Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011647922673

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Non-commercial losses Commissioner's discretion

Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2009-10 income year?

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2009

Relevant facts

You satisfy subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997. That is, your income for non-commercial loss purposes is less than $250,000.

You recently migrated to Australia and on arrival commenced an academic coaching business.

Reasons for decision

Summary

The lead time discretion is intended to cover a business activity that has a lead time between the commencement of the activity and the production of any assessable income. For example, an activity involving the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income.

In the case of an academic coaching business, there is nothing inherent in the activity that requires a lead time before any assessable income can be earned. Therefore, the lead time discretion will not be exercised.

Detailed reasoning

Under paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997, the Commissioner's discretion can be exercised where the business activity satisfies these requirements.

for an applicant who carries on the business activity who satisfies subsection 35-10(2E) (income requirement) for the most recent income year ending before the application is made - the business activity has started to be carried on and, for the excluded years:

(i) because of its nature, it has not satisfied, or will not satisfy, one of the tests set out in section 35-30, 35-35, 35-40 or 35-45, and

(ii) there is an objective expectation, based on evidence from independent sources (where available) that, within a period that is commercially viable for the industry concerned, the activity will either meet one of those tests or will produce assessable income for an income year greater than the deductions attributable to it for that year (apart from the operation of subsections 35-10(2) and (2C)).

The note to paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 referred to the paragraph being intended to cover a business activity that has a lead time between the commencement of the activity and the production of any assessable income. It provides the example of the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income. 

Paragraph 17 of Taxation Ruling TR 2007/6 deals with the exercise of the Commissioner's discretion under this subparagraph and the meaning of 'because of its nature'.

For the failure to satisfy one of the four tests to be 'because of its nature', the failure must be because of some inherent characteristic that the taxpayer's business activity has in common with other business activities of that type (see Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Eskandari (2004) 134 FCR 569; 2004 ATC 4042; (2004) 54 ATR 695).

Paragraph 78 of TR 2007/6 states:

The consequences of business choices made by an individual (for example, the hours of operation, the size or scale of the activity, and the level of debt funding) are not inherent characteristics of a business activity and would not result in the requirements of subparagraph 35-55(1)(b)(i) being met.

The example at paragraph 139 of TR 2007/6 explains the taxpayer was new to the region and industry in which he chose to commence his business. He had no clientele. His funding and his advertising were limited, he kept his part time employment and he worked at his business when he could. He chose where his business premises were located and also his opening and closing times. He made losses each year and didn't satisfy any of the four tests.

The Commissioner's view on this example is found at paragraph 140 of TR 2007/6:

The inability of Andrew's business activity to satisfy any of the four tests is due to his personal business choices as to hours of business, location and advertising, not any inherent characteristics that affect clock repair businesses. Accordingly the requirement of subparagraph 35-55(1)(b)(i) is not met and the Commissioner would not exercise the discretion.

In your circumstances, the timing of the commencement of business and the required advertising of your business contributed to the losses incurred in the 2009-10 income year. Therefore, in reference to the above paragraphs, you have not shown that the lead time is an inherent characteristic of your industry.

The Commissioner will not exercise the discretion under paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997. You cannot claim a deduction for your losses against other income in the 2009-10 income year. Therefore, you must defer the loss to a future year where the loss can be claimed against a profit from your business activity.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).