ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2003/102 (Withdrawn)
Capital Gains Tax
Capital gains tax: Extension of time to choose the small business roll-overFOI status: may be released
-
This ATO ID is withdrawn because it involves the exercise of a discretion.
This ATO ID has been amended as part of a review of when a choice can be made for the small business rollover.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
Status of this decision: Decision Withdrawn 11 December 2009
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Will the Commissioner allow further time under paragraph 103-25(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) for a taxpayer to choose the small business roll-over in Subdivision 152-E of the ITAA 1997, if the taxpayer previously included a capital gain in their income tax return without any consideration of the small business capital gains tax (CGT) concessions in Division 152 of the ITAA 1997?
Decision
Yes. In the particular circumstances described, the Commissioner will allow further time under paragraph 103-25(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 for the taxpayer to choose the small business roll-over in Subdivision 152-E of the ITAA 1997.
Facts
The taxpayer made a capital gain after 21 September 1999 on the disposal of goodwill in the 1999-2000 income year.
Due to an oversight by the taxpayer's former tax agent, the small business CGT concessions in Division 152 of the ITAA 1997 were not considered and the whole of the capital gain was returned in the taxpayer's income tax return. The taxpayer's new tax agent detected this oversight and almost immediately notified the Commissioner. The taxpayer would now like to choose the small business roll-over in Subdivision 152-E of the ITAA 1997 to apply after the small business 50% reduction has applied to the capital gain. The taxpayer satisfies the basic conditions under Subdivision 152-A of the ITAA 1997 and the requirements for small business roll-over under section 152-410 of the ITAA 1997.
Reasons for Decision
The general rule is that a choice available under the CGT provisions, once made, can not be changed. Generally, such a choice must be made by the time the income tax return is lodged, or within such further time as the Commissioner allows (subsection 103-25(1) of the ITAA 1997).
A taxpayer who has considered the application of the CGT concessions and chosen a particular concession has made a choice which cannot later be changed. However, a taxpayer who did not consider the CGT concessions and accordingly included a capital gain in their income tax return has not made a choice and can, if the Commissioner allows further time, later make a choice for a CGT concession and amend their return to reduce or disregard the capital gain.
In determining if the discretion to allow further time would be exercised, the Commissioner has considered the following factors:
-
- evidence of an acceptable explanation for the period of extension requested (and whether it would be fair and equitable in the circumstances to provide such an extension),
-
- prejudice to the Commissioner which may result from the additional time being allowed (but the mere absence of prejudice is not enough to justify the granting of an extension),
-
- unsettling of people, other than the Commissioner, or of established practices,
-
- fairness to people in like positions and the wider public interest,
-
- whether any mischief is involved, and
-
- consequences of the decision.
The choice was not made within the required time only because of an oversight by the taxpayer's former tax agent in the preparation of the income tax return. The taxpayer's new tax agent detected the oversight and almost immediately notified the Commissioner.
Having considered the relevant factors above, against the taxpayer's circumstances, it would be reasonable for the Commissioner to allow an extension of time for the taxpayer to make a choice for the small business roll-over to apply to the capital gain made on the disposal of goodwill.
Date of decision: 20 September 2002Year of income: Year ending 30 June 2002
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Part 3-1
Part 3-3
section 103-25
paragraph 103-25(1)(b)
section 152-410
ATO ID 2003/103
ATO ID 2003/104
ATO ID 2002/739
ATO ID 2002/740
ATO ID 2002/745
ATO ID 2002/792
Keywords
Capital gains tax
Commissioner's discretion
Extension of time
Small business roll-over
CGT choice
ISSN: 1445-2782
| Date: | Version: | |
| 20 September 2002 | Original statement | |
| You are here → | 11 December 2009 | Archived |
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
