ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2005/113

Income Tax

Capital Gains Tax: CGT event C1 - loss of an asset - ostriches - company deregistered
FOI status: may be released

This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

Status of this decision: Decision Current

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Did CGT event C1 under section 104-20 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) happen to a taxpayer who owned ostriches when the company holding the ostriches was deregistered?

Decision

Yes. CGT event C1 under section 104-20 of the ITAA 1997 happened to the taxpayer who owned ostriches when the company holding the ostriches was deregistered.

Facts

The taxpayer owned six ostriches and had entered into an Agistment and Breeding Services Agreement with a company.

The taxpayer paid $10,000 to the company for the management fees and agistment costs associated with the ostriches.

In the 2000-01 income year, after reviewing the information available, the taxpayer concluded that there would never be a return on the investment nor any saleable asset to dispose of. At that time, the taxpayer discontinued the payment of monies to the company.

In 2001-02 income year, the company was deregistered. All assets of the company were liquidated but no payment was paid to unsecured creditors. The taxpayer had taken no action during liquidation to recover their property or any distribution.

The taxpayer does not know what happened to the ostriches when payment of the management and agistment fees ceased.

Reasons for Decision

Under section 104-20 of the ITAA 1997 CGT event C1 happens if a CGT asset you own is lost or destroyed.

A CGT asset is defined as any kind of property or a legal or equitable right that is not property (section 108-5 of the ITAA 1997).

The CGT asset in this case is the six ostriches. The taxpayer owned the ostriches but the company had possession and control of the ostriches.

The word 'lost' in subsection 104-20(1) of the ITAA 1997 is not defined and takes its ordinary meaning. Taxation Determination TD 1999/79 states that the meaning of the word 'lose' in the context of subsection 104-20(1) ('lost' being the past tense of lose) is 'to come to be without, by some chance, and not know the whereabouts of: to lose a ring'.

Paragraph 3 of TD 1999/79 says that the word 'lost' is wide enough to cover some situations where an asset is confiscated. However, other situations involving confiscation may amount to a change of ownership under CGT event A1, so that the circumstances of each case determine the relevant CGT event.

Because the company did not give back the ostriches to the taxpayer and was subsequently liquidated and deregistered, the taxpayer had no means of knowing what had happened to their property. Even if they had located the property held by the company they would have had no means of knowing which ostriches were theirs. They had no means of knowing whether the ostriches had been destroyed, or whether there had been a change of ownership of them by confiscation.

CGT event C1 therefore happened as the taxpayer had lost their ostriches when the company was deregistered.

Under subsection 104-20(2) of the ITAA 1997 the time of CGT event C1 is when you first receive compensation for the loss or if you receive no compensation when the loss is discovered. As the taxpayer did not receive any payment or compensation the time of CGT event C1 is when the loss was discovered. This was when the company was deregistered in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 because the company ceased to exist as a legal entity and therefore ceased to hold any property. On deregistration, the taxpayer no longer had any rights to recover their property.

Amendment History

Date of Amendment	Part	Comment
18 August 2017	Facts	Removed irrelevant word and made minor punctuation correction.
1 October 2014	Facts	Exclude immaterial facts.

Date of decision: 27 April 2005

Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2004

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 104-20
   section 108-5
   subsection 104-20(1)
   subsection 104-20(2)

Corporations Act 2001
The Act

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Taxation Determination TD 1999/79

Keywords
Capital gains tax
CGT reduced cost base

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number: 4370892

Business Line: Private Groups and High Wealth Individuals

Date of publication: 6 May 2005
Date reviewed: 18 August 2017

ISSN: 1445-2782

history

	Date:	Version:
	27 April 2005	Original statement
	1 October 2014	Original statement
You are here →	18 August 2017	Updated statement

Copyright notice

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).