Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011711329477
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: non-commercial loss Commissioner's discretion
Question
Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your primary production activity in your calculation of taxable income for the relevant income years?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2010
Year ended 30 June 2011
The scheme commenced on
1 December 2007
Relevant facts
You earned more than $250,000 in the relevant income year.
Previously you and your partner purchased a property with finance. In the bushfires all stock were killed, all fences, sheds and the shearing facility were destroyed. Nothing was insured.
You are currently raising capital from other investments in order to pay down the debt, which will reduce the cash flow burden current debt levels have on the business.
You are re-stocking with the intention to build the flock. Information obtained by the ATO from your industry shows a return after 20 months (lead time) is expected from this type of farming.
Your intention was to conduct this farming full time but the fire has delayed this by several years.
You expected that your farming activity would show a profit recently. The bushfires put the profitability of the activity back several years.
Detailed reasoning
You have not satisfied the income requirement as your relevant income has exceeded $250,000. Therefore the loss from your activity will not be taken into account in the relevant years unless the Commissioner will exercise his discretion in section 35-55 of the ITAA 1997.
To apply the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997, the Commissioner should be satisfied that the business activity is affected in the relevant year by the special circumstances.
It is considered that the bush fire was outside your control and therefore it is accepted as a special circumstance as this term is used in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997.
Your farming activity, commenced some time ago was destroyed by the bushfires and as a result you had to re-stock your flock and replace your infrastructure to recommence your business. As a consequence your assessable income for the relevant income year was vastly reduced in comparison to the the previous income year.
Due to the bushfire your normal running expenses in the income year increased by $116,888 in comparison to previously.
It is reasonable to expect that had the bushfire not killed your flock in the relevant income year your sales in the later income year would have been at least equal to or greater than the sales of the relevant income year.
The difference between what may have been the sales figure for recent and the increase in normal running costs may not have existed had the bushfire not destroyed your flock and therefore, had the bushfire not occurred, it is reasonable to conclude that you may have produced a profit in the recent income year. The Commissioner is satisfied that your farming activity would have made a profit in the relevant year had it not been affected by the bushfire.
Paragraph 51 of Taxation Ruling TR 2007/6 discusses where the lead time of a business activity may be extended due to the occurrence of special circumstances and therefore allow the Commissioner to exercise the discretion under paragraph 35-55(1)(a). Example 11 at paragraph 154 of TR 2007/6 discusses lead time of a red fruit business being extended due to special circumstances of a bush fire occurring during the original lead time period. The discretion of paragraph 35-55(1)(a) was applied in this example.
In your case your industry expects a return of 20 months therefore the ATO considers that the lead time for the relevant farming is two years. As the bushfire occurred within the lead time of your farming activity the Commissioner will extend the discretion of paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA to include the relevant income year.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).