- the main body sets out general principles relevant to our framework for assessing transfer pricing risk and applying compliance resources to inbound distribution arrangements to which the Guideline applies, and
- the schedules set out quantitative and qualitative indicators relevant to distributors generally or based on their industry sector, including those that operate in the life science, information and communication technology (ICT) and motor vehicle industries.
Date of effect
14. The use and application of this Guideline will be under continuous review over the next three years. Any revisions to improve the Guideline will be made at the end of the review period or on an 'as necessary' basis. We will undertake consultation in relation to proposed material changes.
15. We consider you to be an inbound distributor if your business predominantly involves the distribution of goods purchased from related foreign entities for resale, or the distribution of digital products or services where the intellectual property in those products or services is owned by related foreign entities.
16. For the purposes of our risk assessment framework, an inbound distributor is an intermediary between the producer of a good and another entity in the distribution channel or supply chain. A distributor earns a gross profit from the difference between the price at which they sell the good, and the price which they pay. A distributor will typically incur various selling and administrative costs that must be covered by this gross profit in order for it to make a net profit.
17. In relation to the distribution of digital products and services, an inbound distributor is an intermediary between the intellectual property owner and the customer or end user of the digital product or service. We consider you to be an inbound distributor irrespective of whether you distribute digital products or services by granting rights to end users directly, or by facilitating the grant of rights to end users by related foreign entities.
18. Inbound distributors include entities that sell to retailers, merchants, contractors or industrial, institutional or commercial users. Their focus is on selling business to business, rather than to household consumers. An inbound distributor may have some retail operation but their primary sales channel is not their own retail activity.
19. Inbound distributors play an important role as a value-adding link between foreign entity suppliers and customers. Inbound distributors seek to find and match suppliers' capabilities with customers' buying preferences. In the case of goods, an inbound distributor will commonly purchase in mass quantity and then on-sell the goods in smaller orders to its customers. The inbound distributor may also acquire goods from more than one supplier, and match its sales to the specifications and volumes requested by customers. In the case of digital products and services, an inbound distributor may seek to identify the most appropriate digital products or services for the end user by understanding the end user's business, technical needs and specifications. This may involve the inbound distributor offering bespoke or customised digital products or services to the end user.
20. Inbound distributors may pass important information in both directions. This may include information from suppliers regarding product benefits, changes to the product line-up, expected pricing and technical support. It may also include information from customers about their preferences, demand expectations and competitors.
21. The role of an inbound distributor can include a range of functions that support the primary activity of distribution. Many of these functions will be associated with sales, after sales support, procurement and administration. An inbound distributor may also undertake functions involving transportation, warehousing, inventory management and regulatory matters. The specific nature and combination of these functions will be unique to the inbound distributor's business.
22. The nature of an inbound distributor's sales function will vary depending on a range of matters including the nature of the product, the nature of the customers and the business strategies adopted by the inbound distributor. The sales function may include activities such as support for promotional efforts, product information, technical support, relationship building and order processing. It is usually important for an inbound distributor to have a good understanding of its customers and to be able to predict their needs.
23. As the concept of an inbound distributor is broad and can involve a variety of functions and transactions, we rely on a range of factors to help assess whether an entity is an inbound distributor. No individual factor is determinative, or has a 'bright-line' metric that differentiates inbound distributors from other entities. The factors we consider include:
- the main business activity disclosed on your tax return
- the proportion of tangible property expenditure of a revenue nature relative to cost of goods sold
- the proportion of tangible property expenditure of a revenue nature relative to total income
- the proportion of income from the sale of goods or digital products or services relative to other income
- the extent to which you undertake activities other than distribution activities, for example, the extent of contract research and development services provided, and
- the operating practice of your specific industry in relation to distribution activities.
24. No matter how you describe yourself, for example, as a routine distributor, a limited risk distributor or a marketer-distributor, the principles in this Guideline will apply if we consider you to be an inbound distributor to which this Guideline applies. However, your functional profile will be relevant when we consider the qualitative factors important to transfer pricing risk in your industry.
25. For the purposes of our risk assessment, we consider that inbound distribution arrangements do not involve the significant transformation of goods. If you undertake significant manufacturing, or you contract with another entity to manufacture for you, we will not treat those activities as part of your inbound distribution arrangements. For example, it may be that an assembly or formulation function is significant in your circumstances, and accordingly these activities would either need to be separated from the inbound distribution activities or the overall arrangement would not be treated as an inbound distribution arrangement.
26. Similarly, we do not consider finance or insurance activities, including those linked to sales activities, to be part of your inbound distribution arrangements. The transfer pricing risk associated with finance and insurance activities should be assessed separately, and Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2017/4 ATO compliance approach to taxation issues associated with cross-border related party financing arrangements and related transactions and Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2007/8 Treatment of non-resident captive insurance arrangements may be relevant.
Our compliance approach
30. Consistent with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations 2010 and other documents covered by section 815-135 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, you should use the transfer pricing methodology (or combination of methodologies) that is most appropriate and reliable for your circumstances when pricing your inbound distribution arrangements.
31. The quantitative and qualitative indicators set out in this Guideline are based on work we have undertaken in relation to Australian distribution activities. Accordingly, this Guideline sets out our compliance approach to the transfer pricing risk associated solely with inbound distribution arrangements.
32. Where this Guideline applies, you can expect the following compliance approach depending on your risk zone.
|Risk zone||Our approach|
|Low||We will generally not allocate compliance resources to assess your transfer pricing outcomes in relation to your inbound distribution arrangements other than to confirm your characterisation as an inbound distributor, and the extent of the activities you undertake.
We will be open to entering into early engagement advance pricing arrangement (APA) discussions with you and will be more likely to invite you to make a formal APA application. In addition, you will be eligible to request a pre-qualified unilateral APA process.
|Medium||We will monitor your arrangements using available data and may contact you to seek a better understanding of your circumstances before deciding to allocate further compliance resources.
We will be open to entering into early engagement APA discussions with you and may invite you to make a formal APA application. In addition, you will be eligible to request a pre-qualified unilateral APA process, although your prior year outcomes may be reviewed.
|High||We will consider appropriate treatment options and recommend that you review your transfer pricing policy. This may involve us:
When selecting our compliance activity, we will take into account various factors in addition to the framework in this Guideline. These factors include consideration of your global supply chain, the tax profile of your related parties and the amount of tax at risk.
We consider that entities with inbound distribution arrangements that consistently suffer losses pose a very high transfer pricing risk. We will ordinarily prioritise a review of you where you have been in an overall loss position for the aggregate of your current and previous two income years.
You may seek to enter into early engagement APA discussions with us, but you will not be eligible to request a pre-qualified unilateral APA process.
How we risk assess your inbound distribution arrangements
33. We assess the transfer pricing risk of your inbound distribution arrangements by comparing the profit outcome of your arrangements against our profit markers for inbound distributors. The profit markers relevant to you are based on the industry sector in which you operate and the extent to which your distribution arrangements involve activities that we see as generally adding incremental value in Australia.
34. We analyse the profit outcome of your inbound distribution arrangements using Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) relative to sales. The EBIT margin earned by an inbound distributor can be affected by a range of commercial factors. However, we consider the EBIT margin provides a reasonable basis for us to identify transfer pricing risks for inbound distribution arrangements.
35. Due to the circumstances of inbound distributors, in particular the predominance of spot or short term sales and their typical asset profile, we would expect to find similarity between their EBIT and profit before tax. We do not generally expect inbound distributors to enter into substantial debt arrangements.
36. Our approach to assessing the transfer pricing risk of your inbound distribution arrangements has similarities with the OECD transactional net margin method. However, this does not necessarily mean that we view this method as being the most appropriate transfer pricing method to price your arrangements.
37. We have undertaken a benchmarking exercise to understand the EBIT margins earned by distributors operating independently that we believe are relevant to the Australian economy. The exercise looked at distributors generally, and also focused on distributors in certain industry sectors.
38. These specific industry sectors were chosen due to the potential level of transfer pricing risk we see in those sectors based on the total value of the goods imported into Australia and previous case work we have undertaken.
39. From this benchmarking exercise, we have developed a set of profit markers that we use for assessing transfer pricing risk based on the industry sector in which the inbound distributor operates. The profit markers also take into account activities undertaken by the inbound distributor that we consider incrementally generate value in the industry sector, and which are therefore relevant to transfer pricing risk.
40. We analyse the profit performance of your inbound distribution arrangements against these profit markers in order to assess your transfer pricing risk. As a measure of profit performance, we calculate a five year weighted average EBIT margin.
41. In calculating the five year weighted average EBIT margin, where possible, we use financial information which reliably isolates the revenues and costs of your inbound distribution arrangements from the revenues and costs of any other business activities you carry on. This information may include statutory or management accounts that we have obtained in the course of our general compliance activity. However, in instances where this information is not available, we will assess whether, based on the information we do have, there are revenues or costs in the EBIT margin which make it inappropriate to assess your transfer pricing risk in this way. This will generally be the case where the revenues or costs unrelated to your inbound distribution activities are material. Determining the significance of unrelated revenues and costs to the risk assessment process is a matter of judgment.
Activities that incrementally generate value
44. Where inbound distributors undertake more economically significant activities relative to the generation of overall value, we would generally expect them to earn a relatively higher profit. As a result, in determining the relevant profit marker to assess your transfer pricing risk, we have regard to the extent to which you undertake activities that incrementally generate value. In assessing risk, we expect entities that undertake more activities which incrementally generate value to earn higher profit margins overall.
45. In certain industry sectors, we have identified activities that we consider incrementally generate value from inbound distribution arrangements. We see these activities as making a significant contribution to an overall value chain, and hence they have the potential to create increased value in Australia relative to other distributors that do not undertake such activities. Where relevant, the value-generating activities that we consider for risk assessment are specified as different categories of inbound distributors within the Schedules of this Guideline. Where we have identified categories of inbound distributors in an industry sector, we have developed profit markers for each category for that industry sector.
46. In addition to industry factors, we have regard to whether inbound distributors are significantly developing, enhancing, maintaining, protecting or exploiting intangibles when assessing risk. As this information becomes available to us, it may influence our view of the arm's length outcome from the overall activities such that we perceive a higher level of transfer pricing risk than indicated by the profit markers.
The risk assessment framework
48. The Schedules of this Guideline set out the profit markers we use to determine your risk zone based on your industry sector and your category of activities that incrementally generate value. For each category, there are two profit markers, A and B. Your risk zone is determined by your profit outcome relative to the markers for your category.
|Risk zone||You relative to the profit markers|
|Low||At or above profit marker A|
|Medium||Below profit marker A, but at or above profit marker B|
|High||Below profit marker B|
- an APA
- a settlement agreement between you and us
- a court or Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision that applies to you as a party to the proceeding, or
- we have conducted a review of your inbound distribution arrangements and provided you with a low risk or high assurance rating for those arrangements.
50. If you fall outside the low risk zone, we do not presume that your inbound distribution arrangements are uncommercial or that they fail to comply with Australia's transfer pricing rules. Falling outside the low risk zone means we consider your inbound distribution arrangements may give rise to an inappropriate transfer pricing outcome. Therefore, we will generally conduct some form of compliance activity in relation to your inbound distribution arrangements.
51. Schedule 1 of this Guideline sets out the profit markers that we use for determining the transfer pricing risk for inbound distributors generally (general distributors). Further schedules apply to inbound distributors operating in the life science sector, the ICT sector and the motor vehicles sector. We apply Schedule 1 unless a more specific schedule applies.
53. The profit markers in the Schedules are provided to give you transparency in relation to our compliance approach. You should not use the profit markers as a safe harbour to adjust your arrangements so that you sit lower within a particular zone merely because it does not change your overall risk zone. We will monitor outcomes for inbound distribution arrangements over time to ensure there is no unexplained 'drift' within a risk zone.
54. We may ask you to tell us in writing whether you have reviewed the compliance risk of your inbound distribution arrangements and which risk zone you believe your arrangements fall within. You may be required to inform us which risk zone you believe you fall within via the Reportable Tax Position schedule.
How to increase certainty through the advance pricing arrangement program
55. Our APA program provides you with the opportunity to engage with us in a constructive way to reach agreement on the transfer pricing of your inbound distribution arrangements for a fixed period of time. An APA may assist you with managing and mitigating your transfer pricing risk and provide you with greater certainty on a prospective basis. Our practice and procedures for entering an APA are set out in Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2015/4 Advance Pricing Arrangements.
57. Where your inbound distribution arrangements are in the high risk zone and you expect them to stay there, there are likely to be factors that would make reaching an agreement on an APA difficult. In particular, to the extent that the proposed APA relies on the use of a transactional net margin method, we would be likely to enter into discussions with significantly divergent views on appropriate outcomes. We may also wish to focus on past transfer pricing outcomes as part of our compliance approach.
58. In addition, a significant divergence between your EBIT and profit before tax would require attention as part of the early engagement discussions. For example, we do not generally expect inbound distributors to enter into substantial debt arrangements due to the nature of the sales income and asset profile.
59. There are opportunities to reduce the level of work and additional information ordinarily required under certain steps of the APA process where you are able to pre-qualify based on the approach set out in this Guideline.
60. In particular, where you are able to demonstrate that this Guideline applies to you as an inbound distributor, and you are interested in proposing an APA method and application aligned to the profit markers in this Guideline, your APA process will be considered to have pre-qualified for certain aspects of the APA (a pre-qualified APA). A pre-qualified APA may benefit from saving time and resources, as there is likely to be:
- reduced information gathering with a focus on confirming your characterisation as an inbound distributor, the extent of your incremental value-generating activities and the applicability of the transactional net margin method, and
- no requirement for you to prepare benchmarking as we will provide the profit benchmarks most relevant to your circumstances (see paragraphs 37 to 42 of this Guideline).
61. If you request a pre-qualified APA, we will still undertake a triage process as set out in PS LA 2015/4 to identify whether there are tax issues other than transfer pricing that are material impediments to entering into an APA. Where you have been reviewed under a tax assurance review, and we have obtained a high level of assurance, we will generally seek to use that information for our triage review.
62. The transactions covered by an APA entered into after 4 April 2017, including a pre-qualified APA, will generally be considered to be low risk for the purposes of the diverted profits tax (DPT) for the period of the APA. A pre-qualified APA for your inbound distribution arrangements may include a DPT clause that provides written assurance that we will not seek to make a DPT assessment in relation to the transactions covered by the APA. If you would like a DPT clause to be included in an APA, we ask that you make note of it in your APA submission or as early as possible in the APA process as further information may be required to enable us to make a decision in relation to any such request.
Transitioning existing arrangements to the low risk zone
63. We encourage willing and co-operative compliance and recognise that the publication of this Guideline may prompt you to review your inbound distribution arrangements. This may cause you to adjust your inbound distribution arrangements to come within our low risk zone prospectively.
64. For the period of 12 months from the date of publication of this Guideline, we will consider remitting shortfall penalties to nil and shortfall interest charge to the base rate if certain pre-conditions are met. The conditions are that you make a voluntary disclosure in relation to all income years where your arrangements are in place and adjust your historic and prospective pricing to reflect an appropriate transfer pricing outcome based on the law. If you do so, we will view this as a strong factor in favour of exercising the Commissioner's discretion to remit.
Who to contact
Commissioner of Taxation
13 March 2019
SCHEDULE 1 - GENERAL DISTRIBUTORS
69. The fundamental characteristics of an inbound distributor are set out in the main body of this Guideline.
70. As the general distributors category is a broad category that covers a wide range of industries and circumstances, we do not specifically identify categories of activities that we consider incrementally generate value. Accordingly, we assess transfer pricing risk for general distributors as a single category based on one set of profit markers. As set out in the main body of this Guideline, we would generally expect taxpayers that perform more activities to have a higher profit.
SCHEDULE 2 - LIFE SCIENCE
73. The fundamental characteristics of an inbound distributor are set out in the main body of this Guideline.
74. The life science industry consists of entities involved in the discovery, development, production and sales, and marketing of medicine. For the purposes of this Guideline, the industry comprises five sub-sectors:
- medical equipment and devices
- over-the-counter, and
- animal health.
75. In assessing transfer pricing risk for inbound distributors in the life science industry sector, we assess entities under categories based on the extent to which they undertake activities that incrementally generate value. We do this by having regard to the facts and circumstances of a business, which may include considering revenue or operating expenses associated with an activity, and interactions between activities in different categories.
|Category||Activities that incrementally generate value|
|1||Entity engaged in the
of life science products. This may include performing any of the following activities in relation to your inbound distribution arrangements:
|2||Entity engaged in:
|3||Entity engaged in:
77. Based on the categories at paragraph 76 of this Guideline, we use the following profit markers for assessing transfer pricing risk so as to take into account the activities that we consider incrementally generate value in the life science sector. As set out in the main body of this Guideline, we would generally expect entities that perform more activities to have a higher profit.
SCHEDULE 3 - INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
79. The fundamental characteristics of an inbound distributor are set out in the main body of this Guideline.
80. The ICT industry sector includes all types of consumer and enterprise computer hardware and software products, digital communication devices, applications, IT solutions and ancillary services that enable interaction through technology.
81. In assessing transfer pricing risk for inbound distributors in the ICT industry sector, we assess entities under categories based on the extent to which they undertake activities that incrementally generate value. We do this by having regard to the facts and circumstances of a business, which may include considering revenue or operating expenses associated with an activity, and interactions between activities in different categories.
|Category||Activities that incrementally generate value|
|1||Entity engaged in the
of ICT products. This may include performing any of the following activities in relation to your inbound distribution arrangements:
|2||Entity engaged in any of
the activities specified in Category 1
and any of the following:
83. Based on the categories at paragraph 82 of this Guideline, we use the following profit markers for assessing transfer pricing risk so as to take into account the activities that we consider incrementally generate value in the ICT industry sector. As set out in the main body of this Guideline, we would generally expect entities that perform more activities to have a higher profit.
SCHEDULE 4 - MOTOR VEHICLES
85. The fundamental characteristics of an inbound distributor are set out in the main body of this Guideline.
86. We consider you to be in the motor vehicles industry sector if your business trades in passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, motorcycles or other recreational motorised vehicles or their associated parts.
87. The motor vehicles industry is diverse and encompasses upstream and downstream activities. Upstream activities relate to the development and construction of motor vehicles and include activities involved in the design, testing, engineering, manufacturing and assembling of motor vehicles and their associated components. Downstream activities relate to the distribution and use of motor vehicles and include sales, servicing and repairs, provision of fuels, recycling and disposal, and aftermarket activities.
88. The role of a motor vehicle distributor includes a range of functions that support the activity of distribution. These functions include marketing and sales, after sales support, procurement and administration, as well as functions involving transportation, warehousing and inventory management.
89. Motor vehicle distributors generally sell through an independent dealership network, which they support to maintain a strong relationship. While motor vehicle distributors may have some retail operation, their primary sales channel is not their own retail activity.
90. We do not identify categories of specific activities that we consider incrementally generate value for motor vehicle distributors. Accordingly, we assess transfer pricing risk for motor vehicle distributors as a single category based on one set of profit markers.
91. We use the following profit markers for assessing transfer pricing risk for motor vehicle distributors. As set out in the main body of this Guideline, we would generally expect entities that perform more activities to have a higher profit.
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
For example, this Guideline does not limit the operation of Subdivision 284-E of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA) which sets out special rules about unarguable positions for cross-border transfer pricing.
Refer to paragraph 48 of this Guideline.
Refer to paragraphs 55 to 62 of this Guideline.
Refer to paragraphs 37 to 42 of this Guideline.
Refer to paragraphs 43 to 46 of this Guideline.
Refer to paragraph 18 of Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2018/5 Diverted profits tax.
Refer to paragraphs 53 to 55 of PCG 2018/5.
Division 284 of Schedule 1 to the TAA.
Division 280 of Schedule 1 to the TAA.
The Commissioner's guidelines on remission of shortfall penalties are set out in Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2011/30 Remission of administrative penalties relating to schemes imposed by subsection 284-145(1) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953, Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2012/4 Administration of the false or misleading statement penalty - where there is no shortfall amounts, Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2012/5 Administration of the false or misleading statement penalty - where there is a shortfall amount, Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2014/2 Administration of transfer pricing penalties for income years commencing on or after 29 June 2013, Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2014/4 Administration of the penalty imposed under subsection 284-75(3) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 and Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2016/2 Administration of scheme penalties arising from the application of Subdivision 815-A for income years which started on or after 1 July 2004 and before 1 July 2012 (transition period). The Commissioner's guidelines on remission of shortfall interest charge are set out in Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2006/8 Remission of shortfall interest charge and general interest charge for shortfall periods.
Refer to paragraphs 15 to 26 of this Guideline.
Refer to paragraphs 15 to 26 of this Guideline.
Refer to paragraphs 15 to 26 of this Guideline.
Refer to paragraphs 15 to 26 of this Guideline.
PS LA 2006/8
PS LA 2007/8
PS LA 2011/30
PS LA 2012/4
PS LA 2012/5
PS LA 2014/2
PS LA 2014/4
PS LA 2015/4
PS LA 2016/2
Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations, OECD, 22 July 2010