Class Ruling

CR 2004/38

Income tax: Off-Market Share Buy-Back: Telstra Corporation Limited

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

• Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
  This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

FOI status:

may be released

What this Class Ruling is about

1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the 'tax law(s)' identified below apply to the defined class of persons, who take part in the arrangement to which this Ruling relates.

Tax law(s)

2. The tax laws dealt with in this Class Ruling are:

•

sections 44, 45A, 45B and 45C of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936);

•

sections 159GZZZM, 159GZZZP and 159GZZZQ of the ITAA 1936;

•

Division 1A of Part IIIA of the ITAA 1936;

•

section 177EA of the ITAA 1936;

•

Division 67 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997);

•

Division 136 of the ITAA 1997; and

•

sections 202-5, 202-40, 202-45, 204-30, 207-20, 207-40, 207-50, 207-145, 207-150 and 995-1 of the ITAA 1997.

Class of persons

3. The class of persons to which this Ruling applies is the shareholders of Telstra Corporation Limited ('Telstra') who disposed of their Telstra shares under the Telstra off-market share buy-back ('the Buy-Back') which was announced by Telstra on 3 October 2003 and described in the arrangement part of this Ruling.

4. This ruling does not apply to shareholders who acquired Telstra shares under either or both of Telstra Employee Share Ownership Plan (TESOP) No. 1 1997 or TESOP No. 2 1999 and disposed of those shares by participating in the Buy-Back. The tax consequences for these shareholders are considered in another Class Ruling (which is issuing shortly after this one). This Class Ruling also does not apply to Telstra and does not deal with how the taxation law applies to Telstra in relation to the Buy-Back. Furthermore, it should be noted that certain information which relates to the affairs of Telstra, but is not in the public domain, has been taken into account in determining the application of certain anti-avoidance provisions in this Ruling. This information cannot be disclosed in the Ruling.

Qualifications

5. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise arrangement identified in this Ruling.

6. The class of persons defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the arrangement actually carried out was carried out in accordance with the arrangement described in paragraphs 11 to 23.

7. If the arrangement actually carried out was materially different from the arrangement that is described in this Ruling, then:

•

this Ruling has no binding effect on the Commissioner because the arrangement entered into is not the arrangement on which the Commissioner has ruled; and

•

this Ruling may be withdrawn or modified.

8. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to:

Commonwealth Copyright Administration

Intellectual Property Branch

Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts

GPO Box 2154

CANBERRA ACT 2601

or by e-mail to: commonwealth.copyright@dcita.gov.au.

Date of effect

9. This Class Ruling applies to the year ended 30 June 2004. However, the Ruling does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Ruling (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20). Furthermore, the Ruling only applies to the extent that:

•

it is not later withdrawn by Gazette;

•

it is not taken to be withdrawn by an inconsistent later public ruling; or

•

the relevant tax laws are not amended.

Withdrawal

10. This Class Ruling is withdrawn and ceases to have effect after 30 June 2004. However, the Ruling continues to apply after its withdrawal in respect of the tax laws ruled upon, to all persons within the specified class who entered into the specified arrangement during the term of the Ruling, subject to there being no change in the arrangement or in the person's involvement in the arrangement.

Arrangement

11. The arrangement that is the subject of this Ruling is described below. This description is based on the following documents. These documents, or relevant parts of them, as the case may be, form part of and are to be read with this description. The relevant documents or parts of documents incorporated into this description of the arrangement are:

•

The application for a Class Ruling dated 1 September 2003;

•

Letter from Mallesons Stephen Jaques dated 19 September 2003;

•

The Buy-Back tender booklet issued by Telstra to shareholders; and

•

Presentation slides from Mallesons Stephen Jaques dated 25 August 2003.

12. On Friday 3 October 2003 Telstra announced an off-market share buy-back ('the Buy-Back'). Under the announced Buy-Back Telstra intended to buy back around $800 to $1000 million worth of shares (although it could choose to buy back a lesser amount or none at all). As at the Record Date for determination of entitlements to the Buy-Back offer, Telstra had approximately 12,866 million ordinary shares on issue (and no other types of shares).

13. In the Tender Buy-Back document the Consolidated Balance Sheet, as at 30 June 2003, disclosed total shareholders' equity of $15.420 billion, consisting of $6.433 billion contributed share capital, ($150) million reserves and $9.137 billion retained profits.

14. The shareholders in Telstra are a mix of individuals, companies, superannuation funds, non-residents and the Commonwealth of Australia. The Commonwealth did not participate in the Buy-Back.

15. The Buy-Back formed part of Telstra's ongoing capital management strategy (Telstra has not undertaken a similar off-market share buy-back prior to this one). It was hoped that this Buy-Back would have positive effects on return on equity and earnings per share over the longer term. Telstra funded the Buy-Back from surplus capital and accumulated retained profits. Telstra did not undertake specific borrowings to finance the purchase price for the Buy-Back.

16. The Buy-Back was a pro rata offer to all Telstra shareholders to buy back up to 100% of their ordinary shares, as registered on the record date for the Buy-Back of Friday 17 October 2003, subject to the Buy-Back Limit, and was implemented through a tender process. Participation by shareholders was voluntary. Shareholders not participating in the Buy-Back were not required to do anything.

17. The tender period opened on Monday 3 November 2003 and closed on Friday 21 November 2003. Under the tender process shareholders were invited to tender up to 100% of their shareholding at specified prices within a specified price range of $4.20 to $5.40 per share. Shareholders could also submit tenders to sell different parcels of shares at different prices. Alternatively, shareholders could submit a Final Tender Price under which they offered to sell their shares for the price as determined by the tender process.

18. At the end of the tender period, Telstra and its advisers would manage a reverse book build of the tenders to determine the Buy-Back price, being the lowest specified price at which Telstra was able to repurchase the amount of capital it chose to buy back. Tenders at prices above the Buy-Back Price would not be accepted.

19. Under the Buy-Back offer successful tenderers would receive $1.50 as a capital amount and the balance of the Buy-Back price as a fully franked divided.

20. The Buy-Back offer included a scale back mechanism. In the event that more shares were tendered at the Buy-Back Price than Telstra wished to repurchase, tenders at the Buy-Back Price were to be scaled back pro rata. If required, the scale back would be determined on 23 November 2003.

21. Shares offered into the Buy-Back by any participating shareholder who, following the scale back under the Buy-Back would be left with an unmarketable parcel (400 shares), would be bought back.

22. The Buy-Back would not affect the established dividend policy of the company, i.e. to return at least 60% of operating profit attributable to shareholders.

23. On 24 November 2003 Telstra announced that:

•

It had successfully completed its off-market Buy-Back tender of approximately 238 million ordinary shares, representing around 1.8% of issued capital, at a price of $4.20 per share;

•

The total amount of capital repurchased by it under the Buy-Back was around $357 million. The balance, being around $643 million, would be paid out as a fully franked dividend;

•

All shareholders who tendered shares into the Buy-Back at $4.20 or as a final price tender, would receive $4.20 per share for all of those shares accepted after the scale back;

•

Shares tendered into the Buy-Back above $4.20 were not successful and would not be bought back;

•

As the Buy-Back was over two and a half times oversubscribed at the $4.20 price, there was a scale back of successful tenders by approximately 65.6%; and

•

The Buy-Back proceeds would be paid to successful tendering shareholders by 12 December 2003.

Ruling

The Dividend Component

24. Participating shareholders will be taken to have been paid a dividend component of $2.70 ('the Dividend Component') for each share bought back out of the profits of Telstra on the date the Buy-Back occurred.

25. The Dividend Component is a frankable distribution pursuant to section 202-40 of the ITAA 1997, and is therefore capable of being franked in accordance with section 202-5 of the ITAA 1997.

26. Participating non-resident shareholders are not liable for withholding tax on the Dividend Component under paragraph 128B(3)(ga) of the ITAA 1936 because the Dividend Component is a frankable distribution pursuant to section 202-40 of the ITAA 1997, and was fully franked by Telstra.

The Capital Component

27. Participating shareholders are taken to have received $1.50 ('the Capital Component') as consideration in respect of the sale of each of their Telstra shares on 23 November 2003 for the purposes of section 159GZZZQ of the ITAA 1936. The treatment of this consideration amount for tax purposes will depend on whether the sale is on capital account (where the shares are held for investment) or on revenue account (where the shares are turned over in the course of business). In general, the relevant treatment should be as follows:

(a)

Shares held on capital account

•

To the extent that each share's reduced cost base exceeds $1.50, the difference will be a capital loss.

(b)

Shares held on revenue account

•

To the extent that the cost of each share exceeds $1.50, the difference will be an allowable deduction.

Qualified Person

28. For the purposes of Division 1A of Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936 participating shareholders will be considered to satisfy the holding period rule under section 160APHO of the ITAA 1936 and therefore be qualified persons (as long as the related payments rule is also met) in relation to the Dividend Component received under the Buy-Back if:

(a)

the shares sold into the Buy-Back were acquired on or before 8 October 2003; and

(b)

during the period when the shares or interest in the shares were held the shareholders did not have 'materially diminished risks of loss or opportunities for gain' in respect of the shares or interest in the shares (as defined in section 160APHM of the ITAA 1936) for a continuous period of at least 45 days.

The Anti-avoidance Provisions

29. The Commissioner will not make a determination under section 45A or 45B of the ITAA 1936 that section 45C of the ITAA 1936 applies to the whole, or any part, of the Capital Component of the Buy-Back price received by participating shareholders.

30. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 to deny the whole, or any part, of the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividend Component under the Buy-Back by participating shareholders.

31. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny to whole, or any part of, the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividend Component under the Buy-Back by participating shareholders.

Explanation

The Dividend and Capital Components

32. The purchase price received by participating shareholders comprises two components:

•

a dividend component; and

•

a capital component.

The amount of each of these components is determined in accordance with sections 159GZZZP and 159GZZZQ of the ITAA 1936, having regard to how the company accounts for the off-market share buy-back.

The Dividend Component

33. Section 159GZZZP provides that where the buy-back of a share is an off-market purchase, the difference between the purchase price and the part (if any) of the purchase price in respect of the buy-back of the share which is debited against amounts standing to the credit of the company's share capital account, is taken to be a dividend paid by the company to the seller on the day the buy-back occurs. In this case the purchase price was $4.20 per share and $1.50 of this was debited to the share capital account. Thus the dividend amount is $2.70 per share.

34. For Australian resident individual and corporate tax entity shareholders, the amount of the dividend will be included in their assessable income under subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936. Generally an amount equal to the amount of the franking credit will be included in their assessable income under subsection 207-20(1) of the ITAA 1997. Australian resident individual and corporate tax entity shareholders are generally also entitled to a tax offset under subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997 reflecting the imputation benefit attached to the dividend.

35. However, it should be noted that provisions exist which may deny a franking credit or tax offset in certain circumstances. For instance, paragraph 207-145(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 requires that the shareholder be a 'qualified person for the purposes of Division IA of Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936' to obtain a franking credit or tax offset. Broadly speaking, to be a qualified person in relation to a dividend a taxpayer must satisfy both the holding period rule (or certain alternative rules) and the related payments rule. These two rules are discussed later in this Class Ruling.

36. As the dividend component of the consideration received under the Buy-Back is fully franked, a non-resident shareholder is not liable to Australian withholding tax on the dividend component in accordance with paragraph 128B(3)(ga).

The Capital Component

37. Participating shareholders are taken to have disposed of those shares accepted under the Buy-Back on 23 November 2003. The disposal may have different taxation implications for shareholders depending on how the shares were held, for instance:

•

an investor who held his or her shares on capital account will be subject to the capital gains tax provisions; and

•

a share trader who held his or her shares on revenue account will be subject to the ordinary income provisions.

It should be noted that shareholders who have both an income tax and a capital gains tax liability will generally have the amount of the capital gain reduced under the anti-overlap provisions contained in section 118-20 of the ITAA 1997. If the shares are held as trading stock the capital gain or loss is disregarded under section 118-25 of the ITAA 1997.

38. For the purposes of computing the amount of the gain or loss (on capital or revenue account) in these cases, the consideration in respect of the disposal of a share under a buy-back is determined in accordance with section 159GZZZQ of the ITAA 1936.

39. The consideration determined under section 159GZZZQ is:

•

The buy-back price; less

•

The reduction amount (within the meaning of subsection 159GZZZQ(4) of the ITAA 1936).

Subsection 159GZZZQ(2) contains a market value rule which applies if the buy-back price in respect of a share bought back under the buy-back is less than the market value of the share at the time of the buy-back if the buy-back did not occur and was never proposed to occur. The effect of this rule is that the difference between the buy-back price and the market value will be treated as consideration for ordinary income or capital gains tax purposes. For the purposes of calculating the profit or loss on disposal of the shares, under either the income or capital gains tax provisions, participating shareholders are taken to have received $1.50 per share as consideration in respect of the sale of their shares under the Buy-Back.

Qualified Person

40. Paragraph 207-145(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 provides that in relation to a franked dividend made by an entity only 'a qualified person in relation to the distribution for the purposes of Division 1A of Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936' is entitled to a franking credit or tax offset. Broadly speaking, to be a 'qualified person' in relation to the Telstra dividend ('the Dividend Component') paid under the Buy-Back, the participating shareholder must satisfy both the holding period rule and the related payments rule.

41. Broadly, a shareholder will not satisfy the related payments rule if the shareholder, or associate of the shareholder, is under an obligation to make, or makes, a payment in respect of the dividend which effectively passes the benefit of the dividend to another person.

42. The holding period rule requires shareholders to hold the shares, or the interest in the shares, on which the dividend is paid at risk for a continuous period of at least 45 days. In determining whether a shareholder has satisfied the holding period rule, any days during which there is a materially diminished risk in relation to the relevant shares are not counted. The day of acquisition and the day of disposal of the relevant shares are also not counted.

43. Under subsection 160APHM(2) of the ITAA 1936, a shareholder is taken to have materially diminished the risks of loss and opportunities for gain with respect to shares or interests in shares if the 'net position' of the shareholder results in the shareholder having less than 30% of the risks and opportunities relating to the shares or interest in shares.

44. In this case the Commissioner does not regard the announcement of the Buy-Back offer as affecting whether the shares or an interest in shares was held at risk or not.

45. There are 45 clear days between 8 October 2003 and 23 November 2003, i.e. the date the tender offer was accepted. Therefore, a shareholder who acquired shares on or before 8 October 2003 satisfies the holding period rule as long as those shares were held at risk for at least 45 continuous days. A shareholder who acquired shares after 8 October 2003 that were subsequently bought back under the Buy-Back is not a qualified person in relation to the dividend paid under the Buy-Back for the purposes of Division 1A of Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936.

46. Generally, under the holding period rule a shareholder will be deemed to have disposed of his or her most recently acquired shares first; subsection 160APHI(4) of the ITAA 1936. The 45 day rule operates on a last-in-first-out basis, so that shareholders will be deemed to have disposed of their most recently acquired shares first for the purposes of applying the 45 day rule. Accordingly, shareholders who acquired any additional Telstra shares in the period 9 October 2003 to 12 October 2003 (being the cut-off date for shares to confer an entitlement to participate in the Buy-Back) may not qualify for the franking credits attached to the dividends paid on some or all of their shares sold into the Buy-Back.

The Anti-Avoidance Provisions

Sections 45A and 45B of the ITAA 1936

47. Sections 45A and 45B of the ITAA 1936 are two anti-avoidance provisions which, if they apply, allow the Commissioner to make a determination under section 45C that all or part of the distribution of capital received by the shareholder under the Buy-Back is treated as an unfranked dividend. Accordingly, the application of these two provisions to the Buy-Back must be considered.

48. Section 45A of the ITAA 1936 is an anti-avoidance provision that applies in circumstances where capital benefits are streamed to certain shareholders (the advantaged shareholders) who derive a greater benefit from the receipt of capital and it is reasonable to assume that the other shareholders (the disadvantaged shareholders) have received or will receive dividends.

49. Although a 'capital benefit' (as defined in paragraph 45A(3)(b) of the ITAA 1936) is provided to participating shareholders under the Buy-Back, the circumstances of the Buy-Back indicate that there is no streaming of capital benefits to some shareholders and dividends to other shareholders. Accordingly, section 45A has no application to the Buy-Back.

50. Section 45B applies where certain capital payments are paid to shareholders in substitution for dividends. Broadly, section 45B of the ITAA 1936 applies where:

(a)

there is a scheme under which a person is provided with a capital benefit by a company (paragraph 45B(2)(a));

(b)

under the scheme, a taxpayer, who may or may not be the person provided with the capital benefit, obtains a tax benefit (paragraph 45B(2)(b)); and

(c)

having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that the person, or one of the persons, who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for a purpose (whether or not the dominant purpose but not including an incidental purpose), of enabling a taxpayer to obtain a tax benefit (paragraph 45B(2)(c)).

51. In the case of the Buy-Back, whilst the conditions of paragraphs 45B(2)(a) and 45B(2)(b) of the ITAA 1936 have been met, the requisite purpose of enabling the shareholder to obtain a tax benefit - by way of capital distribution - was not present.

52. Having regard to the 'relevant circumstances' of the scheme (the Buy-Back), as set out in subsection 45B(8) of the ITAA 1936, it is apparent that the inclusion of a capital element in the Buy-Back price was not inappropriate. Further, the Capital Component of the Buy-Back cannot be said to be attributable to the profits of the company, nor does the pattern of distributions that have been made by Telstra in the past indicate that the Capital Component was being paid in substitution for a dividend.

Section 177EA of the ITAA 1936

53. Section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 is a general anti-avoidance provision that applies to a wide range of schemes to obtain a tax advantage in relation to imputation benefits. In essence, it applies to schemes for the disposition of shares or an interest in shares, where a franked distribution is paid or payable in respect of the shares or an interest in shares. This would include a buy-back with a franked dividend component.

54. Specifically, subsection 177EA(3) provides that section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 applies if:

(a)

there is a scheme for a disposition of membership interests, or an interest in membership interests, in a corporate tax entity; and

(b)

either:

(i)

a frankable distribution has been paid, or is payable or expected to be payable, to a person in respect of the membership interests; or

(ii)

a frankable distribution has flowed indirectly, or flows indirectly or is expected to flow indirectly, to a person in respect of membership interests, as the case may be; and

(c)

the distribution was, or is expected to be, a franked distribution or a distribution franked with an exempting credit; and

(d)

except for this section, a person (the 'relevant taxpayer') would receive, or could reasonably be expected to receive, imputation benefits as a result of the distribution; and

(e)

having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that the person, or one of the persons, who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for a purpose (whether or not the dominant purpose but not including an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit.

55. In the present case the conditions of paragraphs 177EA(3)(a) to (d) are satisfied. Accordingly, the issue is whether, having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that, on the part of Telstra, its shareholders or any other relevant party, there is a purpose more than merely an incidental purpose of conferring an imputation benefit under the scheme. Under this arrangement the relevant taxpayer is the participating shareholder and the scheme comprises the circumstances surrounding the Buy-Back.

56. In arriving at a conclusion the Commissioner must have regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme which include, but are not limited to, the circumstances set out in subsection 177EA(17). The relevant circumstances listed there encompass a range of circumstances which taken individually or collectively could indicate the requisite purpose. Due to the diverse nature of these circumstances some may not be present at any one time in any one scheme.

57. The Commissioner has come to the view that section 177EA applies to the Buy-Back. In coming to this conclusion the Commissioner had regard to all the relevant circumstances of the arrangement, as outlined in subsection 177EA(17). Among the circumstances of the Buy-Back reflected in those paragraphs are: the delivery of franking credits in excess of what would have otherwise been distributed in the ordinary course of dividend declaration; the greater attraction of the Buy-Back to resident shareholders who could fully utilise the franking credits than to non-resident shareholders who could not; and that participating shareholders were more likely than not to make an economic gain, but a loss for tax purposes, from their participation.

58. Where section 177EA applies the Commissioner has a discretion, pursuant to subsection 177EA(5) to make a determination to debit the company's franking account pursuant to paragraph 177EA(5)(a), or deny the imputation benefit to each shareholder pursuant to paragraph 177EA(5)(b). The Commissioner will exercise his discretion in such a way that he does not make a determination that the imputation benefit obtained by the participating shareholders be denied under paragraph 177EA(5)(b). It would be inappropriate, given the large and diverse shareholding of the company, to make a determination to deny franking imputation benefits in relation to each participating shareholder.

Section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997

59. Section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997 applies where a corporate tax entity streams the payment of dividends, or the payment of dividends and the giving of other benefits, to its members in such a way that:

(a)

an imputation benefit is, or apart from this section would be, received by a member of the entity as a result of the distribution or distributions (paragraph 204-30(1)(a));

(b)

the member would derive a greater benefit from franking credits than another member of the entity (paragraph 204-30(1)(b)); and

(c)

the other member of the entity will receive lesser imputation benefits, or will not receive any imputation benefits, whether or not the other member receives other benefits (paragraph 204-30(1)(c)).

60. If section 204-30 applies the Commissioner is vested with a discretion under subsection 204-30(3) to make a determination in writing either:

(a)

that a specified franking debit arises in the franking account of the entity, for a specified distribution or other benefit to a disadvantaged member (paragraph 204-30(3)(a)); or

(b)

that no imputation benefit is to arise in respect of any streamed distributions made to a favoured member and specified in the determination (paragraph 204-30(3)(c)).

61. For section 204-30 to apply, members to whom distributions are streamed must derive a greater benefit from imputation benefits than the members who do not participate in the buy-back. The words 'derives a greater benefit from franking credits' (imputation benefits) are defined in subsection 204-30(8) by reference to the ability of the members to fully utilise imputation benefits.

62. A significant portion of Telstra's ordinary shareholding was held by the Commonwealth and non-residents, shareholders who do not benefit from franking to the same extent as other resident shareholders. Thus, the conditions in subsection 204-30(1) for the provisions to apply are met. However, the Commissioner will not exercise his discretion under subsection 204-30(c) to deny imputation benefits that arise in respect of the Dividend Component of the Buy-Back paid to participating shareholders.

Refundable Tax Offsets

63. The excess (if any) of the tax offset attributable to the franking credit on the dividend component will be subject to the refundable tax offset rules of Division 67 of the ITAA 1997.

Non-Resident Shareholders

64. Under section 136-10 of the ITAA 1997, non-residents are liable to capital gains tax if a CGT (capital gains tax) event happens and the relevant asset in respect of that event has the necessary connection with Australia under the ITAA 1997.

65. The meaning of assets that have the 'necessary connection with Australia' is set out in section 136-25 of the ITAA 1997.

66. Under section 136-25, an asset will have the necessary connection with Australia if it is a share or an interest in a share, in a company that is an Australian resident, and a public company, for the income year in which the CGT event happens where at any time during so much of the period of 5 years immediately preceding the time at which the CGT event occurs the taxpayer and/or associates of the taxpayer were the beneficial owners of not less than 10% by value of the shares of the company.

67. The 10% ownership excludes any part of that share capital that carried no right to participate beyond a specified amount in a distribution of either profits or capital.

68. As Telstra is an Australian resident and public company, a non-resident shareholder who participated in the Buy-Back is liable to capital gains tax if the non-resident shareholder and/ or associates of the non-resident shareholder were the beneficial owners of not less than 10% by value of the shares of Telstra (unless the 10% ownership was of share capital that carried no right to participate beyond a specified amount in a distribution of either profits or capital), at any time during so much of the period of 5 years immediately preceding the time at which the Buy-Back happened.

Detailed contents list

69. Below is a detailed contents list for this Class Ruling:

Commissioner of Taxation
21 April 2004

Not previously issued as a draft.

References

ATO references:
NO 2004/4573

Related Rulings/Determinations:

CR 2001/1
TR 92/1
TR 97/16

Subject References:
dividend streaming arrangements
share buy backs

Legislative References:
ITAA 1936 44(1)
ITAA 1936 45A
ITAA 1936 45A(3)(b)
ITAA 1936 45B
ITAA 1936 45B(2)(a)
ITAA 1936 45B(2)(b)
ITAA 1936 45B(2)(c)
ITAA 1936 45B(8)
ITAA 1936 45C
ITAA 1936 90
ITAA 1936 95(1)
ITAA 1936 159GZZZM
ITAA 1936 159GZZZP
ITAA 1936 159GZZZQ
ITAA 1936 159GZZZQ(4)
ITAA 1936 160APHM
ITAA 1936 160APHM(2)
ITAA 1936 160APHO
ITAA 1936 177EA
ITAA 1936 177EA(3)
ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(a)
ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(b)
ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(c)
ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(d)
ITAA 1936 177EA(5)(a)
ITAA 1936 177EA(17)
ITAA 1997 Div 67
ITAA 1997 Div 136
ITAA 1997 118-20
ITAA 1997 136-10
ITAA 1997 202-5
ITAA 1997 202-40
ITAA 1997 202-45
ITAA 1997 204-30
ITAA 1997 204-30(1)(a)
ITAA 1997 204-30(1)(b)
ITAA 1997 204-30(1)(c)
ITAA 1997 204-30(3)(a)
ITAA 1997 204-30(3)(c)
ITAA 1997 204-30(8)
ITAA 1997 207-20
ITAA 1997 207-40
ITAA 1997 207-40(1)
ITAA 1997 207-40(2)
ITAA 1997 207-50
ITAA 1997 207-145
ITAA 1997 207-145(1)(a)
ITAA 1997 207-150
ITAA 1997 995-1
TAA 1953 Pt IVAAA
Copyright Act 1968