Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011675395997

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: GST and reverse charge provisions

Question 1

Will an Australian company (AusCo) be liable for GST under the reverse charge provision contained in Division 84 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) in relation to the recharge of legal and consulting costs incurred by a non-resident company (N/RCo) in connection with the acquisition of shares (including the funding arrangements) under a particular arrangement, as invoiced by N/RCo to AusCo on the date of invoice?

Answer

Yes. AusCo will be liable for GST under the reverse charge provision contained in Division 84 of the GST Act in relation to the recharge of legal and consulting costs incurred by N/RCo in connection with the acquisition shares (including the funding arrangements) under a particular arrangement, as invoiced by N/RCo to AusCo on the date of invoice.

Question 2

Will AusCo be liable for GST under the reverse charge provision contained in Division 84 of the GST Act in relation to any further charges of legal and consulting costs incurred by N/RCo in connection with the acquisition of the shares (including the funding arrangements) under a particular arrangement, and which are invoiced by N/RCo to AusCo post the date of invoice?

Answer

Yes. AusCo will be liable for GST under the reverse charge provision contained in Division 84 of the GST Act in relation to any further charges of legal and consulting costs incurred by N/RCo in connection with the acquisition of the shares (including the funding arrangements) under a particular arrangement, and which are invoiced by N/RCo to AusCo post the date of invoice.

Relevant facts and circumstances

N/RCo is a non-resident company whose operations are conducted from offices overseas and is not registered for Australian Goods and Services Tax (GST). N/RCo is not carrying on an enterprise in Australia.

N/RCo owned a percentage of the issued shares in another Australian company, AusCo2 (referred to as 'XX shares').

N/RCo had an agreement with AusCo2 where they offered to acquire, via a particular arrangement, the shares in AusCo2 that they did not already own (referred to as the 'ZZ shares'). The agreement provided that N/RCo could nominate one of their wholly owned subsidiaries to acquire the ZZ shares under the arrangement.

N/RCo nominated their Australian subsidiary company, AusCo, as the entity that would acquire the shares under the arrangement.

N/RCo advised that if the arrangement is approved, they intended to transfer their existing percentage interest in AusCo2 to AusCo. They agreed to provide AusCo with all amounts AusCo would require to pay for the acquisition of the ZZ shares pursuant to the arrangement. In aggregate, N/RCo would fund the consideration for the arrangement and all associated transaction costs. N/RCo would not fund any payments associated with the special dividend. Any such payments will be made by AusCo.

AusCo acquired the XX shares from N/RCo by entering into a share sale agreement with N/RCo.

AusCo acquired the ZZ shares from AusCo2 shareholders under the arrangement between N/RCo and AusCo2 and that not all of the ZZ shareholders are Australian residents for Australian income tax purposes.

Following the implementation of the arrangement, AusCo registered for GST from that day. AusCo afterwards became a member of the AusCo2 GST group and the group's nominated representative is AusCo3.

AusCo stated that N/RCo was the entity responsible for the proposal of the arrangement and the entity that entered into the agreement with AusCo2. Although N/RCo was able to nominate AusCo, N/RCo and AusCo asserted that N/RCo was in relation to the arrangement acting as principal, and not an agent of AusCo.

N/RCo incurred significant costs in relation to the acquisitions, including payment for legal advice and consulting services on the funding and transfer of the XX shares and also on the ZZ shares acquired under the arrangement (transaction costs). Any advice and consulting services provided to N/RCo were directed substantively to the acquisition of shares and the financing arrangements.

N/RCo and AusCo have not provided the letters of engagement with the relevant service providers, but have asserted that N/RCo was the party that entered into the engagement terms relating to the transactions with the service providers listed on the invoice(s) that is later issued by N/RCo to AusCo.

N/RCo invoiced AusCo the majority of the transaction costs they incurred on the basis that the costs relate to AusCo's acquisitions of shares in AusCo2. A copy of this invoice was provided. N/RCo intends to charge AusCo any further transaction costs they are invoiced for and that are related to AusCo's acquisitions of the shares in AusCo2.

N/RCo and AusCo have advised that the agreement was oral in relation to the on-charge of the transaction costs. Other than the invoice(s), there are no other written documentations.

The supplies on the invoice covered services made to N/RCo over a certain period and related to:

N/RCo has not charged any GST to AusCo in relation to the recovery of their transaction costs on the basis that any supply that might have been made by N/RCo is not connected with Australia.

AusCo provided further information as follows:

Reasons for decision

Division 84 of the GST Act

Division 84 of the GST Act is a special rule that deals with supplies of things other than goods or real property that are made outside Australia to a recipient in Australia. The GST on a supply that is a taxable supply under this division is reverse charged to the recipient of the supply.

Under section 84-5 of the GST Act, a supply may be treated as a taxable supply as follows.

Accordingly, where the requirements in subsection 84-5(1) of the GST Act are satisfied, a supply of things other than goods or real property that is made outside Australia to a recipient in Australia is a taxable supply and the recipient will be liable for GST on that supply.

Characterisation of the supply that is neither goods nor real property

The invoice issued by N/RCo to AusCo indicates that N/RCo has on-charged the costs for services it acquired from third parties which relate to either or all of the acquisition, valuation, structuring and financing in relation to the arrangement to AusCo. Whilst these costs may have a nexus to the arrangement, they are nevertheless inextricably linked to the takeover of AusCo2 by way of share acquisitions made by AusCo. These services were acquired by AusCo to enable them to structure their business and to purchase the shares in AusCo2. This is supported by AusCo's statement made in its letter which states:

Accordingly, we consider there was a separate supply of the services made by N/RCo (N/RCo's services) which was distinct from the supplies of the shares in AusCo or the lending of money by N/RCo to AusCo. This supply of services is not a supply of goods or real property and therefore the first limb of subsection 84-5(1) of the GST Act is satisfied.

Other Requirements of Section 84-5 of the GST Act

Paragraphs 84-5(1)(a) or 84-5(1)(b) of the GST Act - Connected with Australia

For paragraphs 84-5(1)(a) or 84-5(1)(b) of the GST Act to apply, the supply must not be connected with Australia or be connected with Australia because of paragraph 9-25(5)(c) of the GST Act respectively.

Under subsection 9-25(5) of the GST Act:

A supply of anything other than goods or *real property is connected with Australia if:

Paragraph 84-5(1)(a) of the GST Act is satisfied as the supply of the services made by N/RCo was not connected with Australia because:

As paragraph 84-5(1)(a) of the GST Act is satisfied, there is no need to consider paragraph 84-5(1)(b) of the GST Act.

Paragraph 84-5(1)(c) of the GST Act - Creditable purpose

Paragraph 84-5(1)(c) of the GST Act will be satisfied where the services are acquired by the recipient of the supply solely or partly for the purpose of an enterprise that the recipient carries on in Australia, but not solely for a creditable purpose.

Under subsection 11-15(1) of the GST Act a thing is acquired for a creditable purpose to the extent that it is acquired in carrying on an enterprise. However, subsection 11-15(2) of the GST Act provides a qualification, which states that, to the extent that an acquisition relates to making supplies that would be input taxed (such as financial supplies) or of a private or domestic nature that acquisition is not for a creditable purpose.

As AusCo acquired the N/RCo's services in carrying on its enterprise and is not of a private nature, the services are therefore acquired by AusCo as the recipient of the supply solely for the purpose of an enterprise that it carries on in Australia.

However, for the purposes of meeting the creditable purpose test, it must also be determined if these acquisitions made by AusCo relate to its making of supplies that would be input taxed.

Do these acquisitions relate to making supplies that would be input taxed?

As N/RCo's services were inextricably linked to AusCo's acquisition of shares (from N/RCo and ZZ shareholders) the acquisition of these services will prima facie be in relation to making an input taxed financial supply. This is because, as outlined in our Ruling, shares fall within the definition of a security which is a financial interest under item 10 in the table in subregulation 40-5.09(3) of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Regulations 1999 (GST Regulations) and will become a financial supply that is input taxed provided the conditions in subregulation 40-5.09(1) of the GST Regulations are met. We are satisfied that AusCo has fulfilled the requirements set out in subregulation 40-5.09(1) of the GST Regulations for making financial supplies when AusCo made the respective acquisition-supplies of shares to both N/RCo and the ZZ shareholders.

In the context of AusCo's financial supplies made in relation to the acquisition of shares from both N/RCo and ZZ shareholders, we have to determine whether they are all input taxed or GST-free supply. This is because under subsection 9-30(3) of the GST Act, to the extent that a supply would be both GST-free and input taxed, the supply is GST-free and not input taxed.

ZZ Shareholders' residency status

In the light of AusCo's advice, not all of the ZZ shareholders are Australian residents for Australian income tax purposes. Therefore, we need to address the situations where acquisition-supplies made by AusCo are to the ZZ shareholders who are residents of Australia and those who are non-residents respectively.

Acquisition-supply made by AusCo to the ZZ Shareholders who are residents of Australia

The acquisition-supply of the ZZ shares that AusCo made to the ZZ shareholders who are residents of Australia is an input taxed supply under subregulation 40-5.09(1) of the GST Regulations and section 40-5 of the GST Act. There is no provision under the GST Act that will make this acquisition-supply GST-free.

Acquisition-supply made by AusCo to the ZZ Shareholders who are non-residents of Australia

In accordance with subsection 9-30(3) of the GST Act, the acquisition-supply of the ZZ shares made by AusCo to ZZ shareholders who are non-residents is an input taxed supply to the extent that it is not GST-free.

Under item 2 in the table in subsection 38-190(1) of the GST Act

2

Supply to *non-resident outside Australia

a supply that is made to a *non-resident who is not in Australia when the thing supplied is done, and:

(a) the supply is neither a supply of work physically performed on goods situated in Australia when the work is done nor a supply directly connected with *real property situated in Australia; or

(b) the *non-resident acquires the thing in *carrying on the non-resident's *enterprise, but is not *registered or *required to be registered.

The acquisition-supply made by AusCo to ZZ shareholders who are non-residents of Australia will be GST-free under item 2(a) because:

There are no provisions under section 38-190 of the GST Act which exclude the acquisition-supply by AusCo to ZZ shareholders who are non-residents of Australia from being GST-free.

Acquisition-supply made by AusCo to N/RCo

As N/RCo is a non-resident, the analysis under subsections 9-30(3) and 38-190(1) of the GST Act above, would be applicable. Accordingly, the acquisition-supply made by AusCo to N/RCo will be GST-free under item 2(a) because:

There are no provisions under section 38-190 of the GST Act which exclude the acquisition-supply by AusCo to N/RCo from being GST-free.

The acquisitions from N/RCo are in relation to the supplies AusCo makes. That is, AusCo makes both input taxed and GST-free supplies when making acquisition-supplies of shares to N/RCo and ZZ shareholders. Therefore, the acquisitions from N/RCo are not solely for a creditable purpose. Accordingly, paragraph 84-5(1) (c) of the GST Act is satisfied.

Paragraph 84-5(1)(d) of the GST Act - Consideration

N/RCo has invoiced AusCo for the N/RCo's services and AusCo is required to provide consideration to N/RCo for these services. Hence, paragraph 84-5(1)(d) of the GST Act is satisfied.

Paragraph 84-5(1)(e) of the GST Act - GST registration

Paragraph 84-5(1)(e) of the GST Act requires that the recipient (in this circumstance, AusCo) is registered or required to be registered for GST. Further, subsection 84-5(2) of the GST Act requires a recipient who is not registered for GST to take into account the value of all taxable supplies that are deemed by virtue of subsection 84-5(1) of the GST Act, in calculating its GST turnover.

In determining if an entity is required to be registered for the purposes of paragraph 84-5(1)(e) of the GST Act, it should take into account the value of supplies made under subsection 84-5(1) of the GST Act when calculating its GST turnover. AusCo's turnover (including the Division 84 supplies) is greater than $75,000 and therefore, it satisfies the registration turnover threshold of $75,000 stipulated in Regulation 23-15.01 of the GST Regulations. Accordingly, it must register for GST and consequently paragraph 84-5(1)(e) of the GST Act is satisfied.

Is the supply of N/RCo's services GST-free or input taxed?

The supply of the N/RCo's services provided and invoiced by N/RCo to AusCo is not GST-free or input taxed under the GST Act. Therefore, the exclusion set out at the end of subsection 84-5(1) of the GST Act does not apply in the circumstances.

Summary


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).