ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/352 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Assessability of a lump sum compensation payment received for cessation of an assessable allowance
FOI status: may be released

This ATO ID is withdrawn as the ATO view of this matter is dealt with in Taxation Determination TD 93/58

This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Does a lump sum payment received by a taxpayer, as compensation for the cessation of an assessable allowance, form part of their assessable income under subsection 25(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Decision

Yes. A lump sum payment received by a taxpayer as compensation for the cessation of an assessable allowance forms part of their assessable income under subsection 25(1) of the ITAA 1936.

Facts

The taxpayer carries on a business.

The taxpayer had for many years received an allowance from another entity. The allowance was paid to defray certain of the taxpayer's operational costs. The taxpayer had correctly included this allowance in their assessable income in prior years.

The other entity decided to cease paying the allowance to the taxpayer. The taxpayer and the other entity signed a deed under which the taxpayer agreed to accept a lump sum payment as compensation for the cessation of the allowance.

The lump sum was received by the taxpayer in the 1995-96 income year.

Reasons for Decision

Subsection 25(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides that the assessable income of a resident taxpayer includes gross income derived directly or indirectly from all sources whether in or out of Australia. Gross income in subsection 25(1) of the ITAA 1936 means income according to ordinary concepts and usages.

The allowances paid to the taxpayer were received in the course of, and as an ordinary incident of, the conduct of their business. These amounts were income according to ordinary concepts and formed part of the taxpayer's assessable income in the years in which they were received.

The general principle of classifying compensation payments is the replacement principle, that is compensation payments will be income where they replace revenue items and they will be capital where they replace capital items. An amount paid to compensate for loss generally acquires the character of that for which it is substituted (Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Dixon (1952) 86 CLR 540; (1952) 5 ATR 443; 10 ATD 82). Compensation payments which substitute income have been held by the courts to be income under ordinary concepts (FC of T v. Inkster 89 ATC 5142; (1989) 20 ATR 1516; Tinkler v. FC of T 79 ATC 4641; (1979) 10 ATR 411).

The allowance had been returned as assessable income in previous years by the taxpayer. The compensation payment made to the taxpayer was to replace this income amount. It did not seek to compensate the taxpayer for the surrender of abandonment of part of it's business and therefore was not a payment of a capital nature.

Accordingly, the lump sum payment received by the taxpayer as compensation for the cessation of an allowance is assessable under subsection 25(1) of the ITAA 1936.

(Note: the lump sum payment may also have been assessable under paragraph 26(g) of the ITAA 1936 as a bounty or subsidy)

Date of decision: 6 March 2003

Year of income: Year ended 30 June 1996

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
subsection 25(1)
paragraph 26(g)

Case References:
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Dixon
   (1952) 86 CLR 540
   (1952) 5 ATR 443
   10 ATD 82

FC of T v. Inkster
89 ATC 5142
(1989) 20 ATR 1516

Tinkler v. FC of T
79 ATC 4641
(1979) 10 ATR 411

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2003/353
ATO ID 2003/354
ATO ID 2003/355

Keywords
Compensation income
Lump sum payments
Commutation

Business Line: Business and Personal Taxes Centre of Expertise

Date of publication: 15 May 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782

history

	Date:	Version:
	6 March 2003	Original statement
You are here	10 February 2006	Archived

Copyright notice

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).