Disclaimer
This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au

This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011543866023

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Managed investment trust

Question 1

In relation to the 2010-11 income year and all future income years (subject to the maximum period allowed by the Commissioner), will the trust continue to be a 'managed investment trust' (MIT) for the purpose of section 12-400 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA)?

Answer

Yes, in relation to the 2010-11 income year to the 2019-20 income year (inclusive), the trust will continue to be a MIT.

Question 2

Will the trust be required to withhold income tax on the 'fund payment part' (the Fund Payment Part) within the meaning of subsection 840-805(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) of any distributions because of section 12-385 of Schedule 1 of the TAA and will such tax be levied at rates not greater than 7.5% in relation to the 2010-11 income year and all future income years (subject to the maximum period allowed by the Commissioner)?

Answer

Yes, in relation to the 2010-11 income year to the 2019-20 income year (inclusive), the trust will be liable to withhold an amount from the Fund Payment Part of any distributions because of section 12-385 of Schedule 1 of the TAA and such tax will be levied at rates not greater than 7.5%.

Question 3

In relation to the 2010-11 income year and all future income years (subject to the maximum period allowed by the Commissioner), will the amounts subject to tax referred to at Question 2 represent non-assessable non-exempt income of the trustee or the trust in accordance with section 840-815 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes, in relation to the 2010-11 income year to the 2019-20 income year (inclusive), the amounts subject to tax referred to at Question 2 will represent non-assessable non-exempt income of the trustee and the trust.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2011

Year ended 30 June 2012

Year ended 30 June 2013

Year ended 30 June 2014

Year ended 30 June 2015

Year ended 30 June 2016

Year ended 30 June 2017

Year ended 30 June 2018

Year ended 30 June 2019

Year ended 30 June 2020

The scheme commences on

The scheme has not yet commenced.

Relevant facts and circumstances

It is proposed that 100% of the units in the trust will become owned by Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2. Acquirer 2 will acquire less than 75% of the units in the trust. Acquirer 1 will acquire the remainder. Both Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 will own their units both legally and beneficially and not on trust or as nominees on behalf of any other entity.

Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 are not residents of Australia.

The Acquirers are related entities, with all of the securities in Acquirer 2 being owned by Acquirer 1.

The Acquirers and the trust are unrelated at the present time.

The Acquirers are 'real estate investment trusts' (REITs) formed in country X.

Acquirer 1 has more than 50 members (shareholders).

Acquirer 1 will hold its interest in the trust in its own name, i.e., that interest will not be held in the name of the trustees of Acquirer 1. Likewise, Acquirer 2 will hold its interest in the trust in its own name and that interest will not be held in the name of the trustees of Acquirer 2.

Each of the Acquirers carries on business in country X. In this regard, all management (including strategic and operational) and decision-making by the Acquirers is carried on in country X. Furthermore, all or a significant majority of their management personnel (including all or a significant majority of their trustees) are located in country X, and all or a significant majority of Board meetings are and will be conducted in country X.

The trustee of the trust is a company constituted under the Corporations Act 2001 and is the responsible entity of the trust. The trustee is a financial services licensee (as defined in section 761A of the Corporations Act 2001) and its licence covers operating the managed investment scheme. The trust is registered under section 601EB of the Corporations Act 2001 and will continue to be registered.

The trust is a managed investment scheme that has been registered under Chapter 5C of the Corporations Act 2001.

The trust is currently a MIT for the purposes of subdivision 12-H of Schedule 1 of the TAA as it satisfied all the relevant requirements under section 12-400 of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

The trust will invest in land primarily for the purpose of deriving rent.

The trust's year of income ends on 30 June.

The trustee will manage all of the assets of the trust in Australia. A management agreement will be entered into between Acquirer 1 and the trustee in terms of which the trustee shall provide, and be responsible for, the day to day management of the trust's businesses, operations and properties and the investment management activities pertaining to the trust. The management agreement will ensure that Acquirer 1 is consulted on the more significant aspects of the trust's operations which require Acquirer 1 approval. It is likely that an affiliate of the trustee will be appointed as the responsible entity of the trust and will replace the trustee under the management agreement and be bound by the terms of that agreement.

Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 will provide to the trustee a postal address located in country X and/or Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 will direct the trustee to make distribution payments to a location in country X.

Assumptions

At all relevant times, there will not be any individual who owns 10% or more of the shares in Acquirer 1.

At all relevant times, the parties to the draft management agreement will carry out their activities in the manner envisioned in the draft management agreement (or any replacement agreement which is on substantially the same terms as the draft management agreement).

At all relevant times, substantially all of the tasks which are to be performed by the trustee in terms of the draft management agreement will be performed in Australia whether or not the tasks are in fact performed by another entity.

Does Part IVA, or any other anti-avoidance provision, apply to this ruling?

Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 is a general anti-avoidance rule that can apply in certain circumstances if you or another taxpayer obtains a tax benefit in connection with an arrangement and it can be concluded that the arrangement, or any part of it, was entered into or carried out by any person for the dominant purpose of enabling a tax benefit to be obtained. If Part IVA applies the tax benefit can be cancelled, for example, by disallowing a deduction that was otherwise allowable.

We have not fully considered the application of Part IVA to the arrangement you asked us to rule on, or to an associated or wider arrangement of which that arrangement is part.

If you want us to rule on whether Part IVA applies we will first need to obtain and consider all the facts about the arrangement which are relevant to determining whether Part IVA may apply.

For more information on Part IVA, go to our website www.ato.gov.au and enter 'part iva general' in the search box on the top right of the page, then select: Part IVA: the general anti-avoidance rule for income tax.

Relevant legislative provisions

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 section 12-385

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 section 12-400

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 section 12-401

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 section 12-402

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 subparagraph 12-402(3)(e)

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 section 12-402B

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 section 12-403

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 section 12-404

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 section 18-32

Taxation Administration Act 1953 section 8AAXD

Taxation Administration Act 1953 section 8AAZLA

Taxation Administration Act 1953 section 8AAZLB,

Taxation Administration Regulations 1976 subregulation 44E(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 102M

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 102N

Corporations Act 2001 section 9

Corporations Act 2001 section 601EB

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 840-805

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 840-815

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 960-130(1)

Income Tax (Managed Investment Trust Withholding Tax) Act 2008 Section 4

Question 1

Summary

The trust will continue to be a MIT.

Detailed reasoning

Subdivision 12-H of Schedule 1 of the TAA deals with pay as you go (PAYG) withholding obligations for 'fund payments' for the purposes of subsection 12-405(1) of Schedule 1 of the TAA (Fund Payments).

Under subsection 12-400(1) of Schedule 1 of the TAA, there are various requirements that need to be satisfied in determining whether a particular trust is a MIT.

Subsection 12-400(1) defines a trust to be a 'managed investment trust' if:

The residency requirement (subparagraph 12-400(1)(a) of Schedule 1 of the TAA)

This requirement is clearly satisfied by the trust because the following requirements will be satisfied at all times in the future because:

No trading requirement (subparagraph 12-400(1)(b) of Schedule 1 of the TAA)

A trust covered by subsection 12-400(2) of Schedule 1 of the TAA cannot qualify as a MIT. Subsection 12-400(2) provides:

The trust will not be covered by subsection 12-400(2) of Schedule 1 of the TAA because the trust will not be a trading trust (as defined in section 102N of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (the ITAA 1936)). Specifically, the trust will not carry on a 'trading business' nor will it control, or have the ability to control, directly or indirectly, the affairs or operations of another person in respect of the carrying on by that other person of a trading business. A 'trading business' is defined in section 102M of the ITAA 1936 as a business that does not consist wholly of eligible business activities (also as defined in section 102M of the ITAA 1936).

At present and as is contemplated for future years, the trust will continue to invest in land primarily for the purpose of deriving rent which is an eligible investment business under section 102M of the ITAA 1936.

Investment management activities carried out in Australia

A substantial proportion of investment management activities must be carried out in Australia: see subparagraph 12-400(1)(c) of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

The Revised Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (2010 Measures No. 3) Act 2010 (the Amending Act) contains the following comments which provide some insight as to what was meant by a 'substantial proportion':

Example 5.4 of the Revised Explanatory Memorandum concludes that an offshore fund manager conducts a 'substantial proportion' of the investment management activities if it 'does preparatory work around market analysis, identifying potential investments and carrying out due diligence on potential investments.'

The trustee (an Australian resident company) will continue to manage all of the assets of the trust in Australia. The trustee will not delegate any of its functions as operator and manager to any party outside of Australia.

The trust will continue to be operated and managed by the trustee. The trustee will continue to be remunerated on an arm's length basis out of the trust's assets for the services which it will continue to provide (as it currently does).

A management agreement will be entered into between Acquirer 1 and the trustee. In terms of the management agreement, the trustee shall provide, and be responsible for, the day to day management of the trust's businesses, operations and properties and the investment management activities pertaining to the trust. This includes the real estate investment and business management services.

The management agreement provides a very broad mandate for the trustee to conduct the significant majority of the investment and business management activities of the trust, which includes and is not limited to:

The management agreement is intended to ensure that Acquirer 1 is consulted on the more significant aspects of the trust's operations which require Acquirer 1 approval. The management agreement is not intended to usurp the trustee's role as operator and manager of the trust. Instead, the management agreement is intended to ensure that Acquirer 1 has appropriate oversight over the operation of the trust. This ensures that Acquirer 1 is consulted and approves decisions already made by the trustee, as opposed to Acquirer 1 actually making any decisions on behalf of the trustee.

In the present circumstances, it is considered that a substantial proportion of investment management activities take place in Australia.

Managed investment scheme

The trust must be a 'managed investment scheme' (see subparagraph 12-400(1)(d) of Schedule 1 of the TAA).

The trust will be a managed investment scheme under section 9 of the Corporations Act 2001 after the completion of the acquisition. This will continue to be the case at the time of all future Fund Payments being made.

Wholesale membership

The trust must either be a trust with 'wholesale membership' (subparagraph 12-400(1)(e)(i) of Schedule 1 of the TAA) or it must be registered under section 601EB of the Corporations Act 2001.

Section 12-401 of Schedule 1 of the TAA provides:

After the acquisition by the Acquirers, the trust will not be required to be registered even though it will still be registered. Subsection 601ED(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 does not require registration where a product disclosure statement is not required to be given under Division 2 of Part 7.9 of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to issues in the trust (i.e. the trust has no retail clients). Here, as only Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 hold units in the trust (both of which are wholesale clients), the trust is not required to be registered. Because Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 are the only members, paragraphs 12-401(b) and 12-401(c) of Schedule 1 of the TAA are also satisfied.

Hence, the trust will be covered by section 12-401 of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

Section 601EB of the Corporations Act 2001 registration

If the trust was not a trust with 'wholesale membership' it must be registered under section 601EB of the Corporations Act 2001 (subparagraph 12-400(1)(e)(ii) of Schedule 1 of the TAA).

The trust is registered under section 601EB of the Corporations Act 2001.

Hence, even if the trust is not covered by section 12-401 of Schedule 1 of the TAA, it would satisfy the alternative requirement in subparagraph 12-400(1)(e)(ii) of Schedule 1 of the TAA because it is in fact registered under section 601EB of the Corporations Act 2001.

Widely held

A trust must satisfy the widely held requirements in subparagraph 12-400(1)(f) of Schedule 1 of the TAA. The widely held requirements are set out in subsections 12-402(1) and 12-402(1A) of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

To apply those provisions it is necessary to ascertain the number of members of the trust. The number of members is determined under subsection 12-402(2) of Schedule 1 of the TAA 1953 which provides:

In determining the number of members, it is necessary to decide whether Acquirer 1 is covered by subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA. If Acquirer 1 is covered by subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA, its 'MIT participation interest' will be multiplied by 50 (see subparagraphs 12-402(2)(a)(ii) and 12-402(2)(c) of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

For the reasons discussed below, it is considered that Acquirer 1 is covered by subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

As explained below, Acquirer 1 has a 'MIT participation interest' (as defined in section 12-404) of 100% in the trust. 100% multiplied by 50 equals 50. Hence, Acquirer 1 will be counted as 50 members.

As explained below, because Acquirer 2 is wholly owned by Acquirer 1 and has only one member, it fails the requirement that it must have at least 50 members. Acquirer 2 is therefore not an entity covered by paragraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA. As Acquirer 2 is not covered by subparagraph 12-402(3)(e), it only counts as one member (see subparagraphs 12-402(2)(a)(i) and 12-402(2)(b) of Schedule 1 of the TAA).

Applying the above methodology results in the trust being deemed to have 51 members.

The trust will satisfy the widely held requirement contained in both section 12-402(1) and 12-402(1A) of Schedule 1 of the TAA because it will be considered to have 51 members (i.e. more than 25 members as required by section 12-402(1) and more than 50 members as required by 12-402(1A)). Accordingly, even if the trust is not covered by 12-401, the trust will still satisfy the widely held requirement by being able to satisfy 12-402(IA).

Entity covered by subsection 12-402(3) of Schedule 1 of the TAA

Subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA includes:

an entity that is recognised under a foreign law as being used for collective investment by means of pooling the contributions of at least 50 members of the entity as consideration to acquire rights to benefits produced by the entity, if the members of the entity do not have day-to-day control over the operation of the entity.

According to paragraph 5.79 of the Revised Explanatory Memorandum to the Amending Act, subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA targets:

…a foreign collective investment vehicle, which is an entity with at least 50 members that is recognised under a foreign law as being used for collective investment where the member contributions are pooled together in exchange for rights to the benefits produced by the entity and where members do not have day-to-day control over the operation of the entity...

Therefore, Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 must be recognised under a foreign law as being used for collective investment and the entity itself must also satisfy the remaining three requirements of subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA. That is, Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 must involve:

· the pooling of contributions of at least 50 members of the entity;

· as consideration to acquire rights to benefits produced by the entity; and

· the members not having day to day control over the operation of the entity.

'recognised under a foreign law as being used for collective investment'

The first requirement involves the entity being recognised under a foreign law as an entity which is used for collective investment.

Both Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 were formed in country X. The law of formation of the entity in country X is expressed to be subject to certain provisions of country X's tax laws and must be read together with those tax laws where applicable. Those specific provisions of country X's tax laws apply to Acquirer 1 but not to Acquirer 2.

Therefore, the country X tax laws must be considered alongside the law of formation when considering whether the foreign law recognises Acquirer 1 as being used for collective investment for the purposes of subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA. As Acquirer 2 does not qualify under the country X tax laws, only the law of formation is the relevant foreign law in relation to Acquirer 2.

This definition of a REIT under country X's law of formation contemplates a profit-making purpose of the entity for the benefit of more than one person (the shareholders), which indicates a recognition by the law of formation that the entity is being used for collective investment.

Therefore, both Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 are recognised under a foreign law as being used for collective investment.

'pooling of contributions of at least 50 members of the entity'

Subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA requires that the entity pool the contributions of at least 50 members.

While the law of formation does not contain a requirement as to the number of shareholders necessary for a REIT, country X's tax laws require the shares to be owned by more than 50 persons.

The foreign law is consistent with the notion of pooling of contributions of at least 50 members as required under subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

Therefore, as Acquirer 1 qualifies as a REIT under country X's tax laws, there is a pooling of the contributions of at least 50 members of the entity.

However, as Acquirer 2 is wholly owned by Acquirer 1 and therefore has only one member, it fails the requirement that it have at least 50 members. Acquirer 2 is therefore not an entity covered by subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

'as consideration to acquire rights to benefits produced by the entity'

Subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA requires there be consideration from the 50 or more members of the entity to acquire rights to benefits produced by the entity.

The Declaration of Trust of Acquirer 1 states that the shares in Acquirer 1 will be validly issued by Acquirer 1 upon receipt of full consideration for which they have been issued. Therefore, Acquirer 1 satisfies the condition under subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA that contributions are made as consideration to acquire rights to benefits produced by Acquirer 1.

'members of the entity do not have day-to-day control over the operation of the entity'

The final requirement in subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA is that the members of the entity do not have day-to-day control over the operation of the entity. The law of formation provides for the election of trustees. Further, country X's tax laws require a REIT to be managed by its trustees or directors.

Therefore, the members of Acquirer 1 do not have day-to-day control over the operation of the entity. Acquirer 1 therefore satisfies this final requirement of paragraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

Conclusion

As each of the elements are satisfied in relation to Acquirer 1, Acquirer 1 is an entity covered by subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

However, Acquirer 2, being wholly owned by Acquirer 1 and therefore having only one member, is not an entity covered by subparagraph 12-402(3)(e) of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

MIT participation interest

For the purposes of subparagraph 12-402(2)(c) of Schedule 1 of the TAA, it is necessary to determine Acquirer 1's 'MIT participation interest' in MlF.

A 'MIT participation interest' is defined in section 12-404 of Schedule 1 of the TAA which provides:

Acquirer 1 will have a 100% MIT participation interest in the trust because of its direct and indirect interests in the trust (through its ownership of 100% of the shares in Acquirer 2).

Not closely held

A trust must satisfy the 'closely held' requirements in section 12-402B of Schedule 1 of the TAA (see subparagraph 12-400(1)(g) of Schedule 1 of the TAA).

Section 12-402B of Schedule 1 of the TAA provides:

If subparagraph 12-400(1)(e)(i) of Schedule 1 of the TAA applies (i.e. trusts with wholesale membership in terms of section 12-401), it will be necessary to satisfy subparagraph 12-402B(1)(a) of Schedule 1 of the TAA. 10 or fewer persons must not have a total MIT participation interest of 75% or more.

Acquirer 1 is an entity covered by section 12-402(3) of Schedule 1 of the TAA and its MIT participation interest is disregarded for the purposes of the closely-held restrictions: see subparagraph 12-402B(2)(a) of Schedule 1 of the TAA. Acquirer 2 will be considered to have a MIT participation interest of less than 75%. Accordingly, only one person (Acquirer 2) will be considered to have a MIT participation interest but this will be less than 75%. This condition will be satisfied.

Alternatively, if subparagraph 12-400(1)(e)(ii) of Schedule 1 of the TAA applies (i.e. trusts which do not have wholesale membership in terms of section 12-401), it will be necessary to satisfy subparagraph 12-402B(1)(b) of Schedule 1 of the TAA. 20 or fewer persons must not have a total MIT participation interest of 75% or more.

Again, Acquirer 1 is an entity covered by subsection 12-402(3) of Schedule 1 of the TAA and its MIT participation interest is disregarded for the purposes of the closely-held restrictions: see subparagraph 12-402B(2)(a) of Schedule 1 of the TAA. Acquirer 2 will be considered to have a MIT participation interest of less than 75%. Accordingly, only one person (Acquirer 2) will be considered to have a MIT participation interest but this will be less than 75%. This condition will be satisfied.

Subparagraph 12-402B(1)(c) of Schedule 1 of the TAA imposes the requirement that a foreign resident individual must not have a MIT participation interest of 10% or more. Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 own all the units in the trust. However, they are not individuals. Moreover, there are no individual investors in Acquirer 1 which own 10% or more of the shares in Acquirer 1. Hence, this requirement is satisfied.

Licensing requirement

Subparagraph 12-400(1)(h) of Schedule 1 of the TAA provides that, if the trust is covered by section 12-401 of Schedule 1 of the TAA, the trust must satisfy the licensing requirements in section 12-403 of Schedule 1 of the TAA.

Subparagraph 12-403(1)(a)(i) of Schedule 1 of the TAA requires the trustee to hold an Australian financial services licence whose licence covers it providing financial services to wholesale clients. The trustee holds the requisite licence.

Question 2

Summary

The trust will be liable to withhold an amount from the Fund Payment Part and such tax will be levied at rates not greater than 7.5%.

Detailed reasoning

Section 12-385 of Schedule 1 of the TAA provides that the trustee of a MIT that makes a fund payment to an entity covered by section 12-410 of Schedule 1 of the TAA must withhold an amount from the fund payment. In the 2010-11 income year and following, the rate of withholding is 7.5% if the address or place for payment of the recipient is in an information exchange country. However, the trustee does not need to deduct an amount if no MIT withholding tax is payable by the beneficiary.

MIT

The trust must be a MIT (see subparagraph 840-805(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997).

It has been concluded in relation to Question 1, above, that the trust is a MIT for the purposes of section 12-400.

Fund Payment

The MIT withholding tax is imposed on the Fund Payment Part of the distribution. Question 2 only deals with the Fund Payment Part. Question 2 does not deal with any other part of the distribution.

Address

On the present facts, Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 will provide to the trustee their country X postal addresses and/or Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 will direct the trustee to pay their fund payments to a country X location.

Rate

Country X is an information exchange country. The trust has a year that ends on 30 June. Therefore, the rate of withholding for the 2010-11 income year and following years is 7.5%.

In that case, the trustee will be obliged to withhold 7.5% from the Fund Payment Part of any distribution made to Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 in the 2010-11 income year and following years.

Liable to MIT withholding tax

However, the trustee will not be obliged to withhold any amount if MIT withholding tax is not imposed under subdivision 840-M of the ITAA 1997 in respect of Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2.

Subsections 840-805(1) and (2) of the ITAA 1997 provide:

MIT

As explained above, the trust will be a MIT for the present purposes.

Fund Payment

The present facts involve the Fund Payment Part of the distribution.

Beneficiary not trustee of another trust

The Acquirers will be unitholders in the trust and accordingly they will be beneficiaries of the trust.

Subparagraph 840-805(2)(c) of the ITAA 1997 has the effect that MIT withholding tax is not imposed on a beneficiary which is a trustee of another trust. It is therefore necessary to decide whether Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 are beneficiaries who are trustees of another trust.

Both Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 are REITs which are established as a statutory vehicle (a juridical person) under the law of formation in country X. It is therefore necessary to consider the nature of a REIT established under the law of formation and compare this to the nature of a 'trust' for the purposes of section 840-805 of the ITAA 1997.

Ford and Lee in the Principles of the Law of Trusts defines a trust for the purposes of Australian law at paragraph 1.010 as follows:

The law of formation prescribes features which make a country X REIT different to a trust relationship as is envisaged in section 840-805 of the ITAA 1997. Notably, the law of formation outlines a number of features of a REIT which add weight to the finding that a REIT is not receiving the fund payment in its capacity as a trustee of another trust. These features include -

It follows from these features under the law of formation that a REIT established under that law is not akin to a trust under Australian law.

In the present case, the interest in the trust will be held by Acquirer 1 or Acquirer 2. The interest in the trust will not be held by the trustees of Acquirer 1 or the trustees of Acquirer 2.

In these circumstances, Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 will own the legal and beneficial title to the trust and therefore will not receive the fund payment in their capacity as trustees of another trust for the purposes of section 840-805 of the ITAA 1997.

Foreign resident

Neither of the Acquirers will be an Australian resident for the purposes of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. As the Acquirers are not Australian residents, they will be foreign residents: see subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997. Accordingly subparagraph 840-805(2)(d) of the ITAA 1997 will be satisfied.

Conclusion

Accordingly, Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 will be liable to MIT withholding tax imposed under subdivision 840-M of the ITAA 1997.

Hence, the trustee must deduct 7.5% from the Fund Payment Part of any distribution made to Acquirer 1 and Acquirer 2 in the 2010-11 income year and future years.

Question 3

Summary

The Fund Payment Part will represent non-assessable non-exempt income of the trustee and the trust.

Detailed reasoning

Section 840-815 of the ITAA 1997 provides:

In the present case, the Fund Payment Part will represent non-assessable non-exempt income of the trustee and the trust. This amount will not be included in the assessable income of the trustee or the trust by virtue of sections 6-15 and 6-23 of the ITAA 1997.

Future years

It is noted that private rulings are subject to changes in the law or the facts. If the law changes in the future or if there is a change in the facts in a material particular, this ruling cannot be relied upon to that extent. Also, if there is a change in a material particular in respect of the assumed facts, this ruling cannot be relied upon. Of course, an immaterial change will not affect the binding nature of this private ruling.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).