Disclaimer This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011532125842
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: car expenses
Are you entitled to claim a deduction for work related motor vehicle expenses where the vehicle is subject to a novated lease?
No.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2009
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2008
Relevant facts
You entered into a novated car lease agreement with a finance company and your employer for a car with under one tonne carrying capacity.
Under the agreement, your employer agreed to assume responsibility for the obligations arising under the lease, including the monthly rental instalments.
Payslips received during the income year show that you were paying the rental instalments from your net income.
You were also paying for fuel, repairs and maintenance, tyres and half of the insurance on the car.
Your employer did not treat the lease agreement as a fringe benefit for income tax purposes.
During the income year, your employer set up a separate payroll company, and, as a result, you were issued two payment summaries.
Your employer did allocate a part of your gross income as a car allowance, which has been included on your payment summaries for the income year as an allowance. This allowance has not been taxed.
The motor vehicle was used for work related travel as well as private purposes.
In a separate agreement with your employer, the employer's logo was placed on the car and in return the employer agreed to pay your vehicle's registration and part of the insurance.
Reasons for decision
Taxation Ruling TR1999/15 considers the taxation consequences of certain motor vehicle lease novation arrangements.
Novation arrangements occur where the employee takes out a finance lease for a car. The finance lease is then novated in full to the employer. As a result, the employer becomes the lessee and all the rights and obligations of the lease are transferred to the employer. The finance lease is rescinded (contractually extinguished) and replaced by the new novated lease arrangement. The employer becomes the lessee under the novated lease and is entitled to a deduction for lease expenses where the vehicle is used in the business or provided to an employee as part of a salary packaging arrangement.
Where the employee's use of the vehicle includes private as well as work-related travel a fringe benefit is provided to the employee and this will generally incur a fringe benefits tax for the employer.
Generally, under a novated lease agreement, an employee is deemed not to have incurred any expense in relation to the car. This is because under the terms of the agreement all of the expenses relating to the vehicle are novated to the employer. As such, the employee is provided with a car by the employer and it is the employer who is incurring the expenses and fringe benefits tax liability during the period of the novated lease.
In instances where an employee is actually incurring expenses in relation to a vehicle provided by an employer, for whatever reason, section 51AF of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) specifically denies employees from claiming deductions in respect of the car expenses. The employee is prevented from claiming a deduction for expenses they have incurred because they are used to reduce the employer's fringe benefits tax liability. The expenses are factored into the formulas used to calculate fringe benefits tax assessed to the employer and if the employee was also entitled to claim a deduction for the expenses then there would be double dipping.
In your case, you entered into a novated lease agreement with your employer, however, in practice, the employer did not assume the rights and obligations arising under the lease. The lease payments, as well as the fuel, repairs and maintenance, tyres and some insurance expenses, were paid by you from your net income. However, you are not able to claim a deduction for these car expenses as a deduction is specifically denied under section 51AF of the ITAA 1936.
Even though your employer transferred its payroll functions to a separate company during the income year, resulting in two payment summaries being issued, your employment with the employer did not cease, therefore, the novated lease agreement was in place for the entire income year.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).