ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2001/615

Income Tax

Deductibility of travel insurance
FOI status: may be released

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.


CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is the taxpayer entitled to a deduction for travel insurance under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997).

Decision

No. The taxpayer is not entitled to a deduction for travel insurance under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 as the expenditure is private in nature.

Facts

The taxpayer was granted an International Teaching Fellowship in Canada.

The taxpayer incurred expenses for airfares and travel insurance.

Reasons for Decision

Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature.

In Case T78 86 ATC 1094 the Administrative Appeals Tribunal allowed a deduction to a barrister for airfares to attend a work-related course. However, the Tribunal held that his claim for travel insurance was expenditure of a private and domestic nature. Expenses such as insurance policies invariably cover items that are generally private in nature, for example illness, loss of baggage, and theft or damage to belongings.

The taxpayer is therefore not entitled to a deduction for travel insurance under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 as the expenditure is private in nature.

Date of decision:  23 July 2001

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2000

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 8-1

Case References:
Case T78
   86 ATC 1094

Keywords
Overseas travel expenses

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  DW249228

Business Line:  Small Business/Individual Taxpayers

Date of publication:  22 November 2001

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
You are here 23 July 2001 Original statement
  21 February 2014 Updated statement

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).