ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2005/155
Income Tax
Assessability of employment income received by an Australian Defence Force member serving in Western Samoa with the Pacific Patrol Boat ProjectFOI status: may be released
This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version. |
-
This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Are the salary and wages received by a resident taxpayer while serving as a member of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) in Western Samoa with the Pacific Patrol Boat Project assessable under subsection 6-5(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?
Decision
No. The salary and wages received by a resident taxpayer while serving as a member of the ADF in Western Samoa with the Pacific Patrol Boat Project are not assessable under subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997 as the salary and wages are exempt under subsection 23AG(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).
Facts
The taxpayer is an Australian resident for income tax purposes.
The taxpayer is a member of the ADF.
The taxpayer serves in Western Samoa for a continuous period of not less than 91 days as part of Australia's contribution to the Pacific Patrol Boat Project.
The Pacific Patrol Boat Project is a part of Australia's Defence Cooperation Program. The program's aim is to support Australia's defence relationships in the Pacific region by contributing to the maintenance of regional security and assisting with the development of security capabilities of various South Pacific countries, including Western Samoa.
The taxpayer receives salary and wages from the ADF while serving in Western Samoa.
A certificate under paragraph 23AD(1)(a) of the ITAA 1936 has not been issued by the Chief of the Defence Force to the effect that the taxpayer is on eligible duty with a specified organisation in a specified area outside Australia.
There is no double tax agreement between Australia and Western Samoa.
The laws of Western Samoa provide for the imposition of income tax on employment income and do not generally exempt such income from income tax.
The taxpayer is not connected with any international organisation or in receipt of any diplomatic or consular privileges or immunities.
Reasons for Decision
Subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the assessable income of a resident taxpayer includes ordinary income derived directly or indirectly from all sources, whether in or out of Australia, during the income year.
Salary and wages are ordinary income for the purposes of subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997.
Subsection 6-15(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that if an amount is exempt income it is not included in assessable income. Section 11-15 of the ITAA 1997 lists those provisions dealing with income which may be exempt. Included in this list is section 23AG of the ITAA 1936 which deals with overseas employment income.
Subsection 23AG(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides that, where a resident taxpayer is engaged in foreign service for a continuous period of not less than 91 days, any foreign earnings derived will be exempt from tax in Australia. 'Foreign service' includes service in a foreign country in the capacity of an employee and 'foreign earnings' includes income consisting of salary and wages (subsection 23AG(7) of the ITAA 1936).
Subsection 23AG(2) of the ITAA 1936 provides that the exemption in subsection 23AG(1) of the ITAA 1936 will not apply where the income is exempt from income tax in the foreign country only because of any of the following reasons:
- (a)
- a law of the foreign country giving effect to a double tax agreement
- (b)
- a double tax agreement
- (c)
- provisions of a law of the foreign country under which income covered by any of the following categories is generally exempt from income tax:
- (i)
- income derived in the capacity of an employee
- (ii)
- income from personal services
- (iii)
- similar income
- (d)
- the law of the foreign country does not provide for the imposition of income tax on one or more of the categories of income mentioned in paragraph (c)
- (e)
- a law of the foreign country corresponding to the International Organizations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963 or to the regulations under that Act
- (f)
- an international agreement to which Australia is a party and that deals with:
- (i)
- diplomatic or consular privileges and immunities
- (ii)
- privileges and immunities in relation to persons connected with international organisations
- (g)
- a law of the foreign country giving effect to an agreement covered by paragraph (f).
Paragraphs 23AG(2)(a) and 23AG(2)(b) of the ITAA 1936 will not apply as there is no double tax agreement between Australia and Western Samoa.
Paragraphs 23AG(2)(c) and 23AG(2)(d) of the ITAA 1936 do not apply as the laws of Western Samoa provide for the imposition of income tax on employment income and do not generally exempt such income from income tax.
The salary and wages received by the taxpayer are not exempt in Western Samoa because of a law (or regulations) of Western Samoa corresponding to the International Organizations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963 and as such paragraph 23AG(2)(e) of the ITAA 1936 does not apply.
Paragraph 23AG(2)(f) and 23AG(2)(g) of the ITAA 1936 do not apply as the process by which Australia participated in the Pacific Patrol Boat Project did not result in Australia becoming a party to an international agreement that deals with diplomatic or consular privileges and immunities.
As none of the reasons listed in subsection 23AG(2) of the ITAA 1936 apply, the salary and wages received by the taxpayer from serving in Western Samoa as part of the Pacific Patrol Boat Project will be exempt from income tax under subsection 23AG(1) of the ITAA 1936.
Accordingly, the salary and wages received by the taxpayer from serving in Western Samoa as part of the Pacific Patrol Boat Project will not be assessable income under subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997.
Date of decision: 15 April 2005Year of income: Year ended 30 June 1997 Year ended 30 June 1998 Year ended 30 June 1999
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
paragraph 23AD(1)(a)
section 23AG
subsection 23AG(1)
subsection 23AG(2)
subsection 23AG(7)
subsection 6-5(2)
subsection 6-15(2)
section 11-15 Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2004/753
ATO ID 2004/770
ATO ID 2004/789
ATO ID 2004/849
Keywords
Defence force members
Defence force overseas service
Exempt income
Foreign income
Foreign salary & wages
International tax
Western Samoa
ISSN: 1445-2782
| Date: | Version: | |
| You are here | 15 April 2005 | Original statement |
| 4 March 2011 | Archived |
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
