Disclaimer
This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au

This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011485252227

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Personal superannuation contributions - validity of 'Notice to vary'

Question

Is a notice to vary the amount of a contribution provided to the trustee of a superannuation fund (a successor superannuation fund) under section 290-180 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) in respect of contributions made by a person to a predecessor superannuation fund a valid notice?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

1 July 2007 to 30 June 2010

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2007

Relevant facts

On the relevant date in 200X a member sent to their superannuation fund (the predecessor fund) a notice of intent to claim a deduction for personal superannuation contributions in accordance with section 290-170 of the ITAA 1997.

This notice of intent to claim a deduction for the year ended 30 June 200X was received by the predecessor fund in 200X and was duly acknowledged.

Later a successor fund merged with the predecessor fund by way of a successor fund transfer and the members of the predecessor fund (including the above mentioned member) were transferred to the successor fund along with their accumulated benefits.

Later in 200Y the member sought advice from the Tax Office about lodging a notice to vary the contributions she had made to the predecessor fund.

After that call the member submitted to the successor fund a notice seeking to vary the contributions she had made to the predecessor fund in accordance with section 290-180 of the ITAA 1997.

This variation notice was received by the successor fund in late 200Y however the successor fund treated the notice as 'invalid' and did not process or act upon the notice because it related to contributions made to the predecessor fund.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 290-180

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 290-170

Reasons for decision

Summary

The notice to vary is not valid for 2 reasons:

Detailed reasoning

A person can claim a deduction for personal contributions made to a superannuation fund for the purpose of providing superannuation benefits for themselves under section 290-150 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). Subdivision 290-C of the ITAA 1997 lists four conditions that must be satisfied for the person to claim an income tax deduction for the contributions.

One of these conditions is the member must have given a valid notice of intent to the superannuation fund or retirement savings account (RSA) provider in the approved form by the required time and have received an acknowledgement from the fund trustee or the RSA provider (section 290-170 of the ITAA 1997). In this case the 'notice of intent to claim a deduction' was lodged correctly and was duly acknowledged so that condition of Subdivision 290-C of the ITAA 1997 was satisfied.

In accordance with section 290-180 of the ITAA 1997 a person can vary a 'notice of intent to claim a deduction' by giving a 'notice to vary' to the trustee in the approved form. However, section 290-180 lists a number of restrictions to lodging a 'notice to vary' as follows:

In short, these three subsections place restrictions around:

For the circumstances of this case, a closer examination of subsection 290-180(2) is required and in particular to the words 'to the trustee'.

A person who is making or has made a contribution to a fund may give a written 'notice of intent' to the trustee of the fund stating the person intends to claim a deduction for the whole or a specified part of the contribution (section 290-170).

The amount covered by the 'notice of intent' may be reduced. A person does this by giving written 'notice to vary' to the trustee of a fund reducing the amount covered by the original 'notice of intent' (section 290-180).

The giving of a 'notice to vary' reduces the amount covered by the original 'notice of intent' and the net amount continues to be covered by the original 'notice of intent'.

Section 290-170 of the ITAA 1997 requires that a 'notice of intent' be given to the trustee of the fund to which the contribution was made.

As the 'notice to vary' given under section 290-180 of the ITAA 1997 applies to the amount covered in the original 'notice of intent' given under section 290-170 of the ITAA 1997, it is also subject to the same requirement. i.e. it must be given to the trustee of the fund to which the 'notice of intent' was lodged and where the contributions were made.

This is because the 'notice to vary' only has relevance to a trustee who received the original 'notice of intent' under section 290-170 of the ITAA 1997. The successor fund is not the fund which received the contributions or the original 'notice of intent' therefore, in accordance with subsection 290-180(2), the notice lodged by the member is not valid as it has not be given to the correct trustee.

In addition, a person ceases to be a member of a predecessor fund once they have been transferred to a successor fund. Of relevance to the circumstances of this case is subsection 290-180(3A) of the ITAA 1997 which states:

The variation is not effective if, when you make it:

Although the wording of the subsection is clear that to lodge a valid 'notice to vary' the person needs to be a member, the Explanatory Memorandum for Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Simplification) Act 2007 (15 of 2007) which accompanied the introduction of subsection 290-180(3A) adds:

The legislation and Explanatory Memorandum both make it clear that a valid 'notice to vary' can only be lodged by a member of the fund. As this member is a member of the successor fund and not the predecessor fund she cannot lodge a valid 'notice to vary' with the successor fund.

The member advised they contacted the Tax Office in the relevant month in 200Y seeking advice about lodging a notice to vary the contributions they had made to the predecessor fund. The ATO records for the call are of no assistance in this matter.

In conclusion, the 'notice to vary' is not valid for 2 reasons:


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).