ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2001/69 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Operating Lease on Motor Vehicle
FOI status: may be released
CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Whether an operating lease for a motor vehicle entered into by a taxpayer is a lease for taxation purposes. If the retail cost price of the car is greater than the relevant car depreciation limit, whether the car is a 'luxury car' as defined in Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Schedule 2E , section 42A-120 even though the total rent payable under the lease is less than the depreciation limit.

Decision

The operating lease is a lease for taxation purposes and the car is a 'luxury car' as defined in Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Schedule 2E, section 42A-120

Facts

The taxpayer enters into a fixed term arm's length operating lease for a motor car after 20 August 1996. The lease is a genuine operating lease: the lessee has no right nor any expectation to purchase the car at the end of the lease, there is no residual value, and the lessor bears any economic loss on disposal. The lease is not a 'short term hiring agreement' as defined in Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Schedule 2E, section 42A-115. The retail market value of the car is in excess of the relevant car depreciation limit (Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 42-80), however, the total rent payable under the lease is less than the car depreciation limit. The lease does not state an amount as the cost or value of the car for the purposes of the lease.

Reasons For Decision

A genuine operating lease is a lease for legal, taxation and accounting purposes. A genuine operating lease does not need to comply with the guidelines set out in Taxation Ruling IT 28 to be a lease for taxation purposes. The guidelines contained in Taxation Ruling IT 28 are directed towards finance leases. Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section Schedule 2E, section 42A-120 provides that a 'leased car' is a 'luxury car' if, had the lessee bought the car from the owner for an amount equal to the amount set out in Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Schedule 2E, paragraph 42A-20(1)(b) at the first time when the owner granted a lease of the car, the cost of the car for depreciation purposes would have been reduced by the operation of Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 42-80 (which sets out the car depreciation limit). Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Schedule 2E, section 42A-115 defines 'leased car' to mean a motor car of which a lease has been granted. This definition of 'leased car' applies equally to cars leased under finance leases and cars leased under operating leases.

The amount set out in Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Schedule 2E, paragraph 42A-20(1)(b) is the amount the lessee could reasonably be expected to have paid for the purchase of the car if the lessor actually sold the car to the lessee when the lease was granted, and the lessor and lessee dealt with each other at arm's length in connection with the sale. This amount is to be ascertained by reference to the time 'when' the lease was granted. 'When' the lease was granted in this context should be interpreted as meaning the time immediately before the lease was granted. The amount the lessee would have paid for the car accordingly is equal to the retail market value of the car at the time immediately before the lease was granted (i.e., the retail market value of the unencumbered car).

The amount the lessee would have paid for the car is not the retail market value of the car taking into account the fact that the car is being leased. The purpose of the legislation is to determine the value of the car, not the value of the reversionary leasehold interest of the lessor in the car, nor the value of the rights conferred upon the lessee pursuant to the lease.

As the retail market value of the car is in excess of the relevant car depreciation limit, the car is a luxury car for the purposes of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Schedule 2E, section 42A-120 .

Date of decision:  16 April 1999

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   Schedule 2E
   paragraph 42A-20(1)(b)
   section 42A-115
   section 42A-120

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 42-80

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
IT 28

Keywords
Leasing
Vehicle leasing and hire

Business Line:  Private Groups and High Wealth Individuals

Date of publication:  15 June 2001

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  16 April 1999 Original statement
You are here 4 July 2014 Archived

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).