Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011619503046

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: work related expenses

Are you entitled to a deduction for the cost of your cosmetic surgery?

No.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 30 June 2010

Year ending 30 June 2011

Year ending 30 June 2012

Year ending 30 June 2013

Year ending 30 June 2014

The scheme commenced on:

1 July 2009

Relevant facts

You are a performing artist.

You have had cosmetic surgery performed to enhance your physical appearance.

You will require further surgery in the future to maintain the effects of the earlier surgery.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 25-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 40

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 40-30.

Reasons for decision

Summary

The surgery performed to enhance your physical appearance is considered to be private in nature. Therefore, you are not entitled to a deduction for the cost of your surgery.

Detailed reasoning

Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.

The courts have considered the meaning of 'incurred in gaining or producing assessable income'. In Ronpibon Tin N.L.Tongkah Compound N.L. v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 47; (1949) 8 ATD 431; (1949) 4 AITR 236 the High Court stated that:

Generally, medical expenses have no direct connection to the gaining or producing of assessable income. In the majority of cases, cosmetic surgery is performed to beautify or enhance a person's general appearance. There is insufficient connection to the gaining or production of assessable income for a deduction to be allowed as the expenditure is too remote.

In Case U83 87 ATC 481, orthodontic expenses incurred by a trombone player to correct a drift in teeth alignment were held to be of a private nature and not deductible. This was notwithstanding that the expense may be needed, necessary or even intended to assist in the derivation of income: refer Lunney v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 100 CLR 478; (1958) 11 ATD 404; (1958) 7 ATR 166.

Taxation Ruling TR 95/20 sets out deductions relating to employee performing artists. It states that a deduction is not allowable for the costs of maintaining general fitness or body shape.

In your case, although you believe the purpose of the surgery may help to improve your income earning activities, this does not change the private nature of the expenses incurred.

The cost of surgery is considered to be a private expense and not allowable under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.

Depreciating assets

Division 40 of the ITAA 1997 provides a deduction for the decline in value of depreciating assets based on their effective life.

A depreciating asset is defined in section 40-30 of the ITAA 1997 as an asset that has a limited effective life and can reasonably be expected to decline in value over the time it is used.

Depreciating assets include such items as computers, electric tools, furniture and motor vehicles.

The human body does not satisfy the definition of a depreciating asset. Therefore, you are not entitled to depreciate the cost of your surgery.

Repairs

Section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997 allows a deduction expenditure you incur for repairs to premises (or part of premises) or a depreciating asset that you held or used solely for the purpose of producing assessable income.

As stated above the human body is not considered to be a depreciating asset. Therefore, you are not entitled to a deduction for repairs under section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).