ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2003/1066
Income Tax
Structured Settlement: overseas court order - Division 54FOI status: may be released
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Does an overseas court order satisfy the requirements of a court order under Division 54 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?
Decision
Yes. The court order satisfies the requirements of a court order under Division 54 of the ITAA 1997.
Facts
A child was born with severe disabilities and has associated learning difficulties.
An overseas court awarded damages to the child.
The parents decided to emigrate to Australia. The overseas court order was made to enable transfer of the damages to Australia. The court order specifies an amount of damages to be awarded by way of a structured settlement.
Reasons for Decision
The term 'court order' is not defined in the ITAA 1997, so is given its ordinary meaning.
In the context of this case, the word 'court' is defined in The Macquarie Dictionary 2001 rev. 3rd edn, The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, NSW as 'a place where justice is administered'. As there is no suggestion that the term is confined to courts established within the boundaries of a particular country, a settlement obtained after the decision of a court in an overseas jurisdiction may fall for consideration under Division 54 of the ITAA 1997. 'Order' is defined in The Macquarie Dictionary as an authoritarian direction, injunction, command, or mandate.
The requirement for a structured settlement under paragraph 54-10(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997 is for a written agreement between the parties (whether or not that agreement is approved by an order of a court, or is embodied in a consent order made by a court). The document which has been quoted in part in the facts of this case satisfies this provision.
Date of decision: 18 October 2003Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2004
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Division 54
paragraph 54-10(1)(d)
Other References:
The Macquarie Dictionary 2001 rev. 3rd edn, The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, NSW
Explanatory Memorandum to Taxation Laws Amendment (Structured Settlements and Structured Orders) Act 2002
Keywords
Courts
Legal Orders
ISSN: 1445-2782
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
