Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011656575939

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fac sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Storm Financial collapse

Question and Answer

Is the negative equity repaid by the borrower component of the compensation payment that you received additional capital proceeds?

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 30 June 2009

Year ended 30 June 2010

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2008

Relevant facts and circumstances

You and your spouse were a client of Storm Financial Limited (Storm) and received financial advice from Storm.

On the advice of Storm and with Storm's assistance you and your spouse applied for a margin loan from the Commonwealth Bank of Australia's (CBA) Colonial Geared Investments division. The margin loan was approved by Colonial Geared Investments and the margin loan was advanced to you and your spouse. The margin loan was secured by various stocks and investments purchased with the proceeds of the margin loan. The security may have included units in a Storm branded index fund for which the responsible entity was the CBA or one of its related bodies corporate.

You and your spouse's investments with Storm were sold by the CBA or its related bodies corporate.

You and your spouse have, either directly or through your lawyers made a claim against the CBA for compensation concerning the circumstances of the margin loan and/or the security and repayment of indebtedness under the margin loan.

The parties have participated in a dispute resolution process known as the Storm Resolution Scheme (the scheme) on the terms set out in the Borrower Deed.

By participating in the scheme the parties agreed to:

In a letter the CBA provided details and a bank cheque for you and your spouse's entitlement under the settlement deed.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-25

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 104-25(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 108-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 116-20

Reasons for decision

The general CGT provisions are set out in Part 3-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). Under the CGT provisions a taxpayer will make a capital gain or loss only if a CGT event happens.

The negative equity repaid by the borrower component of the payment from the CBA forms part of the compensation payment that you received.

To determine if a CGT event happens in respect of a compensation payment it is necessary to consider the nature of the asset to which the compensation payment relates.

The Commissioner's policy on the treatment of compensation payments is set out in Taxation Ruling TR 95/35 (capital gains: treatment of compensation receipts).

TR 95/35 states that the particular asset for which compensation has been received by the taxpayer may be:

(TR 95/35 provides legislative references that relate to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936). The equivalent provisions in the ITAA 1997 are cited where appropriate.)

In determining which is the most relevant asset it is often appropriate to adopt a 'look through' approach to the transaction or arrangement which generates the compensation receipt.

In TR 95/35 the term 'underlying asset' is used. The underlying asset is defined in TR 95/35 as:

Taxation Ruling TR 97/3 also discusses compensation and deals with compensation received by landowners from public authorities. It explains at paragraph 2 that it extends the application of TR 95/35 and should be read in conjunction with that ruling.

Paragraphs 4 to 8 of TR 97/3 discuss the compensation received from a public authority for the compulsory acquisition of an easement and states that:

7. Paragraph 4 of TR 95/35 states that:

The ruling also considers a number of other circumstances when a landowner grants an easement on their land and in all but one instance the amount received is treated as consideration in respect of the part disposal of the land.

To the extent that the payment relates to the disposal of an underlying asset, CGT event A1 under section 104-10 of the ITAA 1997 happens.

This case:

You and your spouse were clients of Storm. You and your spouse applied and were granted a margin loan from the CBA's Colonial Geared Investments division. The margin loan was used to acquire various stocks and investments. It may have included units in a Storm branded index fund for which the responsible entity was the CBA or one of its related bodies such as Colonial First State.

Some time later the CBA determined that you and your spouse's historical current loan to security ratio had exceeded its historical margin call loan-to-security ratio. The CBA did not sell you and your spouse's investments until after it determined that you and your spouse's loan had exceeded its loan to security ratio.

The CBA with either you and your spouse or with your solicitors Slater & Gordon have made a claim against the CBA for compensation concerning the circumstances surrounding the margin call and/or the security and the repayment of indebtedness under the margin call. The CBA issued a letter to you and your spouse offering details of the proposal and settlement deed. The settlement deed agreed to pay you and your spouse compensation and interest.

On the facts of this case, it is considered that the compensation received had a direct and substantial link with the underlying asset (the investments). Accordingly, in line with the guidelines provided in paragraph 4 of TR 95/35 and TR 97/3 it is considered that the compensation amount was received as part of the underlying asset and it was not received for the disposal of any other asset, such as the right to seek compensation. The amount of compensation is therefore accepted as consideration received for the disposal of the underlying assets and CGT event A1 in section 104-10 of the ITAA 1997 occurred when you and your spouse's investments were sold.

Please note that because you have received additional capital proceeds in respect of previous CGT events this may mean you will need to adjust any capital gains or capital losses that you included in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 income years.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).