ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2013/15 (Withdrawn)
Income Tax
Deductions and expenses: unpaid present entitlement and bad debt deductionFOI status: may be released
-
This ATO ID is withdrawn and has been replaced by TD 2015/D5 Income tax: is a beneficiary of a trust entitled to a deduction under section 25-35 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) for the amount of an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) to trust income that the beneficiary has purported to write off as a bad debt?This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
Status of this decision: Decision Withdrawn 10 June 2015
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Is the taxpayer, a beneficiary of a trust, entitled to a deduction under section 25-35 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) for unpaid present entitlement amounts that have been written off as bad debts?
Decision
No, the taxpayer is not entitled to a deduction under section 25-35 of the ITAA 1997 as the requirement in paragraph 25-35(1)(a) was not met. The present entitlement to income resulted in an amount calculated pursuant to Division 6 of Part III of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) being included in the taxpayer's assessable income under section 97 of the ITAA 1936. Whilst the entitlements may have become debts at a later time, neither the entitlements themselves nor the debts that they gave rise to were included in assessable income.
Facts
The taxpayer was a beneficiary of a trust.
In each of the 1996-97 to 2001-02 income years (inclusive), the taxpayer was made presently entitled to income of the ABC Trust. None of the present entitlements were paid.
During the 2011-12 income year, the trustee of the ABC Trust was wound up and the trustee advised the beneficiary that there was no likelihood of the entitlements being paid.
During the 2011-12 income year, the beneficiary determined that the unpaid present entitlements were bad debts and they were written off in its books of account as bad.
The taxpayer sought to claim a deduction under section 25-35 of the ITAA 1997 in the 2011-12 income year.
The taxpayer is not in the business of lending money.
Reasons for Decision
A deduction for a bad debt may be claimed under section 25-35 of the ITAA 1997 if the requisite conditions are satisfied.
Paragraph 25-35(1)(a) provides that:
You can deduct a debt or part of a debt that you write off as bad in the income year if:
Taxation Ruling TR 2010/3 states in part:
34. When a beneficiary is presently entitled to an amount from a trust estate, it has an equitable right to that amount. That is, the beneficiary has rights in equity and not, without more, as a result of any debtor-creditor relationship
Whilst the rights arising from a present entitlement can, in some circumstances, become, or crystallise into an equitable debt (for example, upon calling for payment of that entitlement), the right that arises on the creation of a present entitlement is not a debt.[1]
Moreover, the amount included in the taxpayer's assessable income is not the amount of the present entitlement. Rather it includes in its assessable income its proportionate share of the trust's 'net income'[2] calculated by reference to the proportionate share of the income of the trust to which the taxpayer is presently entitled. That is, the amount assessed to the taxpayer may be a very different amount than the amount to which it was entitled to receive from the trust.
As the taxpayer has not brought a debt into account as assessable income and does not carry on a business of lending money, the bad debt cannot be claimed as a deduction under section 25-35 of the ITAA 1997.
See for example Euroasian Holdings Pty Ltd v. Ron Diamond Plumbing Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) [1996] FCA 1262 at [14] and McCarthy J in Commissioner of Inland Revenue v. Ward 69 ATC 6050 at 6071; (1969) 1 ATR 287 at 313.
A trust's 'net income' is determined in accordance with subsection 95(1) of the ITAA 1936.
Year of income: Year ending 30 June 2013
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
section 97
Division 6 of Part III
section 25-35
paragraph 25-35(1)(a)
Case References:
Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Ward
69 ATC 6050
(1969) 1 ATR 287
[1996] FCA 1262
Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
TR 92/18
TR 2003/10
Keywords
Trusts
Trust beneficiaries
Discretionary trusts
Deductions & expenses
Bad debts
ISSN: 1445-2782
| Date: | Version: | |
| 6 February 2013 | Original statement | |
| You are here → | 10 June 2015 | Archived |
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
