ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2004/91 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Income tax: Transfer from a share capital account - excluded transfer - anticipated loss on the planned sale of an asset
FOI status: may be released

This ATO ID is withdrawn from the database because it contains a view in respect of a provision of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 that doesn't apply after the 2006-2007 income year. Despite its withdrawal from the database, this ATO Interpretative Decision continues to be a precedential view in respect of decisions for income years up to, and including, the 2006-2007 income year.

This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

Status of this decision: Decision Withdrawn 14 January 2011

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Will a transfer from a company's share capital account to reflect the anticipated loss on the planned sale of an asset be an 'excluded transfer' for the purposes of subsection 46J(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Decision

No. Where a company makes a transfer out of its share capital account to reflect the anticipated loss on the planned sale of an asset, the transfer will not be an 'excluded transfer' for the purposes of subsection 46J(2) of the ITAA 1936.

Facts

A company plans to sell an asset and expects to realise a loss upon that sale. It revalues the asset and debits the reduction in value against its Retained Profits account. On the expectation of this loss being realised, the company transfers an amount from its share capital account to its Retained Profits account to reflect the value that it expects will no longer be represented by assets.

Reasons for Decision

Section 46M of the ITAA 1936 operates to deny frankability to dividends to the extent that they are:

•: debited from a company's disqualifying account, or
•: debited from a company's non-disqualifying account to the extent that there is a debit to its notional disqualifying account.

The company's share capital account is a 'disqualifying account' (subsection 46H(1) of the ITAA 1936). A 'non-disqualifying account' is any account that is not a disqualifying account (subsection 46H(3) of the ITAA 1936). The company's 'notional disqualifying account' is credited if the company has transferred money from its share capital account into a non-disqualifying account (subsection 46I(3) of the ITAA 1936). As a result, it will have a surplus in its notional disqualifying account.

When the company pays a dividend from a non-disqualifying account and the notional disqualifying account was in surplus immediately before that payment, there will be a debit to its notional disqualifying account (subsection 46I(5) of the ITAA 1936). To the extent that the dividend is debited from the company's notional disqualifying account, it will not be frankable (subsections 46M(3) and 46M(4) of the ITAA 1936).

Section 46M of the ITAA 1936 does not have this effect, however, if the transfer from the share capital account is an 'excluded transfer' (subsection 46I(3) of the ITAA 1936). In this event, the notional disqualifying account will not be credited by the transfer. A transfer will be an excluded transfer where the disqualifying account is a share capital account and the transfer 'gives effect to a reduction in paid-up share capital that has been permanently lost or has permanently ceased to be represented by assets' (subsection 46J(2) of the ITAA 1936).

A 'permanent loss' is one where the loss has been realised and there is no presently foreseeable prospect of its recovery (Re Jupiter House Investments (Cambridge) Ltd [1985] 1 WLR 975 per Harman J at 979).

In this instance the company has not sold the asset and has not realised a loss. It is foreseeable that the anticipated loss may not be realised. For example, the company may elect not to sell the asset; negotiations for its sale may fall through; or the company may receive a better price than expected. Merely anticipating that a loss will be realised and revaluing an asset to an estimated recoverable amount does not constitute a permanent loss. Accordingly, the transfer is not an excluded transfer for the purposes of subsection 46J(2) of the ITAA 1936.

Date of decision: 23 December 2003

Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2004

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   section 46H
   section 46I
   section 46J
   section 46M

Case References:
Re Jupiter House Investments (Cambridge) Ltd
[1985] 1 WLR 975

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2004/90

Keywords
Capital reductions
Share capital

Business Line: Finance and Investment Centre of Expertise

Date of publication: 30 January 2004

ISSN: 1445-2782

history

	Date:	Version:
	23 December 2003	Original statement
You are here →	14 January 2011	Archived

Copyright notice

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).