Disclaimer This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011542546753
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fac sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: Fringe benefits tax; remote area housing concessions
Question 1
Is the employer entitled to reduce the taxable value of expense payment fringe benefits provided to its employees that arise from the payment of interest on remote area housing loans by 50% under subsection 60(2) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986? (FBTAA).
Answer
Yes
Question 2
Is the employer entitled to reduce the taxable value of expense payment fringe benefits provided to its employees that arise from the payment of remote area housing rent by 50% of the employees' gross rent under subsection 60(2A) of theFBTAA?
Answer
Yes
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ending 30 June 2011
Year ending 30 June 2012
Year ending 30 June 2013
Relevant facts and circumstances
You propose to offer salary packages to current and future employees who have their usual place of residence in a remote area and provide them with remote area housing assistance in the form of:
· a payment of interest expense on a remote area housing loan, and
· rental payments connected with a unit of accommodation.
The purpose of having the arrangement included in the salary sacrifice arrangement or as part of the after tax allowance is to ensure that the arrangement is cost neutral to you, while providing a benefit/incentive to your employees.
Your district is in a remote location.
The employees' place of residence in each case is or will be in an area which is classed as not being near or adjacent to an eligible urban area. Therefore, they are located:
· At least 100 kilometres from the closest town with a census population of 130,000, and
· At least 100 kilometres from the closest town with a census population of between 14,000 to less than 130,000.
The employees to whom the payments are provided will be current employees at the time of the payments.
The employees will carry out their duties in the remote location. No employee in respect of whom the housing assistance will be provided works within 100 kilometres of any large regional centre.
Other employers in your industry provide housing assistance to employees.
The accommodation is provided because of the employment relationship between you and the employees.
There will be no other connection between you and the employees that may lead to a conclusion that they are not acting independently in relation to this matter.
The arrangements are not being entered into for the purpose of enabling you to obtain the benefit of the application of subsection 60(2) or 60(2A) of the FBTAA.
Relevant legislative provisions
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 60(2),
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 60(2A),
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 142(1),
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 142(1A)
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 142(2E).
Reasons for decision
Question 1
Subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA, provides for a 50% reduction of the taxable value of expense payment fringe benefits in respect of remote area housing loan interest payments where all the following conditions are met:
1. The recipient of the relevant expense payment fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to a year of tax is an employee of the employer.
2. The recipient's expenditure is in respect of interest in respect of a remote area housing loan connected with a dwelling.
3. The recipient occupied or used the dwelling as his or her usual place of residence during the period the interest accrued.
4. The fringe benefit was not provided under a non-arm's length arrangement or under an arrangement that was entered into by any of the parties to the arrangement to enable the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the subsection.
Condition one:
You will pay interest expenses your employees incur in relation to their housing loans. Therefore you are providing expense payment fringe benefits to your employees. Condition one is met.
Condition two:
The expenditure that the employees incur must be for interest 'in respect of a remote area housing loan connected with a dwelling'.
Under subsection 142(1) of the FBTAA a 'remote area housing loan connected with a dwelling' is a reference to a housing loan related to a dwelling where the following requirements are satisfied:
i) During the whole of the period in the year of tax when the employee occupied or used the dwelling as his or her usual place of residence:
· the dwelling was not at a location in, or adjacent to, an eligible urban area, and
· the employee was a current employee of the employer and the usual place of employment of the employee was not at a location in, or adjacent to, an eligible urban area (that is, the relevant employment is in a remote area).
ii) The common conditions set out in subsection 142(2E) of the FBTAA are satisfied in relation to the occupation period. The aforementioned common conditions are:
(a) it was customary for employers in the industry in which the employee was employed to provide housing assistance to their employees at the relevant times.
(b) it would be concluded that it was necessary for the employer to provide or arrange for the provision of housing assistance to its employees because either:
· There was not, at or near, the place where the employees were employed sufficient suitable residential accommodation for them (other than that provided by or on behalf of the employer).
· It was customary for the employers in the industry in which the employee was employed to provide housing assistance to their employees at the relevant times.
iii) The loan was not made to the employee pursuant to a non-arm's length arrangement nor under an arrangement that was entered into by any of the parties to enable the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of section 60 of the FBTAA.
You will pay employees' interest expenses they incur on homes loans:
· for dwellings that they occupy as their usual place of residence
· where the dwellings are in a location that is not adjacent to an eligible urban area, and
· whilst they are current employees with a usual place of employment that is at a location not adjacent to an eligible urban area.
It has been customary for employers in your industry to provide subsidised housing to employees in remote areas. It has been necessary to provide subsidised housing because of the remote location and often there is a lack of suitable housing.
You have stated that the housing assistance is provided because of the employment relationship with your employees and that there is no other connection between you and your employees that would lead to the conclusion that the employees were not acting independently in relation to the housing assistance.
This indicates that the benefits will be provided in respect of loans made at arm's length and not entered into in order to obtain the benefit of the concession in section 60 of the FBTAA.
Since the home loans meet the requirements of a remote area housing loan in connection with a dwelling under subsection 142(1) of the FBTAA, you satisfy condition two of subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA.
Condition three:
Since employees are only eligible for housing assistance for accommodation that is their usual place of residence, this condition is satisfied.
Condition four:
You will provide housing assistance as part of your strategy for attracting and retaining staff. Consequently, the benefits will be provided under arm's length arrangements and there is nothing to indicate that they will be provided so that you would receive the benefit of the concession. You therefore meet this condition.
As all of the conditions in subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA have been met, the taxable value of any expense payment fringe benefits that you provide in relation to interest incurred on a remote area housing loan may be reduced by 50%. This will be the case regardless of when the loan was made.
Question 2
Subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA, provides for a reduction of the taxable value of expense payment fringe benefits by 50% of the gross rent incurred by the employee in respect of remote area housing rent where all the following conditions are met:
1. The recipient of the relevant expense payment fringe benefit in relation to an employer in relation to a year of tax is an employee of the employer.
2. The recipient's expenditure is in respect of remote area housing rent connected with a unit of accommodation.
3. The recipient occupied or used the unit of accommodation as his or her usual place of residence during the period the rent accrued.
4. The fringe benefit was not provided under a non-arm's length arrangement or under an arrangement that was entered into by any of the parties to the arrangement to enable the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of the subsection.
Condition one:
This condition is met as you will pay rent for residential housing incurred by your employees.
Condition two:
The expenditure that the employee incurs must be for remote area housing rent connected with a unit of accommodation.
The necessary requirements for the existence of 'remote area housing rent connected with a unit of accommodation' are set out in subsection 142(1A) of the FBTAA, as follows:
(i) During the whole of the period in the year of tax when the employee occupied or used the unit of accommodation as his or her usual place of residence:
· the dwelling was not at a location in, or adjacent to, an eligible urban area, and
· the employee was a current employee of the employer and the usual place of employment of the employee was not at a location in, or adjacent to, an eligible urban area (that is, the relevant employment is in a remote area).
(ii) The common conditions set out in subsection 142(2E) of the FBTAA are satisfied in relation to the occupation period.
(iii) The lease or licence was not granted to the employee pursuant to a non-arm's length arrangement nor under an arrangement that was entered into by any of the parties to enable the employer to obtain the benefit of the application of section 60 of the FBTAA.
You will pay employees' expenses they incur:
· on rent on units of accommodation that they occupy as their usual place of residence
· where the accommodation is in a location that is not adjacent to an eligible urban area, and
· whilst they are current employees with a usual place of employment that is at a location not adjacent to an eligible urban area.
As with question one you satisfy all of the common conditions set out in 142(2E) of the FBTAA.
You have stated that the housing assistance is provided because of the employment relationship with your employees and that there is no other connection between you and your employees that would lead to the conclusion that the employees were not acting independently in relation to the housing assistance.
This indicates that the benefits will be provided in respect of leases or licenses granted at arm's length and that the employees will not enter into leases or licenses in order for you to obtain the benefit of the concession in section 60 of the FBTAA.
Condition two of subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA is met therefore because the rent incurred by your employees in respect of a unit of accommodation satisfies the requirements of subsection 142(1A) of the FBTAA.
Condition three:
As stated in question one, this condition is satisfied.
Condition four:
As stated in question one, this condition is satisfied.
As all of the conditions in subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA have been met, the taxable value of any expense payment fringe benefits that you provide in relation to remote area housing rent may be reduced by 50%. This will be the case regardless of when the employee commenced to rent the unit of accommodation.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).