Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011590941806

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Foreign employment income

Is the salary you received while deployed to Country X exempt from income tax in Australia?

No.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ended 30 June 2010

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2009

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

You are an Australian resident for income tax purposes.

You are working on an Australian official development program in Country X.

You are employed for a period of not less than 91 days.

You are employed by an Australian resident consulting company.

The Commonwealth of Australia acting through Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) contracted the implementation of the program to a head contractor.

The head contractor subcontracted an activity relating to this program to your employer, the Australian resident consulting company.

You are employed by the consulting company to carry out services in relation to this activity under the subcontractor agreement between the consulting company and the head contractor.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 23AG.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 23AG(1).

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 23AG(1AA)(a).

Reasons for decision

While these reasons are not part of the private ruling, we provide them to help you to understand how we reached our decision.

Subsection 23AG(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) provides that where Australian resident individuals are engaged in foreign service for a continuous period of not less than 91 days, foreign earnings derived from that foreign service are exempt from tax in Australia.

However, new subsection 23AG(1AA) of the ITAA 1936, which took effect from 1 July 2009, provides those foreign earnings will not be exempt under section 23AG of the ITAA 1936 unless the continuous period of foreign service is directly attributable to, amongst other things, the delivery of Australian official development assistance by the person's employer (paragraph 23AG(1AA)(a)).

Delivery of Australian official development assistance by the person's employer

The term 'Australian official development assistance' is not defined for the purposes of section 23AG of the ITAA 1936. However, the Explanatory Memorandum (EM) which accompanied Tax Laws Amendment (2009 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2009 introducing subsection 23AG(1AA) of the ITAA 1936 provides guidance on the meaning of the phrase. The relevant paragraphs are below:

Australian official development assistance

1.19 Australian official development assistance (ODA) is assistance delivered through the Australian Government's overseas aid program, as administered by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and/or the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID). Australian ODA aims to reduce poverty and achieve sustainable development in developing countries, in line with Australia's national interest.

1.20 In addition to providing Australian ODA directly, AusAID also competitively contracts aid work to Australian and international entities. Thus, in practice, individuals involved in the delivery of Australian ODA can include both Australian Public Service (APS) employees and non-APS employees.

1.21 For the purposes of subsection 23AG(1AA) the delivery of Australian ODA must be undertaken by the person's employer, which includes AusAID and an entity contracted by AusAID to assist in the delivery of Australian ODA.

Example 1.1

Colin is an APS employee employed by AusAID. He is posted to the Cook Islands, for 120 continuous days, as a project advisor on an Australian ODA project aimed at improving the quality of early childhood education.

Colin's foreign service is directly attributable to the delivery of Australian ODA by his employer and his foreign earnings are therefore eligible for exemption pursuant to section 23AG, subject to the conditions contained in subsection 23AG(2).

Example 1.2

Robert is an APS employee employed by the Commonwealth Department of Climate Change. He is posted to Tokelau for 150 continuous days, to work on a project aimed at minimising the impacts of rising sea levels in Tokelau.

Robert is not an AusAID employee but the project is classified as Australian ODA by AusAID. Robert's foreign service is directly attributable to the delivery of Australian ODA by his employer and his foreign earnings are therefore eligible for exemption pursuant to section 23AG, subject to the conditions contained in subsection 23AG(2).

Example 1.3

Eli is a motor mechanic employed by Emu Engineering Pty Ltd, a private company contracted by AusAID to provide vocational training in Vanuatu. He is posted to Vanuatu for 180 continuous days.

Eli's foreign service is directly attributable to the delivery of Australian ODA by his employer and his foreign earnings are therefore eligible for exemption pursuant to section 23AG, subject to the conditions contained in subsection 23AG(2).

1.22 Foreign service directly attributable to the delivery of Australian ODA does not include diplomatic or consular duties carried out by Australian residents.

The EM and the examples in the EM reveal that paragraph 23AG(1AA)(a) of the ITAA 1936 is intended to restrict the section 23AG of the ITAA 1936 exemption to foreign earnings derived by:

· Australian Public Service (APS) employees providing assistance that is classified as Australian official development assistance and is delivered through the Australian Government's aid program which is administered by AusAID or the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), or

· other employees delivering Australian official development assistance on behalf of their employers who in turn have been contracted by the Australian Government to assist in the delivery of Australian official development assistance under the aid program that is administered by AusAID or DFAT.

Accordingly, for non-APS employees to be eligible for exemption pursuant to paragraph 23AG(1AA)(a) of the ITAA 1936, their employer must have been contracted directly by the Australian Government to assist in the delivery of Australian official development assistance under the overseas aid program that is administered by AusAID or DFAT. In your case, your employer has not been contracted directly by AusAID or the Australian Government to assist in the delivery of Australian official development assistance. Rather, your employer has been contracted by the head contractor under a separate subcontractor agreement.

Therefore, your foreign service was not directly attributable to the delivery of Australian official development assistance by your employer as you were engaged to carry out services in relation to the activity under the subcontractor agreement between your employer and the head contractor to provide services to AusAID. Consequently, the salary you derived while deployed in Country X is not exempt from income tax in Australia under subsection 23AG(1) of the ITAA 1936.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).