ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/384 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Capital Allowances: cost to employee of depreciating asset given by employer
FOI status: may be released
Status of this decision: Decision withdrawn 24 March 2017.
CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is the cost, under Subdivision 40-C of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), of a depreciating asset held by the taxpayer nil if the asset was given to the taxpayer by their employer primarily for the purposes of their employment and for no contribution by the taxpayer?

Decision

Yes. The cost, under Subdivision 40-C of the ITAA 1997, of the depreciating asset held by the taxpayer is nil because a cost is not specified in subsection 40-180(2) and because no amount is taken to be its cost under section 40-185 of the ITAA 1997.

Facts

The taxpayer required a particular depreciating asset to carry out their duties as an employee. The employer provided the taxpayer with the asset on the basis that it was treated as a property fringe benefit. The asset was not provided pursuant to an effective salary sacrifice agreement and the taxpayer did not make any contribution towards its cost. The taxpayer uses the depreciating asset primarily for a taxable purpose.

Reasons for Decision

Section 40-25 of the ITAA 1997 provides that a holder of a depreciating asset can deduct an amount equal to the decline in value of the asset to the extent it is used for a taxable purpose. Decline in value is based, in part, on the cost of the depreciating asset.

Cost consists of two elements, first and second element, and is worked out under Subdivision 40-C of ITAA 1997. The first element of cost is worked out as at the time when the asset starts to be held. The second element of cost is worked out after that time.

The first element of cost is either an amount specified in the table in subsection 40-180(2) of the ITAA 1997 for particular circumstances or the amount taken to have been paid under section 40-185 of the ITAA 1997 for general circumstances.

None of the items listed in subsection 40-180(2) of the ITAA 1997 apply to the circumstances of this case. In particular, the provision of the asset by the employer to the taxpayer for the primary purpose of carrying out their employment duties is an arm's length arrangement (item 8) and is not a private or domestic arrangement (item 9).

In addition, there is no amount, liability or non-cash benefit that is referable to the taxpayer starting to hold the asset. In these circumstances, there is also no amount taken to be the asset's cost under section 40-185 of the ITAA 1997.

The first element of cost of the asset to the taxpayer is, therefore, nil.

NOTE: This ATO Interpretative Decision does not apply to depreciating assets that are eligible work related items for the purposes of section 58X of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (portable electronic devices, computer software, briefcases, protective clothing and tools of trade used primarily in the taxpayer's employment) and are acquired after 7.30pm by legal time in the ACT on 13 May 2008 because subsection 40-45(1) of the ITAA 1997 has effect to prevent Division 40 of the ITAA 1997 (including the cost rules in Subdivision 40-C of the ITAA 1997) from applying to them.

Amendment History

Date of Amendment Part Comment
7 March 2016 Reasons for Decision Correct spelling error.
Legislative references Updated.
23 April 2010 Reasons for Decision Amended to improve clarity.
Related public rulings Updated.
Related ATO IDs Updated.

Date of decision:  24 April 2003

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   Division40
   section 40-25
   section 40-45(1)
   subsection 40-180(2)
   section 40-185
   Subdivision 40-C

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986
   section 58X

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Tax Determination TD 93/145 (withdrawn)

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2003/184 (withdrawn) ATO ID 2004/559

Business Line:  Individuals

Date of publication:  23 May 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  24 April 2003 Original statement
  7 March 2016 Updated statement
You are here → 24 March 2017 Archived

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).