Income tax: if a taxpayer claims a deduction for self education expenses under subsection 51(1), is the amount of $250 spent, but disallowed as a deduction under section 82A, excluded from the substantiation provisions?
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.This document has changed over time. View its history.
FOI status:may be releasedFOI number: I 1215049
|This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20).|
Example: A taxpayer spends $1500 on self education. An amount of $250 is disallowed as a deduction under s82A. If the taxpayer claims $1250 as self education expenses, he/she must be able to substantiate $1250 with the necessary documentary evidence. Whilst there is no requirements to substantiate the amount of $250, the taxpayer must be able to provide a detailed explanation in regards to this expenditure.
Commissioner of Taxation
onus of proof;