Disclaimer This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011537222528
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: Capital gains tax (CGT) - home loan unit trust
Is the Trustee entitled to disregard any capital gain or loss on the sale of the property?
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2011
Year ended 30 June 2012
Year ended 30 June 2013
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2010
Relevant facts and circumstances
This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.
The Unit Trust acquired a property after 1985.
The Unit Trust is owned and controlled by X and Y.
X and Y are the only directors and shareholders of the trustee company.
Finance to purchase the property was advanced to the Trust by X and Y.
The Trust rented the property to X and Y for residential purposes as from the date it was acquired and at the same time X and Y sought to claim tax deductions for interest and bank fees and charges on monies borrowed to loan to the trust for purchase of the property.
X and Y were subject to an audit by the Australian Tax Office (ATO). As a result of the audit, the interest and bank charges were disallowed as they were not allowable deductions under sections 8-1 or 25-25 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997).
Amended notices of assessment were issued for X and Y.
X and Y lodged objections to the audit.
The objections were disallowed in full.
X and Y were offered a Settlement arrangement regarding the Unit Trust arrangement by the ATO.
This Settlement arrangement offer was not taken up by X or Y.
X and Y wish to treat the property as their main residence until the sale of the property by the trust or until an event which would determine the ceasing of the property to be their principal place of residence.
As the dwelling is owned by a trust it is not eligible for exemption from CGT for the period it constitutes the principle place of residence.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 25-25
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 102-20
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-110
Does Part IVA apply to this ruling?
Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) is a general anti-avoidance rule that can apply in certain circumstances if you or another taxpayer obtains a tax benefit in connection with an arrangement and it can be concluded that the arrangement, or any part of it, was entered into or carried out by any person for the dominant purpose of enabling a tax benefit to be obtained. If Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 applies the tax benefit can be cancelled, for example, by disallowing a deduction that was otherwise allowable.
We have not fully considered the application of Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 to the arrangement you asked us to rule on, or to an associated or wider arrangement of which that arrangement is part.
If you want us to rule on whether Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 applies we will first need to obtain and consider all the facts about the arrangement which are relevant to determining whether Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 may apply.
For more information on Part IVA of the ITAA 1936, go to our website www.ato.gov.au and enter 'part iva general' in the search box on the top right of the page, then select: Part IVA: the general anti-avoidance rule for income tax.
Reasons for decision
CGT and main residence exemption
Under section 118-110 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), if a taxpayer is an individual, they can generally disregard a capital gain or a capital loss from a CGT event that happens to a dwelling that they own and live in for the entire period that they own it. On the other hand, a capital gain or a capital loss on the sale of a residence owned by a trust can not be disregarded under the main residence concessions even though it is the main residence of a controlling taxpayer.
Application to this case
The Trust rented the property to X and Y for residential purposes as from the date it was acquired and at the same time X and Y sought to claim tax deductions for interest and bank fees and charges on monies borrowed to loan to the trust for purchase of the property.
X and Y were subject to an audit by the ATO. As a result of the audit, the interest and bank charges were disallowed as they were not allowable deductions under section 8-1 and section 25-25 of the ITAA 1997.
X and Y lodged objections to the audit and the objections were disallowed in full.
X and Y were offered a Settlement arrangement regarding the Unit Trust arrangement by the ATO.
This Settlement arrangement offer was not taken up by X or Y.
It is understood that if X and Y as individuals owned the property and it was used solely as a main residence by X and Y, then it would qualify for the main residence CGT exemption (assuming all other conditions for exemption were met). However, as the property is owned by a unit trust it does not qualify for the main residence exemption.
Conclusion
As the property owned by the Trustee for the Unit Trust it does not qualify for main residence exemption under section 118-110 of the ITAA 1997.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).