Disclaimer This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011471410808
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: Capital gains tax - cost base - fifth element.
Question 1:
Will the payment of compensation made to your children form part of the cost base?
Answer:
Yes.
Question 2:
Will the payment of legal and other costs incurred as part of legal proceedings form part of the cost base?
Answer:
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2010, and
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2009
Relevant facts and circumstances
You and your spouse divorced overseas some years ago
Some property assets were divided and set up as a Trust Deed at this time to provide for the maintenance and education of your three children (beneficiaries).
At this time the children were minors.
You and your spouse were joint trustees.
Under the trust deed, the net sale proceeds of certain specified real estate was to be divided multiple ways, between you and your spouse and the children.
You and your spouse took your share and the children's share was to be held on trust for them until they attained the age of twenty five, pending which income was to be applied for their benefit until that time, and then added to capital.
Following the breakdown of the marriage you moved to Australia with your children where you supported them as a sole parent.
Two main clauses, among others in the Trust Deed stated that the Trustees shall hold the shares of the children in trust for them until each child attains the age of twenty five. The Trustees shall during the trust period of the minor beneficiaries pay or apply the income of the trust fund to or for the maintenance, education or support or otherwise for the benefit of all or any of the minor beneficiaries in such shares and manners as the Trustees think fit.
Under section 38 (1) of the Trustee Act 1958 a trustee is empowered to apply up to half the trust capital for the maintenance, education and advancement or benefit of the beneficiaries, subject to any contrary intention expressed in the trust instrument.
The trust funds arrived in several stages over five years, as the properties were sold.
As trustee you owed a number of duties which included strictly adhering to the terms of the trust deed.
The terms of the trust deed were not met by you as trustee.
No trust distribution was made to the children when each turned twenty five as the trust had effectively been exhausted a number of years later.
Your former spouse passed away and your children became aware of the Trust Deed which was put in place as they were now over the age of 25.
Your children served you with court ordered affidavits which made allegations of breach of trust and made claims on the current properties that you owned.
Your children (plaintiffs) contended that as beneficiaries of the trust they were entitled to an equitable proprietary interest in the properties that you owned:
You represented yourself in The Supreme Court to defend your ownership rights to these properties.
The judgment issued by the Supreme Court ordered you to make payments by way of equitable compensation to the plaintiffs.
Legal and other costs were incurred to obtain legal advice and assistance.
The above is a summary of the scheme that has been extracted from the following documents, which are to be read with and form part of the scheme for the purpose of this ruling:
· Private ruling application form
· Transcript of proceedings, Supreme Court
· Trust Deed
· Affidavits
· Originating Motion
· Amended Originating Motion
Reasons for decision
The cost base of a CGT asset is generally the cost of the asset when you bought it. However, it also includes certain other costs associated with acquiring, holding and disposing of the asset. There are 5 elements in the cost base:
· First element: money or property given for the asset
· Second element: incidental cost of acquiring the CGT asset or that relate to the
CGT event
· Third element: costs of owning the asset
· Fourth element: capital costs to increase or preserve the value of your asset
or to install or move it
· Fifth element: Capital costs of preserving or defending your ownership of or rights to your asset.
The fifth element of the cost base relates to capital costs of preserving or defending your ownership of or rights to your asset. In your case your children initiated legal action and attempted to claim interests in your properties that were registered in your name. You defended yourself against the claims made by your children. The legal fees that you incurred in defending the claims made by your children are included in the fifth element of the cost base of the properties because if you had not taken the action the court may have allowed the claims and your interest in the properties may have been transferred to your children.
However, the payment of compensation that you were required to pay to your children is not included in the fifth element of the cost base of the properties. Once the court had largely dismissed your children's claims your properties were no longer threatened. The compensation payments were awarded due to the wrong you committed in your role as trustee and have not been made to defend or preserve your interests in the properties.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).