ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/973

Income Tax

Debt deduction: interest paid on convertible notes
FOI status: may be released
CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Are periodic payments made by the company on convertible notes a debt deduction within the meaning of subsection 820-40(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Decision

Yes. The payments made by the company constitute a debt deduction as they are a cost incurred that satisfies:

subparagraph 820-40(1)(a)(i) [interest, an amount in the nature of interest, or any other amount that is calculated by reference to the time value of money], and
paragraph 820-40(1)(b) [apart from Division 820, the cost is deductible for the year of income] of the ITAA 1997.

Facts

An Australian resident company has raised capital by issuing unsecured notes (notes).

The notes were issued on the following terms:

Each note has a face value of $1.00 and was issued on subscription of an amount equal to that face value
The notes have a term of four years and are repayable in four equal instalments on each anniversary date of the issue
The company is liable to make interest payments on the portion of the notes that remains outstanding at any time, calculated at the rate of 10% per annum on the amortised face value outstanding

The issue of the notes gives rise to a debt interest under Division 974 of the ITAA 1997.

The capital raised by the notes is applied by the company in the refinancing of funds employed in the company's business.

Reasons for Decision

A debt deduction is defined by subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 as having the meaning given by section 820-40 of the ITAA 1997.

Under section 820-40 of the ITAA 1997 a debt deduction of an entity for an income year includes a cost incurred that is:

interest
an amount in the nature of interest, or
any other amount that is calculated by reference to the time value of money

and which would be, apart from the operation of Division 820 of the ITAA 1997, deductible for the year of income.

There is not a general definition of 'interest' in the ITAA 1997. In considering its ordinary meaning, interest was described by Rowlatt J in Bennett v. Ogston (HM Inspector of Taxes)(1930) 15 TC 374 at 379 as being 'payment by time for the use of money'.

The payments made by the company are compensation for the delay in repayment of the consideration for the acquisition of the preference shares and as such are considered to be interest payments.

Apart from Division 820 of the ITAA 1997 (about Thin Capitalisation) the payment of interest on funds employed in the business of the company, or in the refinancing of such funds, would be deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.

For these reasons, the periodic payments made by the company on convertible notes are a debt deduction within the meaning of subsection 820-40(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Date of decision:  9 October 2003

Year of income:  Year ending 30 June 2004

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 820-40
   subsection 820-40(1)
   subparagraph 820-40(1)(a)(i)
   paragraph 820-40(1)(b)
   subsection 995-1(1)
   section 8-1

Case References:
Bennett v. Ogston (HM Inspector of Taxes)
   (1930) 15 TC 374

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Taxation Ruling TR 95/25

Keywords
Debt interest
Debt equity borderline

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  3725751

Business Line:  Public Groups and International

Date of publication:  31 October 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).