ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2005/34 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

Assessability of employment income received by an Australian Defence Force (ADF) member serving in Israel with Operation PALADIN as part of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organisation (UNTSO)
FOI status: may be released
CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Are the salary and wages received by the taxpayer, an ADF member serving in Israel with Operation PALADIN as part of Australia's contribution to UNTSO, assessable under subsection 6-5(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Decision

No. The salary and wages received by the taxpayer, an ADF member serving in Israel with Operation PALADIN as part of Australia's contribution to UNTSO, are not assessable under subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997 as the salary and wages are exempt under subsection 23AG(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).

Facts

The taxpayer is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes.

The taxpayer is a member of the ADF.

The taxpayer served in Israel for a continuous period of not less than 91 days as part of Operation PALADIN.

Operation PALADIN concerned the deployment of ADF members to serve in Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Egypt as part of Australia's contribution to UNTSO.

The taxpayer received salary and wages in relation to that service.

A certificate under paragraph 23AD(1)(a) of the ITAA 1936 has not been issued by the Chief of the Defence Force to the effect that the taxpayer is on eligible duty with a specified organisation in a specified area outside Australia.

There is no double tax agreement between Australia and Israel.

The law of Israel provides for the imposition of income tax on employment income and does not generally exempt such income from income tax.

The salary and wages received by the taxpayer are not exempt in Israel because of a law (or regulations) corresponding to the International Organizations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963 or under an international agreement to which Australia is a party that deals with privileges and immunities relating to diplomatic or consular matters or of persons connected with international organisations.

Reasons for Decision

Subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the assessable income of a resident taxpayer includes ordinary income derived directly or indirectly from all sources, whether in or out of Australia, during the income year.

Salary and wages are ordinary income for the purposes of subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997.

Subsection 6-15(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that if an amount is exempt income it is not included in assessable income. Section 11-15 of the ITAA 1997 lists those provisions dealing with income which may be exempt. Included in this list is section 23AG of the ITAA 1936 which deals with overseas employment income.

Subsection 23AG(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides that where a resident taxpayer is engaged in foreign service for a continuous period of not less than 91 days, any foreign earnings derived will be exempt from tax in Australia. 'Foreign service' includes service in a foreign country in the capacity as an employee and 'foreign earnings' includes income consisting of salary and wages (subsection 23AG(7) of the ITAA 1936).

Subsection 23AG(2) of the ITAA 1936 provides that the exemption in subsection 23AG(1) of the ITAA 1936 will not apply where the income is exempt from income tax in the foreign country only because of any of the following reasons:

(a)
a law of the foreign country giving effect to a double tax agreement
(b)
a double tax agreement
(c)
provisions of a law of the foreign country under which income covered by any of the following categories is generally exempt from income tax:

(i)
income derived in the capacity of an employee
(ii)
income from personal services
(iii)
similar income

(d)
the law of the foreign country does not provide for the imposition of income tax on one or more of the categories of income mentioned in paragraph (c)
(e)
a law of the foreign country corresponding to the International Organizations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963 or to the regulations under that Act
(f)
an international agreement to which Australia is a party and that deals with:

(i)
diplomatic or consular privileges and immunities
(ii)
privileges and immunities in relation to persons connected with international organisations

(g)
a law of the foreign country giving effect to an agreement covered by paragraph (f).

There is no double tax agreement between Australia and Israel. Therefore, paragraphs 23AG(2)(a) and 23AG(2)(b) of the ITAA 1936 do not apply.

Paragraphs 23AG(2)(c) and 23AG(2)(d) of the ITAA 1936 do not apply as the law of Israel provides for the imposition of income tax on employment income and does not generally exempt such income from income tax.

The salary and wages received by the taxpayer were not exempt in Israel because of a law (or regulations) of Israel corresponding to the International Organizations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963 and as such paragraph 23AG(2)(e) of the ITAA 1936 does not apply.

Paragraphs 23AG(2)(f) and 23AG(2)(g) of the ITAA 1936 do not apply as the process by which Australia participated in UNTSO did not result in Australia becoming a party to an international agreement concerning UNTSO.

As none of the reasons listed in subsection 23AG(2) of the ITAA 1936 apply, the salary and wages received by the taxpayer from serving in Israel with Operation PALADIN are exempt from income tax under subsection 23AG(1) of the ITAA 1936 as the taxpayer has been engaged in foreign service for a continuous period of not less than 91 days.

Accordingly, the salary and wages received by the taxpayer will not be assessable income under subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997.

Date of decision:  21 January 2005

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 1998 Year ended 30 June 1999

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   paragraph 23AD(1)(a)
   section 23AG
   subsection 23AG(1)
   subsection 23AG(2)
   paragraph 23AG(2)(a)
   paragraph 23AG(2)(b)
   paragraph 23AG(2)(c)
   paragraph 23AG(2)(d)
   paragraph 23AG(2)(e)
   paragraph 23AG(2)(f)
   subparagraph 23AG(2)(f)(ii)
   paragraph 23AG(2)(g)
   subsection 23AG(7)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   subsection 6-5(2)
   subsection 6-15(2)
   section 11-15

International Organizations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963
   the Act

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2004/604

Keywords
Defence force overseas service
Exempt income
Foreign income
Foreign salary & wages
Israel

Business Line:  Public Groups and International

Date of publication:  28 January 2005

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
  21 January 2005 Original statement
You are here 12 May 2006 Archived

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).