ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2002/353

Income Tax

Medical Expenses Tax Offset - herbal medication not purchased from a chemist
FOI status: may be released

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.


CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is the taxpayer entitled to claim the medical expenses tax offset under section 159P of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) for expenses incurred in the purchase of herbal medication from a health food store?

Decision

Yes. The taxpayer is entitled to claim the medical expenses tax offset under section 159P of the ITAA 1936 as the purchase of herbal medication from a health food store qualifies as a medical expense.

Facts

The taxpayer suffers from a neurological disorder. The progress of the illness is monitored by a specialist medical practitioner.

The taxpayer was ordered to undergo treatment with herbal medication prescribed by a legally qualified specialist medical practitioner for the purpose of managing the illness and reducing its symptoms.

The taxpayer incurred expenditure on herbal medication. Some of the herbal medications were purchased from a health food store and a local supermarket.

The amount of medical expenses incurred by the taxpayer, after reimbursements from Medicare and health fund, exceeded $1250.

Reasons for Decision

A medical expense tax offset is available to a taxpayer under section 159P of the ITAA 1936, where the taxpayer incurs medical expenses for themselves or a dependant who is an Australian resident. The medical expenses tax offset is only available if the amount of medical expenses (reduced by any entitlement to reimbursement from a health fund or government authority) exceeds $1250. The tax offset is 20% of the amount by which the net medical expenses exceeds $1250.

Medical expenses are defined in subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936 to include a payment 'for therapeutic treatment administered by direction of a legally qualified medical practitioner' (paragraph (d) of the definition).

Therapeutic treatment as a concept is concerned with healing or curing, rather than preventing the need for therapy (Case T67 (1968) 18 TRBD 346; (1967) 14 CTBR (NS) Case 31). Therapeutic treatment involves the exercise of professional skill in the medical field in a way which normally involves the person administering the treatment using drugs or physical or mental processes of one kind or another for the purpose of curing or managing the disease (Case R95 84 ATC 633; (1984) 27 CTBR (NS) Case 148).

The herbal medication was prescribed by the taxpayer's specialist medical practitioner for the purposes of treating, curing or managing the taxpayer's illness. The treatment is concerned with the healing process and involved the exercise of professional skill in the medical field. The progress of the taxpayer's illness, and the effects of the treatment, are monitored by the specialist medical practitioner. The herbal medication is considered therapeutic treatment within paragraph (d) of the definition of medical expenses in subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936.

The fact that the required herbs or vitamins are purchased from a health food store or supermarket does not affect the chemical composition or physiological effects of a particular herb or vitamin. The source of therapeutic treatment is not usually relevant to the determination of whether the purpose of a treatment is to heal, cure or manage an illness or disease.

Herbal medication was purchased by the taxpayer from health food stores and supermarkets as 'therapeutic treatment' on direction from a legally qualified specialist medical practitioner. The expenses fall within paragraph (d) of the definition of medical expenses in subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936. As the net medical expenses incurred by the taxpayer exceeded $1250, the taxpayer is entitled to claim the medical expenses tax offset under section 159P of the ITAA 1936.

Date of decision:  26 February 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   section 159P
   subsection 159P(4)

Case References:
Case T67 / Case 31
   (1968) 18 TRBD 346
   (1967) 14 CTBR (NS) 170

Case R95 / Case 148
   84 ATC 633
   (1984) 27 CTBR (NS) 1154

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2001/243
ATO ID 2002/345

Keywords
Dependants
Medical expenses rebates
Rebates

Business Line:  Small Business/Individual Taxpayers

Date of publication:  28 March 2002

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
You are here 26 February 2002 Original statement
  16 April 2010 Archived

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).