Disclaimer
This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au

This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011568045388

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Exempt Benefits - FBT

Are benefits provided to the employee by the employer exempt benefits pursuant to section 57 of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period:

1 April 2009 - 31 March 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances

The employer is a tax concession charity.

It is recognised by its incorporation by Letters Patent from the government.

The employer has appointed a director (the employee) charged to assume a ministry development role to grow and enhance the ministry.

The employer has been involved in the specific activity in the state for many years and the ministry has a long pedigree, and continues to be viewed as a significant ministry of the employer .

Summary

Section 57 of the FBTAA requires four conditions to be met in order for the exemption from FBT to apply. With the information you have provided to us, it is sufficient to conclude that the benefits provided to the employee will be exempt benefits pursuant to section 57 of the FBTAA.

Detailed reasoning

Section 57 of the FBTAA states:

In considering whether this section applies to the benefits provided to the employee, it is necessary to consider whether the following requirements are satisfied:

Is the employer a religious institution?

There is no definition of 'religious institution' in the FBTAA. However, Taxation Ruling TR 92/17 Income tax and fringe benefits tax: exemptions for 'religious institutions', provides guidance as to what constitutes a religious institution.

Paragraphs 4 and 5 of TR 92/17 state:

In your case

A TCC is an entity that satisfies the TCC endorsement requirements as set out in section 50-110 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). To be endorsed as a TCC an entity must:

You have TCC endorsement as a religious institute and are the core of the religious order in your State. In addition, you are recognised by your incorporation by Letters Patent and your ministry is to practise, study, teach or propagate religious beliefs. Accordingly, you have satisfied the requirements of a religious institution for the purposes of section 57 of the FBTAA.

Is the employee a religious practitioner?

A 'religious practitioner' is defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 to mean:

While the expressions 'minister of religion' and 'member of a religious order' clearly include members of the clergy in the Christian denominations, they are also intended to include persons who hold equivalent positions in other religions.

In paragraph 13 of TR 92/17 it is stated that in determining whether a person is a minister of religion, many, if not all, of the following characteristics should be present:

In your case

We have already determined that you are a religious institution. Whether the employee in question is a participant in this religious institution in terms of the criteria listed above is discussed as follows:

The employee has been commissioned by you to fulfil a role that is primarily spiritual oversight of the ministry. Appointment at the denomination level for that type of role is by appointment by the Executive of the employer and is to a person who is so authorised to carry out the spiritual duties required of that position.

The appointment is to a spiritual leadership role in respect of the employer's staff that are engaged in the ministry, giving the employee authority in matters of doctrine or religious practice.

The primary purpose of the position is ministry enhancement and development. The employee has been instructed to develop a ministry plan for the Ministry and to implement it. The person is also required to be a participant on the Ministry Team. This indicates:

The employee has recognised authority in matters of doctrine and or religious practice and has been asked to extrapolate them to the ministry.

The expectation of implementation of the Ministry Plan indicates an acknowledged leadership in the spiritual affairs of the ministry.

The employee was chosen for this role on the basis of many years demonstrated religious training and ministry:

The position has implied authority to facilitate and participate in programs and events that are religious ceremonies and/or religious worship. The employer facilitates and hosts a large number of events on an annual basis. The position has a clear charter to maximise the fulfilment of the Great Commission within the context of the specific activities.

Based on all these facts collectively, we can determine that the employee is a religious practitioner.

Is the benefit provided to the employee, the employee's spouse, a child of the employee?

You have stated that the benefits are being provided to an employee, a member of your ministry staff.

Is the benefit provided principally in respect of pastoral duties, or any other duties or activities that are directly related to the practice, study, teaching or propagation of religious beliefs?

In the description you have provided we can determine that the duties the employee will be performing include pastoral duties and other activities associated with the practice, study, teaching or propagation of religious beliefs.

TR 97/17 states that religious practitioners who receive a stipend or other form of remuneration (including non-cash benefits) are employees for the purposes of the FBTAA. Consequently, if the requirements of section 57 of the FBTAA are satisfied, fringe benefits provided to a religious practitioner who is an employee of a religious institution are exempt benefits.

The exemption would cover such benefits as board and accommodation provided to a minister, his or her spouse and children, and a car used by the minister for pastoral duties.

The benefit need not be provided by the employer, so long as it is provided to the employee in his or her capacity as a minister and in respect of the pastoral or religious duties referred to in subsection 57(c) of the FBTAA.

Conclusion

Section 57 of the FBTAA requires four conditions to be met in order for the exemption from FBT to apply. With the information you have provided to us, it is sufficient to conclude that the benefits provided to the employee will be exempt benefits pursuant to section 57 of the FBTAA.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).