Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011679774274

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: GST and time limits on refunds

Issue 1

Question 1

Does section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA) apply to restrict Entity A's (You) entitlement to a refund?

Advice/Answers

Yes, section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA applies to deny your entitlement to a refund.

Issue 2

Question 1

Does section 105-65 of Schedule 1 to the TAA apply to restrict your entitlement to a refund?

Advice/Answers

As section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA applies to deny your entitlement to a refund, there is no need to address this question.

Relevant facts

You have been registered for GST since 1 July 2000.

You report for GST on a monthly basis.

You have in the past always been in a refund situation.

You are currently implementing a new finance system to incorporate certain controlled entities in your GST group and as a result of the transition to the new system, your data has undergone extensive analysis and reconciliation activity.

This process has identified an overpayment in the activity statement for a tax period outside the four year time limit. This resulted in a one-off overstatement of G1 (total sales, income and other supplies) which is not attributable to particular supplies nor the incorrect GST classification of any transactions. This resulted in an error in the calculation of the net amount for the tax period outside the four year time limit.

The overstated amount was not connected with any taxable or non-taxable supplies for the tax period outside the four year time limit (or any other period).

Reasons for decision

Issue 1

Question 1

Section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA states:

As a result of the amendments to sections 105-50 and 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA, effective from 1 July 2008, the four year time limit on GST refunds and credits applies irrespective of whether the refund results from a reduction in an entity's liability or an increase in the amount of the refund.

You contend that section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA does not apply in this case because:

Net amount

Miscellaneous Taxation Ruling MT 2010/1 deals with restrictions on GST refunds under section 105-65 of Schedule 1 to the TAA. It is relevant to consider paragraphs 38, 150, 151 and 153 of MT 2010/1.

Paragraph 38 states:

From the above paragraph it is clear that the supplier is the entity that determines whether a supply is taxable. This may happen where the supplier:

§ treats a GST free-supply as taxable

§ treats an input taxed supply as taxable

§ treats a non taxable supply as taxable

§ mistakenly reports GST on GST-free or input tax supplies

§ makes an error in calculation

§ incorrectly reports supplies, GST or ITC in their AS that should not be reported.

When the GST on those amounts is reported in an AS by the supplier for the relevant tax periods as taxable supplies, those amounts are included in and form part of the net amount under section 17-5 of the GST Act for that tax period. However, the net amount is not ascertained only in accordance with the provisions of the GST Act but also takes into account other statutory provisions which affect the amount payable or refundable including sections 105-50, 105-55 and 105-65 of Schedule 1 to the TAA. Paragraphs 150 and 151 of MT 2010/1 state:

Therefore, the net amount calculated under section 17-5 of the GST Act is also affected by the time limit imposed by section 105-55, irrespective of whether supplies were incorrectly treated as taxable. The Explanatory Memorandum (EM) in relation to Tax laws Amendment (2008 Measures No.3) Bill 2008 provides the following example.

In the above example, the additional GST of $5,000 that Mark Enterprises included in its June 2008 AS (and which is part of its net amount), does not relate to any particular supply for that period or any other period and based on your contention this overstated amount which was included in the AS by mistake should not represent a 'net amount'.

However, example 2.5 in the EM suggests otherwise by stating that Mark Enterprises is not entitled to a refund because it failed to notify the Commissioner of its entitlement within the four year period.

In Australian Leisure Marine Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation [2010] AATA 620; (2010) 76 ATR 390; 2010 ATC 10-148 at paragraphs 16 and 17 Senior Member, Dr P McDermott states:

As a result of the decision in the KAP Motors case (where it was held that the consideration was not paid in relation a supply), taxpayers who did not lodge a notification of entitlement before 30 June 2008, were limited to four years under the new amendments to section 105-55 of Schedule to the TAA effective from 1 July 2008. For those who lodged their notifications before 30 June 2008, they could claim the full entitlement for the periods within four years covered by the notification. For periods outside four years their claim was limited to the amount payable in the relevant tax periods. However, they could not claim a refund if a tax period was in a refund situation.

The relevant paragraphs from the Decision Impact Statement (DIS) in relation to the KAP Motors case are quoted below and provide the ATO view on restrictions on refunds outside four years regarding the matters raised in that case.

GST

100,000

less ITC

50,000

Net amount

50,000 (you paid to the Commissioner)

GST

100,000

less ITC

150,000

Net amount

(50,000) (the Commissioner paid a refund to you)

GST

100,000

less ITC

50,000

Net amount

50,000 (you paid to the Commissioner)

The fact that in the tax period outside the four year time limit you treated as a taxable supply something that you contend was not connected with any taxable or non-taxable supply, does not prevent section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA from applying and denying your entitlement to that refund. The above paragraphs from the DIS, in particular example 2, are relevant to your case.

Your contention that the overstated amount in the tax period outside the four year time limit never formed part of the net amount and did not represent a 'net amount' for the purposes of paragraph 105-55(2)(a) of Schedule 1 to the TAA and section 17-5 of the GST Act is not accepted by the ATO. The question of whether supplies that an entity treats as taxable supplies were in fact supplies or no supplies is not relevant to the restriction in section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA where refund claims are made more than four years after the end of the relevant tax period. Section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA does not depend for its operation on whether there is a supply.

If in a tax period outside the four year time limit you treat supplies that are not taxable (or are not supplies) as taxable, they are included in the net amount under section 17-5 of the GST Act for that period. Section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA extinguishes the right of a taxpayer to notify the Commissioner after the four year time limit has expired. Paragraph 153 of MT 2010/1 states:

In relation to the attributions rules in Division 29 of the GST Act, those rules apply because the supply was treated as taxable as explained above.

Payment

Subsection 105-55(2) of Schedule 1 to the TAA states:

As supplies that were not taxable (or were not supplies) were treated as taxable supplies, they were taken into account in working out your net amount for the tax period outside the four year time limit as per subsection 17-5(1) of the GST Act, and section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA applies to deny a refund. There is no need to separately address this contention.

Issue 2

Question 1

As section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA applies to deny your entitlement to a refund, there is no need to address this question.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).