Draft Taxation Determination

TD 94/D85

Income tax: can subsection 51(2A) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (the Act) operate to defer a tax deduction, available to a retail motor vehicle dealer, for second schedule charges incurred when acquiring new vehicle trading stock?

• Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this draft ruling.
  This document has been finalised by TD 94/94.

FOI status:

draft only - for comment

Preamble

1. Yes. Subsection 51(2A) of the Act has the effect of deferring a deduction for expenditure incurred after 19 December 1991 in connection with the acquisition of stock until:

(a)

that stock has actually become trading stock on hand of the taxpayer; or

(b)

an amount has been included in assessable income as a result of the disposal of that stock by the taxpayer.

2. Second schedule charges incurred by a motor vehicle dealer, upon the acquisition of a new vehicle from the manufacturer/importer, are considered to be a component of cost price for the purposes of calculating the value of the item in terms of subsection 31(1) of the Act (see Draft Taxation Determination TD 94/D86).

3. Numerous motor vehicle dealerships involved in the distribution of new vehicles are structured on composite business lines, usually with separate wholesale and retail company. This structure was illustrated in the case of FC of T v. Suttons Motors (Chullora) Wholesale Pty Ltd 85 ATC 4398; (1985) 16 ATR 567.

4. Some dealers, when the purchase of a new vehicle is completed, have an arrangement with the manufacturer/importer for the invoicing of the first schedule charges to the wholesale company. Around the same time an invoice for the second schedule charges is forwarded to the retail company. In the event of a retail sale of a new motor vehicle the vehicle is disposed of by the wholesale company to the retail company and then by the retail company to the purchaser.

5. In these circumstances subsection 51(2A) may apply to defer a deduction to a dealer's retail company for second schedule charges incurred subsequent to 19 December 1991. A deduction is only allowable once the conditions explicit in subsection 51(2A) have been satisfied.

Example

The Larger-Than-Life Motors Group consists of a wholesale company and a retail company. The group markets the Sunburn range of new motor vehicles.

Subsequent to 19 December 1991, the group places an order for a new Sunburn vehicle. The vehicle is delivered and the wholesale company receives an invoice for the first schedule charges. Around the same time, the retail company receives an invoice for the second schedule charges, the additional charges levied by the manufacturer for the delivered vehicle.

This new Sunburn vehicle is still on hand at the end of the financial year and is accounted for as trading stock on hand.

The wholesale company should bring the vehicle to account at the end of the year as trading stock on hand. The first schedule charges would represent a component of cost price for the purposes of calculating the value of the vehicle in terms of subsection 31(1).

Due to the operation of subsection 51(2A), the retail company would be denied a deduction for the second schedule charges in that year.

Commissioner of Taxation
11 August 1994

References

ATO references:
NO BAN TD 41

Related Rulings/Determinations:

TR 94/D86
TR 93/9

Subject References:
trading stock valuation method
cost price of motor vehicles
cost price method

Legislative References:
ITAA 31(1)
ITAA 51(2A)

Case References:
FC of T v. Suttons Motors (Chullora) Wholesale Pty Ltd
85 ATC 4398
(1985) 16 ATR 567