Draft Taxation Determination
TD 95/D6
Income tax: capital gains: does the expression 'an improvement of a capital nature' in subsection 160P(6) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 contemplate aggregating separate improvements to determine whether the threshold and ratio tests of the subsection are met?
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this draft ruling.This document has been finalised by TD 95/58.
FOI status:
draft only - for commentPreamble
Draft Taxation Determinations (TDs) present the preliminary, though considered, views of the ATO. Draft TDs may not be relied on; only final TDs are authoritative statements of the ATO. |
1. Yes, where there is a single improvement. We consider that there is one single improvement that is deemed to be one separate asset for the purposes of subsection 160P(6) in each of the following situations:
- (a)
- where there are separate related improvements (whether or not they are made under one overall project or plan of improvement) undertaken within a reasonable period, even if they are done in stages rather than in a single operation; or where
- (b)
- a number of improvements are made within a reasonable period under one overall project or plan of improvement (especially if they are undertaken in a single operation - but even if they are done in stages);
provided that, on their completion, the improvements in both situations (a) and (b) are either:
- (c)
- of the same broad class or kind; or
- (d)
- combined, integrated, associated, linked or dependent (physically or functionally); and
the improvements are not discrete or self-contained (physically or functionally) from each other.
2. Aggregation is not appropriate if:
- (a)
- a number of improvements are made to an underlying asset, but not under one overall project or plan of improvement; and
- (b)
- each improvement is separate and distinct from, and unrelated to, any other improvement in the sense that it is a discrete or self-contained improvement physically or functionally independent from any other improvement;
(see Case 38/94 94 ATC 343; AAT Case 9671 28 ATR 1299).
3. To a large extent, it is a matter of impression and degree whether improvements should be aggregated for the purposes of subsection 160P(6). Relevant factors might be expected to include:
- •
- the nature of the underlying asset involved;
- •
- the period of time over which the works of improvement are done;
- •
- whether the work is carried out in accordance with one overall project or plan; and
- •
- the nature, location, size, value, quality, composition and utility of each improvement and the extent to which it relates (physically or functionally) to each other improvement.
4. This Taxation Determination replaces Taxation Determination TD 6, which (when this draft Taxation Determination becomes final) will be withdrawn.
Commissioner of Taxation
22 June 1995
References
ATO references:
NO NAT 95/4278-7
BO CGT Cell CGDET 108
Related Rulings/Determinations:
TD 9
TD 94/56
Subject References:
improvement
separate asset
Legislative References:
ITAA 160P(6)
ITAA 160P(6)(c)(ii)
ITAA 160P(6)(d)
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).