ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2004/43 (Withdrawn)
Income Tax
Consolidation: capital gains tax - CGT small business retirement exemption - controlling individual testFOI status: may be released
-
This ATO ID is superseded by Taxation Determinations TD 2004/39 and TD 2004/40This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
For the purpose of applying the small business retirement exemption, is the controlling individual condition in paragraph 152-305(2)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) applied to the head company of a consolidated group rather than the subsidiary member of the group that actually sells an asset?
Decision
Yes. The effect of the single entity rule in subsection 701-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 is that the controlling individual condition in paragraph 152 305(2)(b) of the ITAA 1997 is applied to the head company of a consolidated group for the purposes of the small business retirement exemption.
Facts
All the shares in H Co are owned by an individual. H Co is the head company of a consolidated group consisting of H Co and Sub Co. Sub Co carries on a small business.
In the 2004 income year Sub Co sold an asset. For the purposes of working out H Co's liability to income tax for that income year, H Co is taken to have sold the asset and made a capital gain. H Co wishes to treat the capital gain as exempt under the small business retirement exemption in Subdivision 152 D of the ITAA 1997.
H Co satisfies all of the basic conditions in section 152-10 of the ITAA 1997.
Reasons for Decision
Apart from the basic conditions in section 152-10 of the ITAA 1997, a company wishing to claim the small business retirement exemption (in this case the head company of the consolidated group) must satisfy the controlling individual test: paragraph 152-305(2)(b) of the ITAA 1997.
The controlling individual test is satisfied if the company had at least one controlling individual just before the CGT event: section 152-50 of the ITAA 1997. An individual is a controlling individual of a company if, at that time, the individual holds the legal and equitable interest in shares, other than redeemable shares, that carry the right to exercise at least 50% of the voting power in the company and receive at least 50% of any dividend or distribution of capital the company may pay: subsection 152-55(1) of the ITAA 1997.
If Sub Co were not a member of a consolidated group it would not qualify for the retirement exemption because it could not satisfy the controlling individual test (all the shares in Sub Co being owned by H Co).
An issue arises as to whether the single entity rule in subsection 701-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 affects the application of the controlling individual test for entities that are part of a consolidated group. Under the single entity rule, subsidiary members of a consolidated group are taken to be parts of the head company and not separate entities when working out the group's income tax liability or loss. This means that actions of subsidiaries are treated as actions of the head company for the purposes of working out the income tax liability or losses of a consolidated group.
Therefore, the controlling individual test must be applied to the group's head company with the result, in this case, that H Co satisfies the test in section 152-50 of the ITAA 1997 and will be able to claim the small business retirement exemption to the capital gain made on the disposal of the asset.
The result in this case, while different from that which would arise had Sub Co not been a member of a consolidated group, is consistent with the fundamental principles underpinning the consolidation regime.
Date of decision: 24 December 2003Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2004
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Subdivision 152-D
section 152-10
section 152-50
subsection 152-55(1)
paragraph 152-305(2)(b)
subsection 701-1(1)
Keywords
Capital gains tax
CGT small business relief
Consolidation
Consolidation - capital gains tax
Single entity rule
Small business retirement exemption
ISSN: 1445-2782
| Date: | Version: | |
| 24 December 2003 | Original statement | |
| You are here | 14 July 2004 | Archived |
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
