Disclaimer
This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au

This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011491603787

Ruling

Subject: Fringe Benefits Tax - in-house residual fringe benefit

Issue

Question 1

Is the provision of internally funded scholarships by an educational institution to specified employees who undertake a specified course it provides a residual fringe benefit under subsection 136(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

If the answer to question 1 is yes, is the provision of the scholarship an in-house residual fringe benefit as defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA?

Answer

No

Question 3

If the answers to questions 1 and 2 are yes, will the benefit be an in-house period residual fringe benefit and valued in accordance with section 49 of the FBTAA?

Answer

Not applicable

Relevant facts

The educational institution was established under an Act.

The educational facilities offered by the educational institution are of tertiary education.

The applicant stated that the educational institution is carrying on a business.

The applicant provided the following information against each of the criteria in paragraph 13 of Taxation Ruling TR97/11 Income tax: am I carrying on a business of primary production. Whilst this ruling is aimed at primary production, the general characteristics of a business are as the same. The indicators are as follows:

Whether the activity has a significant commercial purpose or character

Whether the educational institution has more than just an intention to engage in business

Whether the educational institution has a purpose of profit as well as a prospect of profit from the activity

Whether there is repetition and regularity of the activity

Whether the activity is of the same kind and carried on in a similar manner to that of the ordinary trade in that line of business

Whether the activity is planned, organised and carried on in businesslike manner such that it is directed at making a profit

The size, scale and permanency of the activity

Whether the activity is better described as a hobby, a form of recreation or a sporting activity

In applying these indicators to the circumstances of the educational institution, it is clear that the facts support that the educational institution is carrying on a business.

Currently the educational institution offers a course which consists of 18 units or 6 months full time equivalent study. The course is offered by the educational institution to the public and to the educational institution employees with the admission criteria being that applicants to the course must normally hold an approved bachelor degree or equivalent qualification from an approved tertiary institution.

Each year the educational institution offers a number of internally funded scholarships to eligible educational institution employees only. The employees who are eligible are selected by academic merit on endorsement by their faculty executive dean and must meet the general admission criteria as above as well as being an employee of the educational institution.

These eligible employees do not have to pay for the course. There are no additional charges. educational institution employees who are not awarded a scholarship have to pay the Student Contribution Amount (SCA). No benefit is provided to the other employees.

The SCA for local students is calculated for each topic which is classified in a student contribution band. The educational institution charges the student contribution allowed by the Australian Government for each band.

The course units are delivered to the educational institution specified employees and educational institution students in an identical manner and at the same time. Assessments and awards are also provided at the same time.

For the current year enrolment, the total number of students for the course is X (number). Y (number) are educational institution employee students. Z (number) out of the x staff students are provided with the scholarship by the educational institution. V (number) are Australian non-educational institution employee students.

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 45

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 49

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 136(1)

Reasons for decision

Issue

Question 1

Is the provision of internally funded scholarships by the educational institution to specified employees who undertake a specified course it provides a residual fringe benefit under subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA?

Summary

As the provision of education and training does not fall within any of the specific categories of benefits within Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 (inclusive) of the FBTAA, it is a residual benefit.

Detailed reasoning

The educational institution offers a number of internally funded scholarships to eligible educational institution employees for the course.

These eligible employees do not have to make any student contribution for the course. There are no additional charges. That is, these eligible employees receive a fee free course. This is a benefit provided to these employees.

Is this benefit a fringe benefit as defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA?

The definition of fringe benefit in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA states:

A fringe benefit is a benefit provided to an employee or an associate of the employee, by the employer or an associate of the employer, in respect of the employment of the employee.

As the benefit of the provision of the fee free course is provided to eligible employees of the educational institution, by the educational institution, because they are employed by the educational institution, the benefit is a fringe benefit in accordance with subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA.

Is the fringe benefit a residual fringe benefit?

Subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA states

Section 45 of the FBTAA defines a residual benefit as:

As the provision of education and training does not fall within any of the specific categories of benefits within Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 (inclusive) of the FBRAA, it is a residual benefit.

Question 2

If the answer to question 1 is yes, is the provision of the scholarship an in-house residual fringe benefit as defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA?

Summary

The provision of the scholarship for the course to specific employees is not an in-house residual benefit as defined because the requirement in subparagraph (a)(ii) of the definition of in-house residual fringe benefit in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA is not met.

Detailed reasoning

An in-house residual fringe benefit is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean:

Based on the answer to question 1 of this ruling the benefit provided is a residual fringe benefit.

Is the provider of the benefit the employer or an associate of the employer?

Provider is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean 'the person who provides the benefit'. Therefore, for Flinders educational institution to be the provider, it must be a person.

Person is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to include:

The educational institution was established under section 3 of the Act which states that the educational institution is a body corporate.

As the educational institution is a body corporate it comes within the definition of person in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA.

Therefore, the provider of the benefit is the employer (the educational institution).

Does the educational institution carry on the required business at the comparison time?

The comparison time is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA. The relevant part of the definition is sub subparagraph (a)(ii)(A), at the time the overall benefit commenced. The benefit is a period residual fringe benefit because it is provided during a period, the duration of the course. Therefore, the comparison time is when the GCE(HE) course commenced.

Is the educational institution carrying on a business?

The FBTAA does not define what constitutes carrying on a business for the purpose of the application of the in-house provisions. It does however define "business operations" in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA as:

In relation to a government body or a non-profit company, includes any operations or activities carried out by that body or company.

In discussing the meaning of the term business operations paragraph 9 of Taxation Ruling TR 2000/4 Fringe benefits tax: meaning of business premises states:

The term business is also defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) as:

The Macquarie media dictionary describes to be in business as:

These definitions indicate the requirement to be carrying on a business for the purpose of the FBTAA is capable of having a wide meaning.

Support for these definitions was provided by the High Court decision in NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power and Water Authority [2004] HCA 48; 219 CLR 90; 210 ALR 312; 79 ALJR 1 where the phrase carrying on a business was construed broadly.

In the earlier decision of NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power & Water Authority [2001] FCA 334 Mansfield J stated at paragraph 236:

Paragraph 13 of Taxation ruling TR 97/11 Income tax: am I carrying on a business of primary production also provides a number of indicators which are relevant to determining whether a person is carrying on a business in general for income tax purposes. The indicators are as follows:

In considering these indicators to the educational institution, it is accepted that the following points are indicative of a business being carried on.

Based on these facts, it is accepted that the educational institution is carrying on a business.

Does the provision of the course constitute the provision of similar benefits provided principally to outsiders?

Its main business activity is the provision of tertiary education including the course to members of the public, as well as research. The course undertaken by the specified employees of educational institution is the same as provided to other Australian or overseas students who are not employees of the educational institution.

The course units are delivered to the educational institution specified employees and educational institution students in an identical manner and at the same time. Assessments and awards are also provided at the same time.

It is accepted that the course undertaken at the educational institution by its specified employees are identical or similar to those offered to other Australian students.

Outsider is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean:

a person not being:

In applying this definition, employees of the educational institution will not be outsiders but most other students except some students whom are associates of the employees or an employee of an associate of the employer are outsiders.

Principally is not defined in the FBTAA. The Macquarie dictionary defines it as chiefly; mainly. To satisfy this requirement it is necessary that the educational institution provides this course mainly to outsiders.

Per this definition, the majority of students in this course have to be outsiders. For the current enrolment, there are X (number) students and Y (number) of them are the educational institution employee students. Out of which Z (number) of them are provided this benefit. Only 2 are non-educational institution employee students.

In this situation, we cannot accept that the provision of this benefit is principally to outsiders. This requirement is not met.

Accordingly, we conclude that the provision of internally funded scholarships by the educational institution to specified employees who undertake this course is not an in-house residual benefit as defined in section 136(1) of the FBTAA.

Any residual fringe benefit that is not an in-house residual fringe benefit is an external residual fringe benefit.

Question 3

If the answers to questions 1 and 2 are yes, will the benefit be an in-house period residual fringe benefit and valued in accordance with section 49 of the FBTAA?

Summary

As the answer to question 2 is no, question 3 is not applicable.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).