ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/279

Income Tax

Non Commercial Losses: Assessable income test - whether an increase in the value of trading stock on hand for an income year is assessable income 'from' the business activity.
FOI status: may be released

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is the amount that is included in assessable income under subsection 70-35(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), where the value of closing trading stock is greater than the value of opening stock, assessable income 'from' the business activity when:

(a): applying the loss deferral rule in subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997; or
(b): determining whether the Assessable income test in section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997 has been satisfied?

Decision

Yes. The amount that is included in assessable income by subsection 70-35(2) of the ITAA 1997 is assessable income 'from' the business activity for the purposes of applying either:

subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997; or

section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997.

Facts

An individual taxpayer conducted a business activity during the income year ending 30 June 2002. The expenses incurred that were attributable to that business activity exceeded the assessable income derived from general trading in that year.

The taxpayer undertook a stock take at the end of the income year to determine the value of trading stock on hand.

As the value of the trading stock on hand at the end of the income year was greater than the value of the opening stock for that year, subsection 70-35(2) of the ITAA 1997 included the increase in the value in the taxpayer's assessable income for that income year.

Reasons for Decision

Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity carried on by a taxpayer who is an individual, unless:

•: their business activity satisfies one of the four tests in Division 35; or
•: the Commissioner has exercised the discretion in section 35-55 for the activity; or
•: the individual comes within the Exception to Division 35, contained in subsection 35-10(4).

(refer subsection 35-10(1) of the ITAA 1997)

One of the four tests is the Assessable income test in section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997, which provides that the loss deferral rule in section 35-10 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply for an income year where the assessable income 'from' the business activity in question 'is at least $20,000'.

If none of the conditions in subsection 35-10(1) of the ITAA 1997 are satisfied, the loss deferral rule applies. Consequently, the taxpayer is required to calculate the amount of their non-commercial loss, for the purposes of subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997, that is deferred. The amount of this 'loss' is calculated as the excess of their otherwise allowable deductions for this income year, attributable to the business activity, over any assessable income 'from' this activity. The deferred amount cannot be taken into account when calculating their taxable income for the income year in question.

Whether an amount of income is 'from' a business activity, depends on whether that activity is the source or origin of that income, applying the ordinary meaning of 'from' (see BHP Petroleum (Timor Sea) Pty Ltd & Ors v. Minister for Resources (1994) 49 FCR 155 (1994) 28 ATR 16), or whether that income is an incident of carrying that activity on (see Kidston Goldmines Ltd v. FC of T (1991) 30 FCR 77; 91 ATC 4538; (1991) 22 ATR 168, in the context of paragraph 23(o) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, and whether income is 'from the working of a mining property').

The increase in the value of the taxpayer's trading stock is income that is sourced in, originating from, and incidental to the carrying on of the business activity. The use of this type of asset is a recognised and accepted incident of carrying on that sort of business and therefore the increase in the value of the trading stock has its source or origin in the conduct of the business activity.

The increase in the value of the taxpayer's trading stock is statutory income and only brought to account by the operation of subsection 70-35(2) of the ITAA 1997. Nevertheless, trading stock are the things in which a business trades which creates the causal relationship between the income and the business activity.

For these reasons, the taxpayer's assessable income, in the form of the increase in the value of trading stock, is assessable income 'from' the business activity for the purposes of subsection 35-10(2) and section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997.

Date of decision: 18 March 2003

Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   Division 35
   section 35-10
   section 35-30
   section 35-35
   section 35-40
   section 35-45
   section 35-55
   subsection 35-10(2)
   subsection 35-10(4)
   paragraph 35-55(1)(b)
   subsection 70-35(2)

Case References:
Kidston Goldmines Ltd v. FC of T
   (1991) 30 FCR 77
   (1991) 91 ATC 4538
   22 ATR 168.

BHP Petroleum (Timor Sea) Pty Ltd & Ors v. Minister for Resources
(1994) 49 FCR 155
(1994) 28 ATR 16

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Taxation Ruling TR 2001/14

Keywords
Primary production losses
Commissioner's discretion
Non commercial losses
Carry forward non commercial losses

Business Line: Business and Personal Taxes Centre of Expertise

Date of publication: 16 May 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782

history

	Date:	Version:
You are here	18 March 2003	Original statement
	9 April 2010	Archived

Copyright notice

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).