Disclaimer
This edited version will be removed from the Database after 30 September 2025. If you believe the issues detailed in this edited version warrant retention in an alternative form, email publicguidance@ato.gov.au

This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011569888789

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Whether holiday rental property activity is considered a business for non-commercial losses purposes

1. Does Division 35 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) apply if you purchase a holiday rental property?

No.

2. If you purchase a property and let it out (through a real estate agent) as holiday accommodation are you carrying on a business within the meaning of subsection 35-5(2) of the ITAA 1997?

No.

3. Can losses of a revenue nature, sustained from the purchase and letting of the holiday rental property be offset against your other assessable income?

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period

For the year ended 30 June 2011

For the year ended 30 June 2012

For the year ended 30 June 2013

For the year ended 30 June 2014

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2010

Relevant facts

You wish to purchase a property which is currently rented out as luxury holiday accommodation.

Bookings for the property are dealt with by a real estate agent who also arranges cleaning after guests have departed. The real estate agents charge a percentage plus GST, plus outgoings (such as for cleaners) for their services.

Rates for the holiday accommodation vary between $A to $B per two night weekend. Rates differ in peak seasons. Minimum booking times are also applicable during particular periods.

If you purchase the property, you wish to continue to rent out the property through a real estate agent as holiday accommodation. You propose to carry out minor maintenance work/tree planting yourself from time to time. You will not be conducting any other activities on the property.

You intend to borrow 100% of the purchase costs. You expect that the investment would sustain losses in the earlier years but that it would become profitable over time as the principal on the loan is paid off and income from rental thus starts to exceed the interest income.

You do not work in the real estate or holiday letting industry. You do not expect to pass the non-commercial losses income test ($250,000) while you remain working.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Section 8-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Section 35-5

Reasons for decision

Summary

The acquisition and letting out of the holiday rental property through a real estate agent would not be considered to be the carrying on of a business and therefore there would be no application of the non-commercial losses rules.

The revenue losses incurred in renting out this property will be able to be offset against your other income. If there is any private use of the property expenses would have to be apportioned.

Detailed reasoning

The general indicators of a business, as used by the Courts, are described in Taxation Ruling TR 97/11 Income tax: Am I carrying on a business of primary production?. The question of whether a business is being carried on is a question of fact and degree.

TR 97/11 is of general application. Its principles are not restricted to questions of whether a primary production business is being carried on.

In the Commissioner's view, the factors that are considered important in determining the question of business activity are:

Whether a business is being carried on depends on the large or general impression gained (Martin v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1953) 90 CLR 470; (1953) 10 ATD 226; (1953) 5 AITR 548) from looking at all the indicators of carrying on a business, and no one indicator will be decisive (Evans v. FC of T 89 ATC 4540; (1989) 20 ATR 922).

You are considering purchasing a holiday rental property. The property is advertised on a website with the contact person being a real estate agent. The real estate agent makes all arrangements regarding clients including bookings, cleaning and maintenance. There are no other activities organised on the property for clients. It is a self contained property. You propose to carry out minor maintenance work/tree planting from time to time.

There is no indication that you would be carrying on a business activity when applying the above factors. Based on the facts provided, you are making a passive investment in a holiday rental property. Because there is no business being carried on there is no application of the non-commercial losses legislation to this activity.

Losses incurred in letting out the holiday rental property are able to be offset against your other income to the extent that they are not of a capital or private nature.

If the property is available for rent on a permanent basis at commercial rates and there is no private use, the revenue type losses would be fully deductible. If there is private use, the Commissioner's views on apportionment of expenses are set out in Taxation Ruling IT 2167. This should be considered on an annual basis depending on the facts of the situation.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).