Disclaimer
This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au

This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011564645637

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Employee equity program

Question 1

Will the irretrievable contributions to the trustee of the trust be income of the trust?

Answer

No.

Question 2

Will a capital gain or capital loss arise to the trustee of the trust at the time when the employees become absolutely entitled to the company X shares?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ending 31 December 2008

Year ending 31 December 2009

Year ending 31 December 2010

Year ending 31 December 2011

Year ending 31 December 2012

Year ending 31 December 2013

Year ending 31 December 2014

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2008

Relevant facts and circumstances

The taxpayer company (the taxpayer) established an employee share trust (EST) to facilitate the provision of its shares to its employees.

The taxpayer applied for a private ruling on how the taxation law applies to its employee share schemes.

The taxpayer operates an Australian based business and has implemented employee share schemes.

The purpose of the employee share schemes can be summarised as follows:

The application states that the EST is intended to operate in accordance with the trust deed, as a sole purpose trust to acquire shares for participants in share schemes and accordingly hold the shares in trust for eligible employees.

The trust deed states, that the trust will be managed and administered so that it satisfies the sole activities test for the purposes of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) and that it will be an 'employee share trust' as defined in subsection 130-85(4) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997).

The EST will be funded by contributions from the taxpayer for the purchase of the shares under the share schemes.

Shares acquired by the EST will be allocated to employees who will become absolutely entitled to them.

The structure of the EST and the rules of each employee share plan are such that shares allocated to each employee will generally be transferred into the name of the relevant employee as soon as practicable.

The trustee will be permitted to sell shares on behalf of an employee where the relevant rules permit.

It is common for taxpayers to use a trust to facilitate the provision of shares to employees as part of equity based employee incentive strategies.

The commercial benefits of using a trust includes:

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Subsection 6-5(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that assessable income includes income according to ordinary concepts.

In Scott v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation HCA 48, Windeyer J held that the concept of ordinary income depends upon its quality in the hands of the recipient.

In G.P. International Pipecoaters Pty Ltd v. FC of T 90 ATC 4420, the High Court considered the following factors were important in determining the nature of the receipt:

In Campbell and Anor v. Inland Revenue Commissioner 1970 AC 77, the House of Lords considered that covenanted payments made to a trust for the purposes of buying property were not income of the trustee. The payments were held to be instalments of capital in the hands of the trustee as they were paid under a contract that required those payments to be applied to the purchase of property.

In addition the House of Lords held that:

In trustee of the Estate Mortgage Fighting Fund EST v. FCT 2000 ATC 4525 the Federal court considered that funds contributed to the Fighting Fund trust for the purposes of funding litigation for beneficiaries, upon solicitation by the trustee, were capital in nature.

The purpose of the contributions by company X to the trust is to procure shares to satisfy awards made to employees under a company X equity plan. The trust deed deems all funds received by the trustee from company X as corpus of the trust, which is consistent with the views outlined in the cases above.

Whilst the above factors suggest that the contributions made to the trustee of the trust are non assessable, the following ATO Interpretative Decisions have also been taken into consideration when making the decision:

In this case, the Commissioner held that:-

The facts of ATO ID 2002/965 appear to directly align with the facts present in this case. Accordingly, the funds contributed to the trust are not considered to be a reward for services provided by the trust nor a gain realised in relation to an asset.

Instead, the funds will be used in accordance with the trust deed and plan rules for the sole purpose of providing shares for the benefit of employees. In receiving the contributed amounts, it is considered that the trustee of the trust has not derived assessable income pursuant to section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.

Question 2

Application of former section 130-90 of the ITAA 1997 and specifically subsection130-90(3) of the ITAA 1997 for application from 7.30 p.m. on 13 May 2008.

An employee becomes absolutely entitled to the shares when they are acquired by the trustee and allocated to the employee such that the shares are held on the employee's behalf by the trustee.

In these circumstances, under section 104-75 of the ITAA 1997, CGT Event E5 applies at the time the employee becomes absolutely entitled to the shares as against the trustee - which will be when those shares are allocated to the employee. A capital gain or capital loss will arise in circumstances where the market value of the shares at the time that the employee becomes absolutely entitled to the shares is different to the cost base of the shares held by the trustee.

However, there should be no capital gain or loss to the trustee on the basis that the cost base of the shares acquired by the trustee (that is, the amount paid for the shares) should be equal to the market value of the shares since the trustee will acquire the shares on market for their market value which becomes the shares cost base and immediately allocate those shares to employees giving rise to a deemed sale price of their market value at that time.

Alternatively, the trustee will acquire the shares via a new issue from company X, the acquisition price being equal to the market value of the shares as determined by the board which again, becomes the shares cost base and immediately allocate those shares to employees giving rise to a deemed sale price of their market value at that time.

Therefore no capital gain should arise to the trustee of the trust due to the acquisition price of the shares to the trustee and the market value of the shares at the time the employees become absolutely entitled to the shares being the same.

In addition, section 130-90 of the ITAA 1997 should also apply to exempt any capital gains tax liability to the trustee.

Section 130-90 of the ITAA 1997 provides that:

On the basis of the following, we consider that the employee becoming absolutely entitled to the shares under the company X equity plans will not cause the trustee of the trust to have a capital gain or loss:-

It is noted that amendments to subsection 130-90(3) of the ITAA 1997 from 13 May 2008 brought shares acquired from exercising a right under an employee share scheme within the provisions of former section 130-90 of the ITAA 1997.

For the reasons detailed above, it is submitted that there should be no capital gain or capital loss to the trustee of the trust when the shares are transferred by the trustee of the trust to the executives and/or employees under each of the company X equity plans.

Application of the new section 130-90 of the ITAA 1997 to employee share rights

The new section 130-90 of the ITAA 1997 was introduced as part of the Taxation Laws Amendment (2009 Budget Measures No. 2) Bill and applies in relation to the ESS interests mentioned in subsections 83A-5(1) and 83A-5(2) of the Income Tax Transitional Provisions Act 1997 (ITTPA 1997).

The new section 130-90 of the ITAA 1997 states:

Subsections 83A-5(1) and 83A-5(2) of the ITTPA 1997 provide that:

Therefore rights issued to employees of company X under a company X rights plan before 1 July 2009 will fall within the application of subsections 83A-5(1) and 83A-5(2) of the ITTPA 1997 where, in broad terms, the cessation time mentioned in subsection 139B(3) of the ITAA 1936 had not occurred prior to 1 July 2009.

Employee share trust

Subsection 130-85(4) of the ITAA 1997 defines an employee share trust as:

ATO ID 2010/108 is relevant to the Commissioner's views on whether a trust is an employee share trust within the meaning of subsection 130-85(4) of the ITAA 1997.

The trust is an employee share trust, as defined in subsection 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 as the activities of the trust in acquiring and allocating ESS interests meet the requirements of paragraphs 130-85(4)(a) and 130-85(4)(b) of the ITAA 1997 and its other activities (general powers) are merely incidental to those activities in accordance to paragraph 130-85(4)(c) of the ITAA 1997.

This conclusion is supported by the trust deed which stipulates that the trustee must manage the trust as to satisfy the sole activities test under Division 13A of the ITAA 1997 and be an employee share trust as defined.

The trust deed outlines the permitted activities of the trust. The functions of the trust are limited to those activities mentioned in paragraph 130-85(4)(a) and 130-85(4)(b) of the ITAA 1997, or are merely incidental activities as per paragraph 130-85(4)(c) of the ITAA 1997.

Disregarding the capital gain or loss

Paragraph 130-90(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 requires the capital gain or capital loss made by the employee share trust to result from either CGT event E5 or E7.

CGT event E5 will occur at the time when the beneficiary becomes presently entitled to a CGT asset (subsection 104-75(2) of the ITAA 1997). Where shares are allocated to employees on the exercise of rights under rights plans, CGT event E5 occurs at this time.

Paragraphs 130-90(1)(b), 130-90(1)(c) and 130-90(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997 are satisfied on the basis that the employees become absolutely entitled to shares by exercising rights which are subject to taxation under Subdivision 83A-C of the ITAA 1997.

Subsection 130-90(2) of the ITAA 1997 is satisfied on the basis the beneficiary will not acquire the beneficial interest in the share for more than its cost base in the hands of the employee share trust at the time of CGT event E5.

Therefore, there will be no capital gain or loss to the trustee of the trust at the time the employee becomes absolutely entitled to the shares arising form company X equity plans provided subsection 130-90(2) of the ITAA 1997 is satisfied.

Tax treatment of shares under the new law

Subsection 130-85(2) of the ITAA 1997 applies to interests in employee share trusts. It will apply to the employee deferred share plan (DSP) because:

As discussed above, the trust is considered to qualify as an employee share trust, as defined.

Subsection 130-85(2) of the ITAA 1997states:

The effect of subsection 130-85(2) of the ITAA 1997 is that the employee is taken to be absolutely entitled to the share from the time that it is acquired by the employee under the employee share scheme.

The time of acquisition occurs when:

As you have advised that the shares acquired by the trustee in respect of the deferred share plan are to be allocated by the trustee to the employees at the same time as the trustee enters into the contract to acquire the shares, the time of acquisition of the shares by the trustee and the time of CGT event E5 will be the same.

There should be no capital gain or loss under CGT event E5 at the time the employee becomes presently entitled to the shares in company X, on the basis that there will be no change in market value.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).