Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011682576117

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Cap and Pipe the Bores government grant

Question 1

Is the government grant payment (the grant) to the taxpayer ordinary income of the taxpayer under section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Advice/Answers

No.

Question 2

Is the grant to be made to the taxpayer, statutory income as an assessable bounty or subsidy under section 15-10 of ITAA 1997?

Advice/Answers

No.

Question 3

Is the grant statutory income of the taxpayer as an assessable recoupment under subdivision 20-A of ITAA 1997?

Advice/Answers

No.

Question 4

Does CGT event C2 happen to the taxpayer in relation to component A of the grant?

Advice/Answers

Yes, however as the payment is a reimbursement of your expenses under a scheme established by an Australian government agency, paragraph 118-37(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997 applies to disregard any capital gain or loss arising from the receipt of the reimbursement.

Question 5

Does CGT event C1 happen to the taxpayer in relation to component A of the grant?

Advice/Answers

Yes, CGT event C1 may happen, however there are no capital proceeds in relation to this event.

Question 6

Does CGT event C2 happen to the taxpayer in relation to component B of the grant?

Advice/Answers

Yes.

Question 7

Does CGT event H2 happen to the taxpayer in relation to component B?

Advice/Answers

No.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ending 30 June 2011

Year ending 30 June 2012

Year ending 30 June 2013

The scheme commences on:

Not yet commenced.

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

The grant is payable as a partial reimbursement of the cost of work completed.

The grant has two components:

Question 1 - Whether income according to ordinary concepts?

Under subsection 6-5(1) of the ITAA 1997, a payment or other benefit received by a taxpayer is included in assessable income if it is income according to ordinary concepts. Income according to ordinary concepts is not defined in the income tax legislation. However, principles to determine whether a receipt is income according to ordinary concepts have been developed by case law. In determining whether a receipt is income according to ordinary concepts, it is necessary to apply the relevant principles developed by case law to the facts of the particular case.

In Scott v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1966) 117 CLR 514 Windeyer J stated:

In GP International Pipecoaters Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 170 CLR 124; 90 ATC 4413; (1990) 21 ATR 1 the High Court stated at CLR 138, ATR 7; ATC 4420:

The nature of the grant and its relationship to the business activities of the taxpayer indicates that the grant is capital in nature.

The amount of the grant is therefore not considered to be income according to ordinary concepts.

Question 2 - Whether an assessable bounty or subsidy?

Section 15-10 of the ITAA 1997 includes in assessable income a bounty or subsidy that is received in relation to carrying on a business and that is otherwise not assessable as ordinary income. The basic tests contained in section 15-10 of the ITAA 1997 are that an amount is assessable income if it is:

The taxpayer is not considered to be carrying on a business, as such the amount of the grant is not assessable to the taxpayer pursuant to section 15-10 of the ITAA 1997.

Question 3 - Whether an assessable recoupment?

The assessable recoupment provisions in subdivision 20-A of the ITAA 1997 need to be considered where a payment is to be received as recoupment of a loss or outgoing.

Taxation Ruling TR 2006/3 in considering the application of subdivision 20-A provides the following at paragraphs 137 and 138:

The grant provided to the taxpayer has two components:

We will address the application of Subdivision 20A to each component separately.

Component A

Component A of the grant is not income according to ordinary concepts and not otherwise assessable, see questions 1, 2, 4 and 5. However, the loss or outgoing incurred is not a deductible loss or outgoing covered by the list in section 20-30 of the ITAA 1997.

As such component A of the grant is not an assessable recoupment pursuant to subdivision 20-A of the ITAA 1997.

Component B

Component B whilst not income according to ordinary concepts is assessable as a capital gain, see question 6.

As such component B of the grant is not an assessable recoupment pursuant to subdivision 20-A of the ITAA 1997.

Question 4 - Whether CGT event C2 happens in relation to component A?

Component A of the grant is a reimbursement of a percentage of the costs incurred by the taxpayer.

Entry into the agreement gives the taxpayer the legal right to receive Component A of the grant. This right is a CGT asset under paragraph 108-5(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997.

Section 104-25 of ITAA 1997 provides the following:

SECTION 104-25  Cancellation, surrender and similar endings: CGT event C2  

 

104-25(3)  

 

It is considered that Component A of the grant is the capital proceeds for a CGT event C2 that happens when the taxpayer's right to receive that amount is satisfied.

Paragraph 118-37(2)(a) of ITAA 1997 provides the following:

   

As the payment is a reimbursement of your expenses under a scheme established by an Australian government agency, paragraph 118-37(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997 applies to disregard any capital gain or loss arising from the receipt of the reimbursement.

Question 5 - Whether CGT event C1 happens in relation to component A?

Section 104-20 of ITAA 1997 provides the following:

CGT event C1 may happen in relation to component A, however there are no capital proceeds in relation to this event

Question 6 - Whether CGT event C2 happens in relation to component B?

Entry into the agreement also gives the taxpayer a legal right to receive Component B of the grant. This right is a CGT asset under paragraph 108-5(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997.

Section 104-25 of ITAA 1997 provides the following:

104-25(3)  

 

It is considered that CGT event C2 under section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997 happens when the right under the agreement is satisfied by payment of Component B of the grant to the taxpayer.

Paragraph 118-37(2)(a) of ITAA 1997 provides the following:

   

Component B of the grant represents a reimbursement of a percentage of costs incurred. However, the costs are incurred by the associated company and not by the taxpayer. Paragraph 118-37(2)(a) of ITAA 1997 does not apply to disregard any capital gain or loss arising because the costs are not incurred by the taxpayer.

Question 7 - Whether CGT event H2 happens in relation to component B?

CGT event H2 can only happen if no other CGT event happens (subsection 102-25(3) of ITAA 1997). As CGT event C2 happens in this situation, no CGT event H2 happens.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).