ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2001/196 (Withdrawn)

Goods and Services Tax

GST and Supply of patient records under a subpoena
FOI status: may be released
CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is the entity, a medical practitioner, making a taxable supply under section 9-5 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act), when it provides patient records in accordance with a subpoena?

Decision

Yes, the entity is making a taxable supply under section 9-5 of the GST Act when it provides patient records in accordance with a subpoena.

Facts

The entity is a medical practitioner (as defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act). The entity provides patient records, in accordance with a subpoena. The entity is not a party to the litigation. It provides the patient records in its capacity as an expert witness. The entity does not attend court during the proceedings.

The entity is neither an 'Australian government agency' (as defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act) nor an employee of an Australian government agency.

The entity receives a monetary fee (known as 'production money') for providing the patient's records. There is no medicare benefit payable for the service that the entity is providing.

The entity is registered for goods and services tax (GST). The entity is making the supply of patient records in Australia.

Reasons For Decision

Under section 9-5 of the GST Act, an entity is making a taxable supply if:

(a)
the entity makes the supply for consideration; and
(b)
the supply is made in the course or furtherance of any enterprise that the entity carries on; and
(c)
the supply is connected with Australia; and
(d)
the entity is registered, or required to be registered for GST.

In this case, the supply takes place in Australia and is therefore connected with Australia (as per paragraph 9-5(c) of the GST Act). Furthermore, as the entity is registered for GST (as per paragraph 9-5(d) of the GST Act), the question at issue is whether the supply by the entity is made for consideration and is in the course or furtherance of the entity's enterprise (as per paragraphs 9-5(a) and 9-5(b) of the GST Act).

It is considered that where an entity is required to produce documents or give evidence that relates to an enterprise that it conducts, the production of those documents or the giving of evidence will also be in the course or furtherance of the enterprise. In the practice of medicine, this commonly occurs in two situations. An entity may be required to produce medical records of treatment provided to a patient; or it may be required to give expert medical evidence. Generally, payments for or connected with that supply, including payments of 'production money', will be consideration for that supply.

However, under the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) (Exempt Taxes, Fees and Charges) Determination 2000 made pursuant to Division 81 of the GST Act, some payments to professional or expert witnesses for evidence supplied in accordance with a subpoena will not be 'consideration' (as per paragraph 9-5(a) of the GST Act), where the professional or expert witness is an Australian government agency (as defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act).

In this case, this exception does not apply because the entity is not an Australian government agency. Therefore, as the entity is making a supply for consideration in the course or furtherance of its enterprise as a medical practitioner, when it provides patient records to a court in accordance with a subpoena; the supply meets the positive limbs of section 9-5 of the GST Act.

However, the negative limb of section 9-5 of the GST Act provides that a supply is not a taxable supply to the extent that it is GST-free or input taxed. Of most relevance to this case is section 38-7 of the GST Act, which provides that a supply of a 'medical service' is GST-free. 'Medical service' is defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act to mean:

a service for which medicare benefit is payable under Part II of the Health Insurance Act 1973; or
any other service supplied by or on behalf of a medical practitioner or approved pathology practitioner that is generally accepted in the medical profession as being necessary for the appropriate treatment of the recipient of the supply.

In this case, there is no medicare benefit payable for the supply made by the entity. Therefore, the question at issue is whether the entity is making a supply that is generally accepted in the medical profession as being necessary for the appropriate treatment of the recipient of the supply, as per the second limb of the definition of medical service in section 195-1 of the GST Act.

Section 195-1 of the GST Act defines 'recipient', in relation to a supply, as the entity to which the supply is made. In this case, the recipient of the supply is not the patient of the medical practitioner but rather a third party (i.e., the party that requested the subpoena).

'Appropriate treatment' of a recipient is not defined in the GST Act. However, it is considered that appropriate treatment will be established where a practitioner assesses the recipient's state of health and determines a process to pursue in an attempt to preserve, restore or improve the physical or psychological wellbeing of the recipient.

Accordingly, when the entity provides patient records to a court in accordance with a subpoena, the entity is not supplying appropriate treatment to the recipient of the supply. As such, the entity is not making a GST-free supply under section 38-7 of the GST Act.

In this case, the entity is registered for GST and the supply satisfies the other positive limbs of section 9-5 of the GST Act. Furthermore, as the supply is neither GST-free under Division 38 of the GST Act nor input taxed under Division 40 of the GST Act; the entity is making a taxable supply under section 9-5 of the GST Act.

Date of decision:  13 June 2001

Legislative References:
A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999
   section 9-5
   paragraph 9-5(a)
   paragraph 9-5(b)
   paragraph 9-5(c)
   paragraph 9-5(d)
   Division 38
   section 38-7
   Division 40
   Division 81
   section 195-1

Health Insurance Act 1973
   Part II

Other References:
A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) (Exempt Taxes, Fees and Charges) Determination 2000
Health Industry Issues Register issue 1.a.1

Keywords
Goods & services tax
GST free
GST health
Medical services
GST supplies & acquisitions
GST consideration
GST enterprise
Taxable supply

Business Line:  GST

Date of publication:  14 August 2001

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  13 June 2001 Original statement
You are here 4 May 2007 Archived

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).