Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011729603424
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: Self-education Travel Expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for travel expenses to and from work if it is also your place of education?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2011
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2010
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are enrolled in an apprenticeship.
All study and training is done at work.
You do not undertake any formal study - it is all practical with some self paced paperwork to complete.
You have to pay to fly from your home to city A which is interstate. Your employer pays for you to fly to and from your place of work from city A. You then have to pay to fly home from city A.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature.
Lunney v. Commissioner of Taxation [1958] ALR 225; 1958 0311H HCA; 100 CLR 478; (1958) 11 ATD 404; (1958) 32 ALJR 139 (Lunneys case) introduced what is now regarded as the essential character test. This test requires that for an expense to be deductible, it must have the essential character of a business or income producing expense. The taxpayer in this case sought to deduct the cost of travelling from his home to his work. The expenses were disallowed as being private and domestic, establishing the broad principle that costs incurred because of living in one place while working in another cannot be regarded as deductible. The reasons given by the High Court were twofold.
The fact that certain expenditure, such as travelling to work, must be incurred in order to be able to derive assessable income, does not necessarily mean that the expenditure is incidental and relevant to the derivation of assessable income or that it is incurred in the course of gaining or producing assessable income. It is a prerequisite to the earning of assessable income rather than being incurred in the course of gaining that income.
The essential character of the travel to and from work is that of a private and domestic nature, related to personal and living expenses as part of the taxpayers choice of where to live, in choosing to live away from and what distance from work.
There are exceptions where travel between home and work are deductible, for example where you transport bulky tools and equipment, your home is a base of employment and you commence your duties prior to leaving home, or you regularly work at more than one site each day before returning home.
The general principles established in Lunneys case have been followed in many subsequent cases and would hold equally for the travel expenses in your case. That is, the travel expenses are a prerequisite to the earning of your income and are not expenditure incurred in the course of gaining or producing income. Your circumstances do not meet any of the exceptions which would allow your travel expenses to be deductible.
The travel expenses you have incurred are not considered to be as a result of your income earning activities. The expenses are incurred by you in putting yourself in a position where you can perform your duties, rather than in the performance of your duties. Therefore you are not entitled to deduction for the travel expenses you incur.
Self-education expenses
TR 98/9 discusses the circumstances under which self-education expenses are allowable as a deduction. A deduction is allowable for self-education expenses if a taxpayer's current income earning activities are based on the exercise of a skill or some specific knowledge and the subject of the self-education enables the taxpayer to maintain or improve that skill or knowledge (Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Finn (1961) 106 CLR 60, (1961) 12 ATD 348).
Similarly, if the study of a subject of self-education objectively leads to, or is likely to lead to, an increase in a taxpayer's income from his or her current income earning activities, a deduction is allowable.
Travel expenses
TR 98/9 provides that, subject to the general tests under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 being met, travel expenses to and from an educational institution may be deductible.
An educational institution is, as stated in Paragraph 134 of TR 98/9, an institution or organisation, or a dedicated part of it, whose primary function is to provide systematic instruction, teaching or schooling in a subject, skill or competency. This view is supported by the decision of the No 2 Board of Review in Case M11 80 ATC 78; 23 CTBR (NS) Case 97. There, L C Voumard (Member) relied on Barry v. Hughes [1973] 1 All ER 537, where it was said that an educational establishment was one whose primary function was that of education.
The study you undertake whilst completing your apprenticeship is done at your place of employment, which does not meet the criteria above to be classed as an educational institution. Whilst we acknowledge your specific circumstances, your travel expenses are not sufficiently connected to your income earning activities and furthermore are regarded as private in nature. Therefore you are not entitled to claim the airfares to and from city A as a self-education expense.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).