Practical Compliance Guideline

PCG 2019/8

ATO compliance approach to GST apportionment of acquisitions that relate to certain financial supplies

  • An updated version of this Guideline has been issued as a draft for public comment.
    This document has changed over time. View its history.
    There is a Compendium for this document: PCG 2019/8EC .
Table of Contents Paragraph
What this Guideline is about
Who this Guideline applies to
Structure of this Guideline
Date of effect
Our compliance approach
The green zone limitations
When you will be in the white zone
When to self-assess your risk rating and report it to the ATO
Transitioning your arrangements
SCHEDULE 1 - Credit cards
35

Relying on this Guideline

This Practical Compliance Guideline sets out a practical administration approach to assist taxpayers in complying with relevant tax laws. Provided you follow this Guideline in good faith, the Commissioner will administer the law in accordance with this approach.

What this Guideline is about

1. This Guideline outlines our compliance approach for GST apportionment of acquisitions that relate to certain financial supplies. This Guideline sets out the framework we use to assess the risk associated with methods to determine the extent of creditable purpose (ECP)[1] of these acquisitions under the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999.[2]

2. If this Guideline applies to you, it applies to acquisitions that relate to making the financial supplies covered by the Schedule[3] in the ordinary course of business.

3. This Guideline reflects our expectations for the design of an apportionment method for these acquisitions. We recognise that flexibility is required in practice, as your individual circumstances (such as your business structure and how your cost allocation system operates) will affect how the principles are implemented.

4. We use the risk assessment framework in this Guideline and the accompanying Schedule to tailor our engagement with you having regard to your risk rating.

5. You can use this Guideline to:

·
obtain confidence about your approach by self-assessing the compliance risk associated with your apportionment method
·
understand the compliance approach we are likely to adopt given your position within our risk framework, and
·
work with us to mitigate the risk associated with your arrangements and to consider opportunities to reduce the likelihood that you will be subject to compliance activity.

6. We are committed to working with you to assist you to obtain confidence about your approach and minimise your compliance risk in this area. If you are unsure about how we would assess the risk associated with your approach or would like certainty in relation to your arrangements, you should contact us for assistance.

7. This Guideline is not intended to address every potential feature of an apportionment method or variation in individual circumstances noting, in particular:

·
Acquisitions made as part of a transformational or extraordinary change to the business (including to information technology systems) do not fall within the scope of this Guideline.
·
If your arrangements are under review, we are not limited to the matters covered in this Guideline.
·
Regardless of your risk zone, we may apply compliance resources to test risks that are beyond what is covered in this Guideline.[4]

8. The apportionment methods set out in this Guideline are for risk assessment purposes only, and should not be taken as a requirement to use a specific method. Methods or examples provided in this Guideline must be considered in their entirety, as the absence of some elements or the presence of additional elements may change your risk rating.

9. This Guideline does not limit the operation of the law, and it does not replace, alter or affect our interpretation of the law in any way.[5] It does not relieve you of your legal obligation to comply with all relevant tax laws.

10. In this Guideline, we refer to 'relevant support area costs in other business units'. These are acquisitions that are not allocated to the business unit that makes a financial supply (such as the credit card issuing business), but that are to some extent for use in making the supply.[6] For example, this includes acquisitions in other business units that relate to particular supplies in the credit card issuing business (for example, a proportion of marketing, technology or customer service costs), overheads that indirectly relate to all the supplies made in the credit card issuing business, or enterprise costs to the extent they relate to making supplies in the credit card issuing business.[7]

11. This Guideline relates to determining the intended use of your acquisitions under Divisions 11, 15, 70, 72 and 84. While this Guideline does not address adjustments for the change in use of an acquisition under Division 129, we would expect you to use the same method that you used to determine intended use for these purposes.

Who this Guideline applies to

12. This Guideline applies to you if you make financial supplies that are covered by the accompanying Schedule.

13. This Guideline applies to you in relation to all acquisitions that relate to making these supplies (including relevant support area costs in other business units).

14. This Guideline will not address how you identify which acquisitions are subject to a particular Schedule (for example, how to determine the extent to which acquisitions are for use in making supplies in the credit card issuing business). We would expect your identification of these acquisitions to follow your natural cost allocation or accounting systems (for example, in identifying the proportion of support area costs in other business units that are for use in making supplies in the credit card issuing business). We would also expect that any changes in the way you allocate your costs would be in response to business changes. Changes in cost allocation for reasons unrelated to business changes are likely to be subject to compliance activity.

15. Consistent with GSTR 2006/3, we accept that you do not necessarily need to give specific consideration to the status of each individual acquisition. In this context, we accept that you can take an approach where you identify and analyse acquisitions of a particular type that have a similar intended use (for example, the part of your debt collection costs that relate to making particular financial supplies) and treat them in the same way.

16. This Guideline does not apply to you if you have little or no access to direct estimation methods, and as a consequence you do not use direct estimation methods to allocate or apportion any of your acquisitions to particular business units (for example, a credit card issuing business) or products and/or particular supplies.[8]

17. For example, this Guideline does not apply to you if you are a smaller financial institution that uses an entity-based general formula for apportionment of all your acquisitions provided that this is in accordance with GSTR 2006/3.[9]

18. If this Guideline does not apply to you, a review may be undertaken under our usual compliance programs in order to determine whether your method is fair and reasonable in accordance with GSTR 2006/3.

Structure of this Guideline

19. It is our intention to include additional Schedules to address other specific contexts in the future. We will consult publicly in respect of any additional Schedules.

20. This Guideline is structured as follows:

·
the main body explains the risk assessment framework that is relevant to the accompanying Schedule, and
·
the accompanying Schedule sets out the risk assessment framework for apportionment of acquisitions that relate to making the relevant financial supplies.

21. You will need to read the main body and Schedule in conjunction to determine your risk rating for the Schedule.

Date of effect

22. This Guideline has effect from the start of your first tax period commencing on or after 1 January 2020.[10]

23. Each Schedule may have effect from a different date. Where this is the case, the date of effect will be stated in the relevant Schedule.

24. The use and application of this Guideline will be under review following its finalisation. Any revisions will be made at the end of an initial three year review period or on an 'as necessary' basis. In particular, where a particular ECP rate is used as part of our risk assessment framework, we will review this rate regularly in line with industry developments. We will consult with impacted stakeholders in relation to proposed material changes.

Our compliance approach

25. The risk assessment framework in this Guideline is made up of five zones. Where this Guideline applies, you can expect the following engagement from us depending on your risk zone:

Risk zone Risk level Our compliance approach
White Self-assessment of risk level unnecessary No review other than to confirm ongoing consistency with the agreed/determined approach.
Green Low risk We will generally only apply compliance resources to confirm you meet the requirements for this risk rating.
Blue Low to moderate risk Low to moderate priority for review.

We may undertake compliance activity to gain assurance that you fall within this zone or to address exceptional circumstances.

Yellow Moderate risk Moderate priority for review.

We may undertake compliance activity to review or test your approach.

We will work with you to understand and resolve any areas of difference.

Red High risk High priority for review.

Reviews are likely to be commenced as a matter of priority.

The green zone limitations

26. Where the risk assessment framework in a Schedule provides that you will be in the green zone if you do not exceed a particular ECP rate (as a weighted average across all of the relevant acquisitions), this is subject to the following limitations:

·
If your weighted average ECP rate for the relevant acquisitions was below the relevant rate prior to the date of effect of the Schedule, you cannot automatically uplift your results to claim this rate. If we identify such uplift, we may seek to understand your relevant circumstances further.[11]
·
If your ECP rate is in the green zone, this does not necessarily mean that the method you used to determine your rate is itself low risk. As such, if the results of the method exceed the rate to be in the green zone in another period and you apply that higher rate, you will no longer be in the green zone and our compliance approach may change according to your new risk rating.
·
If you subsequently lodge amendments to your business activity statements and these changes would result in your arrangement being outside of the green zone, you will be taken to not have been in the green zone and we may apply compliance resources to assess your methodology.

When you will be in the white zone

27. You will be in the white zone and do not need to consider your risk rating where either:

·
you are applying the rate in PCG 2017/15 in accordance with that Guideline in the relevant period, or
·
you meet the requirements in paragraphs 31 to 34 of this Guideline in respect of the transitional period relevant to a Schedule[12], or
·
you satisfy both of the following requirements

-
any of the following apply to your approach under a Schedule in the relevant period

o
a settlement agreement between you and us for the relevant period
o
a court decision to which you are a party
o
a current private ruling on which you are relying
o
we have conducted a review in the last two years of a period following the date of effect of this Guideline and provided you with a low risk or high assurance rating for your approach

AND
-
there has not been a material change in your factual circumstances, including in the design or implementation of your methodology, since the time of the agreement, decision or review, or when compared to the scheme described in your private ruling.

When to self-assess your risk rating and report it to the ATO

28. You are able to self-assess your risk rating on an annual basis if there have been no changes in your apportionment methodology during the year. For Schedules that commence on 1 January 2020, we would expect you to self-assess your risk rating for the period 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020.

29. If there have been changes in your apportionment methodology during the year, you will need to self-assess the relevant periods separately. If you self-assess as being in the green zone at the start of the year, you will need to self-assess the tax periods where your rate exceeds the green zone rate separately.

30. We may ask you to tell us in writing whether you have reviewed your risk rating under this Guideline and which risk zone your arrangements fall within. If you are in an annual compliance arrangement, we will expect you to notify us of your risk rating on an annual basis. We will also ask you to tell us your ECP rate relevant to applicable Schedules and whether there have been changes to your methodology during the year.

Transitioning your arrangements

31. We encourage willing and cooperative compliance and recognise that the publication of this Guideline may prompt you to review your apportionment methods. This may cause you to adjust your apportionment methods to come within our green zone prospectively.

32. For the first six months following the date of effect of a Schedule, you will be in the white zone for that period if:

·
you are actively engaging with us by the date of effect of the relevant Schedule to transition your arrangements to the green zone
·
by the end of the six-month period, you have made a voluntary disclosure to amend your business activity statements for the periods from the relevant date of effect to achieve an outcome in the green zone, and
·
for the remainder of the year, your approach will result in your arrangements being in the green zone.

33. We will confirm with you whether you meet the requirements to be in the white zone for this transitional period.

34. If you meet the requirements set out in paragraph 32 of this Guideline, then in respect of the six-month transitional period, we will remit any general interest charge to the base rate and, if any shortfall penalties are imposed, remit those penalties to nil.

Commissioner of Taxation
18 December 2019

SCHEDULE 1: Credit cards

Table of Contents Paragraph
Scope of this Schedule 35
Our risk assessment framework 38
Examples 39
Example 1 - green zone 39
Example 2 - blue zone 43
Example 3 - blue zone 50
Date of effect 57

Scope of this Schedule

35. This Schedule applies to you if you issue credit cards or charge cards in a four-party (open loop) payment system.[13]

36. This Schedule applies to all acquisitions that are for use or partly for use in making supplies in the credit card issuing business, regardless of where they are allocated in your cost allocation system.

37. The Commissioner's views on the application of paragraph 11-15(2)(a) to acquisitions that relate to making these supplies are set out in GSTR 2019/2.

Our risk assessment framework

38. Our risk assessment framework is set out as follows:

Risk zone Your approach
Green You are in the green zone if you apply an ECP rate of no more than 35% as a weighted average across all acquisitions to the extent they are for use in making supplies in your credit card issuing business (including relevant support area costs in other business units).

If you are in the green zone, we will generally only apply compliance resources to confirm you meet the requirements for this risk rating. This means we will not apply compliance resources to consider whether the apportionment method used is fair and reasonable, unless there are exceptional circumstances.

Blue You are in the blue zone if your ECP rate exceeds the rate stipulated in the green zone, and your method meets all of the following requirements:

1.
You determine the extent to which the supply of the credit card facility is GST-free as follows:

A.
The method you use to determine the extent of GST-free use is in accordance with Goods and Services Tax Determination GSTD 2017/1 Goods and services tax: when is the supply of a credit card facility GST-free under paragraph (a) of Item 4 in subsection 38-190(1) of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act)?[14]
B.
You apply the resulting GST-free percentage consistently across all acquisitions in reflecting the extent they relate to the supply of the credit card facility. For example, you do not treat some acquisitions as relating only to the GST-free use of the credit card facility.
C.
Your method recognises that the consideration for the supply of the credit card facility includes any amounts the cardholder pays as a result of their obligations under the credit card facility contract. For example, you do not treat overseas transaction fees as consideration for a separate GST-free supply.[15]

2.
Your apportionment method reflects an analysis of your acquisitions, in accordance with GSTR 2019/2, to determine how they relate to your supplies. This analysis extends to relevant support area costs in other business units. Your apportionment method reflects whether these acquisitions relate to particular supplies (for example, a proportion of branch network, call centre, and certain technology and marketing costs, which only relate to the supply of the credit card facility), or are instead remaining overheads that indirectly relate to all the supplies made in the credit card issuing business or enterprise costs that you identify as relating to some extent to the credit card issuing business (for example, a proportion of rental costs for head office premises).
3.
As part of this analysis, you identify:

A.
Acquisitions that only relate to the financial supply of the credit card facility.[16] These acquisitions have an ECP equal to the extent that this supply is GST-free.
B.
Acquisitions that relate to both the financial supply of the credit card facility and the taxable supply of interchange services.[17] You treat all of these acquisitions (excluding acquisitions that are overheads that indirectly relate to all the supplies made in the credit card issuing business, or enterprise costs[18]) as being equally intended for use in making both supplies. This means apportionment on a 50/50 basis between the supplies (including adjusting for the extent to which the supply of the credit card facility is GST-free) to determine the ECP.

However, if there are 'on-us' transactions where you are both the issuer and acquirer, you do not make supplies of interchange services in relation to these transactions. To take this into account, you treat these acquisitions as only relating to the supply of the credit card facility, to the extent that cardholders' transactions are 'on-us'.

C.
Acquisitions that are overheads that indirectly relate to all the supplies made in the credit card issuing business or enterprise costs that you identify as relating to some extent to the credit card issuing business. You determine the ECP of these remaining acquisitions using an input based indirect method based on a weighted average of the ECP of the acquisitions you have directly allocated at the steps listed for this zone.[19]

4.
For acquisitions of information technology and processing services, you recognise situations where parts of the acquisition are to manage and operate credit card facility accounts (which only relate to the supply of the credit card facility), when compared to other parts that are to process credit card transactions (which relate to both the supply of the credit card facility and the supply of interchange services).[20]
5.
If you make other supplies in your credit card issuing business, you analyse the extent (if any) to which your acquisitions relate to that supply, and integrate this into the steps listed for this zone.[21] Your method does not assume that all acquisitions relate to all supplies made in the credit card issuing business or that the acquisitions that relate to taxable supplies of interchange services will necessarily also relate to other taxable supplies you make.
6.
You identify and adjust for substantial one-off acquisitions or supplies to address any resulting distortion.
7.
In reflecting each of these steps in your method, you may either

A.
apply separate ECP rates to the different acquisitions, or
B.
determine a weighted average ECP that reflects all of the acquisitions to the extent they are for use in making supplies in the credit card issuing business (including the analysis of relevant support area costs in other business units), which is applied to all relevant acquisitions.

8.
You review and update the relevant inputs into your method both annually, and if material changes occur.
9.
Your apportionment method is documented and supported by an appropriate tax governance framework.[22]

Note: If you are in the red zone, you will not be in the blue zone.

Yellow You are in the yellow zone if your rate exceeds the rate stipulated in the green zone and you are not in either the blue or red zone.
Red You are in the red zone if your rate exceeds the rate stipulated in the green zone and any of the following apply:

1.
Where your method recognises the extent to which the supply of the credit card facility is GST-free, you do not determine the GST-free percentage or reflect this in your method in the way set out in the blue zone.
2.
Your apportionment method does not take into account that some acquisitions only relate to the financial supply of the credit card facility, in accordance with the ATO view in GSTR 2019/2.
3.
You use a method that allocates acquisitions between transactors (broadly, cardholders that do not pay interest) and revolvers (broadly, cardholders that do pay interest) and applies separate revenue methods to each pool of cardholders, which are then blended to determine an ECP rate.
4.
Your apportionment method treats some acquisitions as having a closer relationship to the supply of interchange services than to the supply of the credit card facility.
5.
If you have an acquiring business, your apportionment method treats acquisitions in your credit card issuing business as partly relating to taxable supplies made in relation to 'on-us' transactions.
6.
You do not identify and adjust for substantial one-off acquisitions or supplies to address any resulting distortion.
7.
You do not review and update the relevant inputs into your method annually, or when material changes occur.
8.
Your apportionment method is not documented and supported by an appropriate tax governance framework.[23]

Examples

Example 1 - green zone

39. Verdant Bank's ECP rate is no more than 35%, as a weighted average, which is applied to:

·
acquisitions in the business unit for its credit card issuing business, and
·
acquisitions in relevant support areas in other business units, to the extent that they are for use in the credit card issuing business. This includes a proportion of its branch network, call centre, technology, and marketing costs which are in other business units, and a proportion of its overheads that indirectly relate to all the supplies made in the credit card issuing business or enterprise costs that it identifies as being for use in the credit card issuing business.

40. As the ECP rate used is no more than 35% as a weighted average for all acquisitions to the extent they are for use in making supplies in the credit card issuing business (including acquisitions in relevant support areas in other business units), Verdant Bank is in the green zone.

41. As Verdant Bank is in the green zone we will not apply compliance resources to assess if the apportionment methodology is fair and reasonable.

42. In addition, Verdant Bank also claims reduced input tax credits on the relevant acquisitions to the extent it is entitled to do so.

Example 2 - blue zone

43. Cyan Bank undertakes an analysis of the acquisitions that are for use or partly for use in making supplies in the credit card issuing business (including in relevant support areas in other business units) over the previous 12 months.

44. In this case, Cyan Bank only has a few bank branches, so a higher proportion of its acquisitions relate to both the supply of the credit card facility and the supply of interchange services.

45. Cyan Bank's analysis is as follows:

Acquisitions Analysis
Acquisitions that only relate to the supply of the credit card facility.

These acquisitions include a proportion of branch network costs and call centre costs, debt collection costs, costs to prepare credit card statements, credit check services, services to facilitate the introduction of new cardholders, and advertising services to sign up new cardholders.[24]

Some of these acquisitions are in the business unit for the credit card issuing business, and some are relevant support area costs in other business units.

These acquisitions have an ECP equal to the extent that this supply is GST-free.

Cyan Bank determines these acquisitions have an ECP rate of 4% by reference to the past usage patterns of its cardholders in accordance with GSTD 2017/1.

Acquisitions that relate to both the supply of the credit card facility and the supply of interchange services.

These acquisitions include loyalty reward costs, issuer scheme services and credit card production services.[25]

Cyan Bank treats all of these acquisitions as being equally intended for use in making both supplies, with apportionment on a 50/50 basis between the supplies. If Cyan Bank made supplies of interchange services in relation to all transactions undertaken by cardholders, this would result in an ECP rate for these acquisitions of 52% (as the supply of the credit card facility is 4% GST-free).

However, in this example, Cyan Bank has an acquiring business, and it determines that 25% of its cardholders' transactions are 'on-us' transactions where it does not make supplies of interchange services. As such, only 75% of these acquisitions would attract the 52% ECP rate.

Therefore Cyan Bank determines the ECP rate of the acquisitions is 40% ((75% × 52%) + (25% × 4%)).

Acquisitions that are processing services used in the credit card issuing business.

These acquisitions are partly to manage and operate the credit card facility account (which only relate to the supply of the credit card facility), and partly to process credit card transactions via the payment system (which relate to both supplies).[26]

Cyan Bank undertakes an objective assessment of its acquisitions of processing services to determine the parts that only relate to the supply of the credit card facility, and the parts which relate to both supplies.

By undertaking an objective assessment of the relevant functions of the applications involved, Cyan Bank determines that 60% of the acquisitions only relate to the supply of the credit card facility and the remaining 40% relate to both supplies.

Using the ECP rates of 4% and 40% from the two steps listed, Cyan Bank determines the ECP rate of the acquisitions is 18.4% ((60% × 4%) + (40% × 40%)).

46. To reflect this analysis in its apportionment method, Cyan Bank decides to use separate coding mechanisms to reflect the relevant ECP rate for each of the categories of acquisitions. It will review these coding mechanisms every 12 months (or if material changes occur in its business).

47. Cyan Bank also has acquisitions that are overheads that indirectly relate to all the supplies made in its credit card issuing business or that are enterprise costs (for example, a proportion of rental costs for head office premises or a proportion of marketing costs to promote awareness of the brand of entity) that are identified as being to some extent for use in the credit card issuing business. Using an input based indirect method, Cyan Bank calculates a weighted average ECP of 35.51% based on the acquisitions it has analysed, which it applies to these relevant overheads or enterprise costs. Cyan Bank also treats the small number of relevant acquisitions that it has not analysed in the same way.[27]

48. When calculated across all of the relevant acquisitions, Cyan Bank's method results in a weighted average ECP rate that is above the rate to be in the green zone. However, as Cyan Bank is using a method that meets all of the requirements to be low to moderate risk (this includes that it adjusts for any substantial one-off acquisitions or supplies, and that the apportionment method is documented and supported by an appropriate tax governance framework), it is in the blue zone.

49. In addition, Cyan Bank also claims reduced input tax credits on the relevant acquisitions to the extent it is entitled to do so.

Example 3 - blue zone

50. As in Example 2, Cyan Bank undertakes an analysis of acquisitions that are for use or partly for use in making supplies in the credit card issuing business (including acquisitions in relevant support areas in other business units) over the previous 12 months.

51. However, in this Example, Cyan Bank decides to use only one ECP rate across all of the relevant acquisitions. Cyan Bank determines a weighted average ECP rate that reflects the analysis of its acquisitions.

52. This analysis can be summarised as follows:

Acquisitions GST incurred ECP
Acquisitions that only relate to the supply of the credit card facility $1.2m 4%
Acquisitions that relate to both the supply of the credit card facility and the supply of interchange services. $13m 40%
Acquisitions that are processing services used in the credit card issuing business $1.2m 18.4%
Total / weighted average $15.4m 35.51%

53. Cyan Bank applies the weighted average ECP rate of 35.51% to all of the acquisitions to the extent they are for use in making supplies in the credit card issuing business (including acquisitions in relevant support area costs in other business units). It also applies this rate to acquisitions that are overheads that indirectly relate to all the supplies made in the credit card issuing business or that are enterprise costs which it identifies are to some extent for use in the credit card issuing business (for example, a proportion of rental costs for head office premises or a proportion of marketing costs to promote awareness of the brand of entity).

54. Cyan Bank uses this rate for the next 12-month period before re-testing it to determine a new weighted average ECP rate (assuming no material changes occur in the meantime). Cyan Bank applies this method consistently, using the analysis of the previous 12 months to determine the intended use for the next 12-month period.

55. Cyan Bank's method results in a weighted average ECP rate across all of the relevant acquisitions that are above the rate to be in the green zone. However, as Cyan Bank is using a method that meets all of the requirements to be low to moderate risk (this includes that it adjusts for any substantial one-off acquisitions or supplies, and that the apportionment method is documented and supported by an appropriate tax governance framework), it is in the blue zone.

56. In addition, Cyan Bank also claims reduced input tax credits on the relevant acquisitions to the extent it is entitled to do so.

Date of effect

57. This Schedule has effect from the start of your first tax period commencing on or after 1 January 2020.

© AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).


This Guideline does not address whether acquisitions are reduced credit acquisitions or your entitlement to reduced input tax credits. However if you are entitled to reduced input tax credits this Guideline applies to the 'extent of creditable purpose' percentage in subsection 70-20(2) of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999. Your 'extent of Division 70 creditable purpose' under subsection 70-20(2) will be in addition to the ECP that is discussed in this Guideline.


All legislative references are to the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 unless otherwise indicated.


Additional Schedules may be included to address other specific contexts in the future. See paragraphs 19 to 21 of this Guideline.


Examples of risks we may test include whether you have correctly identified whether an acquisition is a reduced credit acquisition, whether you have correctly identified an obligation to apply the reverse charge provisions, or your approach where you make supplies that are not addressed in this Guideline (such as taxable supplies of loyalty program membership).


The Commissioner's views on determining the ECP for financial supply providers are set out in Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2006/3 Goods and services tax: determining the extent of creditable purpose for providers of financial supplies.


Note that in this Guideline, a reference to an acquisition includes a reference to a part of an acquisition (where applicable).


See paragraphs 136 to 148 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2008/1 Goods and services tax: when do you acquire anything or import goods solely or partly for a creditable purpose? for an explanation of overheads and enterprise costs.


Note that in situations where you are applying the rate in Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2017/15 GST and Customer Owned Banking Institutions in accordance with that Guideline, you will be in the white zone as per paragraph 27 of this Guideline.


See paragraphs 92 to 101A of GSTR 2006/3 for an explanation of direct estimation methods, and paragraphs 105 to 108 in relation to the use of an entity-based general formula.


If you are applying the rate in PCG 2017/15 prior to the date of effect of this Guideline and you choose to stop applying that rate in order to fall within this Guideline from its date of effect, paragraph 17 of PCG 2017/15 will not prevent you from applying the 18% rate for the first part of your financial year.


If you transition from applying the rate in PCG 2017/15 into the green zone of a Schedule, this will not in itself attract our attention. However, as part of this transition we would expect that you revisit the methods you apply to all of your other relevant acquisitions, on the basis that PCG 2017/15 would no longer apply to you.


Following the transitional period, you will need to self-assess your risk rating against the framework in the relevant Schedule.


This Schedule does not cover acquisitions in a credit card issuing business in a three-party (closed loop) scheme, or in a credit card acquiring business. The four-party (open loop) payment system is summarised in paragraph 15 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2019/2 Goods and services tax: determining the creditable purpose of acquisitions in a credit card issuing business, with further explanation and an explanation of a three-party (closed loop) payment system provided in paragraphs 246A to 246C of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2004/1 Goods and services tax: reduced credit acquisitions. Any reference to the supply of a credit card facility includes a reference to the supply of a charge card facility.


Note that paragraph 10 of GSTR 2019/2 provides our view that table item 4 has a broader application than table item 3 in subsection 38-190(1) in this context, meaning that it is unnecessary to consider the application of table item 3.


See paragraph 11 and 12 of GSTR 2019/2.


This includes acquisitions in Examples 1 to 7 and 14 of GSTR 2019/2.


This includes acquisitions in Examples 9 to 13 of GSTR 2019/2.


See paragraphs 136 to 148 of GSTR 2008/1.


See paragraphs 125 to 130 of GSTR 2006/3 for an explanation of an input based indirect method and Example 2 of this Schedule for an illustration in this context.


See Example 13 and 14 of GSTR 2019/2.


For example, supplies you make to a payment scheme operator in exchange for scheme incentive payments, where you have determined that these are separate supplies you make (rather than an adjustment to the consideration for a supply made by the payment scheme operator).


For further information, see paragraphs 145 to 150 of GSTR 2006/3 and our guidance on GST governance and record keeping on ato.gov.au.


For further information, see paragraphs 145 to 150 of GSTR 2006/3 and GST governance and record keeping on ato.gov.au.


See Examples 1 to 7 of GSTR 2019/2.


See Examples 9 to 12 of GSTR 2019/2.


See Examples 13 and 14 of GSTR 2019/2.


See paragraphs 125 to 130 of GSTR 2006/3.

Previously released in draft format as PCG 2019/D7

ATO references: File 1-I17UAM4
ISSN: 2209-1297

Business Line:  PGI

Related Rulings/Determinations:
GSTD 2017/1
GSTR 2004/1
GSTR 2006/3
GSTR 2008/1
GSTR 2019/2
PCG 2017/15

Legislative References:
ANTS(GST)A 1999 11-15(2)(a)
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-190(1)
ANTS(GST)A 1999 79-20(2)
ANTS(GST)A 1999 Div 11
ANTS(GST)A 1999 Div 15
ANTS(GST)A 1999 Div 70
ANTS(GST)A 1999 Div 72
ANTS(GST)A 1999 Div 84
ANTS(GST)A 1999 Div 129

Other References:
GST governance and record keeping

PCG 2019/8 history
  Date: Version: Change:
You are here 18 December 2019 Draft guideline  
  25 September 2020 Updated guideline