Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011739640426

Ruling

Subject: Share Capital Account Tainting

Question 1

Are amounts debited to the Share-based Payments Reserve part of the 'share capital account' of the company (the Applicant) within the meaning of section 975-300 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer: No

Question 2

At the time of a credit to the Applicant's share capital account, is there a 'transfer' of an amount or amounts to the Applicant's share capital account from another account within the meaning of subsection 197-5(1) of the ITAA 1997?

Answer: Yes

Question 3(a)

Are amounts credited under the Option Plan to the Applicant's Share-based Payments Reserve 'option premiums' that are excluded from the operation of the share capital account tainting rules pursuant to section 197-25 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer: Yes

Question 3(b)

Are amounts credited under the Share Acquisition Plan (SAP) to the Applicant's Share-based Payments Reserve 'option premiums' that are excluded from the operation of the share capital account tainting rules pursuant to section 197-25 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer: No

Question 4

If there were transfers associated with these transactions, were those transfers in respect of amounts that, at all times, could be identified as 'share capital' pursuant to section 197-10 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer: No

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Applicant is a resident Australian public company.

The Applicant operates a number of employee share schemes for its employees. The two plans of relevance to this Application are the Option Plan and the SAP.

Option Plan

Options granted under the Option Plan carry no dividend or voting rights and are granted to eligible employees. No consideration is payable by employees for the grant of the options, other than services provided by employees. An eligible employee may only exercise the option if they are entitled to do so in accordance with the terms and condition of the Option Plan.

Entitlements to the options are vested as soon as they become exercisable.

The fair value of the options is measured at grant date and recognised as an expense over the period during which the employee becomes unconditionally entitled to the options and the following journal entry is recorded accordingly:

Upon the exercise of the options, the amounts received from employees in respect of the exercise price of the options are debited to the Receivable / Cash account and credited to the Share Capital Account. Simultaneously, to recognise the reclassification of the fair value of the options upon exercise, the Applicant debited its Share-based Payments Reserve and credited its Share Capital Account.

Where options lapse or are not exercised the options' value is not reclassified to share capital.

It is this final journal entry (i.e. the debiting of the Share-based Payments Reserve and crediting of the Share Capital Account) which is the subject of this Ruling.

Amounts of the Option Plan share option value were reclassified from the Applicant's Share-based Payments Reserve to its Share Capital Account after 30 June 2006.

SAP

The SAP Plan Rules (the Plan Rules) provide that:

When the shares are issued to the Participant, the following two journal entries are posted.

The first entry recognises the fair value of the issued share which is funded by the Share Plan Loan. The second entry recognises the "option" in the loan arrangement, being the Participant's ability to repay the Share Plan Loan in full and have the relevant shares fully vested in their name, free of any Holding Lock or lien on and over the shares.

The value of this embedded "option" is determined by the Applicant based upon the Black-Scholes valuation model.

Upon repayment of the Share Plan Loan, the following journal entries are recorded to reflect this repayment by the Participant and to reclassify the embedded "option" from Share-based Payment Reserve to Share Capital.

It is this final journal entry (i.e. the debiting of the Share-based Payments Reserve and crediting of the Share capital Account) which is the subject of this Ruling.

The Share-based Payments Reserve is the only reserve account maintained by the Applicant.

Only those amounts credited to the Applicant's Share Capital Account from 30 June 2006 are relevant to the potential application of Division 197 of the ITAA 1997.

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

The amounts debited to the Share-based Payments Reserve are not part of the 'share capital account' of the Applicant within the meaning of section 975-300 of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

'Share capital account' for the purposes of Division 197 of the ITAA 1997 is defined in subsection 975-300(1) as:

The share capital account represents a liability owed to the shareholders by the company and appears with other liability accounts on the liabilities side of a balance sheet in traditional accounting: it is not to be confused with an asset account. The accounts to which Division 197 of the ITAA 1997 refers are not asset accounts. A 'negative' asset account, however, is a liability account and vice versa.

'Share capital' is not defined for the purposes of Division 197. It is therefore necessary to consider the ordinary meaning of the term 'share capital'.

The concept of share capital was considered in the High Court case of Archibald Howie Proprietary Ltd & Ors v. Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) (1948) 77 CLR 143 where Williams J stated, at 157:

The Full Court of the Federal Court in St George Bank Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 176 FCR 424; [2009] FCAFC 62; 2009 ATC 20-103; (2009) 73 ATR 148 considered share capital as follows, per Perram J at paragraph 90:

As stated above, in respect of the Option Plan, upon exercise of the options in order to recognise the reclassification of the fair value of the options upon exercise, the Applicant debited its Share-based Payments Reserve and credited its Share Capital Account. Similarly, under the SAP, upon repayment of the Share Plan Loan, the Applicant also debited its Share-based Payments Reserve and credited its Share Capital Account.

In respect of the Option Plan, the amounts entered in the reserve account represent the fair value of the option, not the consideration received for the issue of shares.

Likewise, in respect of the SAP the amounts entered in the reserve account do not represent consideration received for the issue of shares, rather the amounts represent the value of the embedded "option" in the Share Plan Loan. That is, the additional amount of services recognised by the Applicant's entries in its Share-based Payments Reserve does not constitute payment for the shares, but rather, payment for the limited recourse facility on the loan.

Consequently, amounts debited to the Share-based Payments Reserve are not part of the 'share capital account' of the Applicant.

Question 2

Summary

At the time of a credit to the Applicant's Share Capital Account, there is a 'transfer' of an amount to the Applicant's Share Capital Account from another account within the meaning of subsection 197-5(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

Division 197 of the ITAA 1997 provides for a company's share capital account to become 'tainted' if an amount is transferred to the share capital account from another account.

Subsection 197-5(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides:

The purpose of Division 197 is to prevent profit being distributed as share capital. This is consistent with the purpose of the share capital tainting rules explained in paragraph 4.4 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Taxation Laws Amendment (2006 Measures No 3) Bill 2006 (the EM) which states:

The purpose of Division 197 is therefore to prevent the transfer of profit to share capital, and subsequently prevent the tax preferred distribution of capital out of what is actually profit.

In the present case, the amounts in the Share-based Payments Reserve are amounts that were originally debited to the profit and loss account and represented the fair value of option that the employees had under the Option Plan to acquire shares and the "option" the employees had under the SAP in respect of the Share Plan Loan. They are amounts that do not represent the consideration for the issue of shares, but are amounts of profit that are credited to the Applicant's Share Capital Account.

Therefore, to the extent that amounts were credited to the Applicant's Share Capital Account from 30 June 2006, at the time of the credit there is a 'transfer' of that amount to the Applicant's Share Capital Account within the meaning of subsection 197-5(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Question 3(a)

Summary

Amounts credited under the Option Plan to the Applicant's Share-based Payments Reserve are 'option premiums' that are excluded from the operation of the share capital account tainting rules pursuant to section 197-25 of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

Section 197-25 of the ITAA 1997 provides that Division 197 does not apply to the transferred amounts if:

Additionally, ATO Interpretative Decision ATOID 2009/87 provides that:

A share-based payments reserve may be viewed as an option premium reserve account by another name. The Share-based Payments Reserve of the Applicant is used only to record the fair value of the option on grant of the options under the Option Pan (and the value of the "option" embedded in the Share Plan Loan at grant under the SAP). Consequently, the Applicant's Share-based Payments Reserve constitutes an option premium reserve for the purposes of paragraph 197-25(a) of the ITAA 1997.

The transfer from this 'option premium reserve' to the Applicant's Share Capital Account happens when participants exercise their option under the Option Plan to acquire shares in the Applicant (paragraph 197-25(b) of the ITAA 1997). Additionally, the services provided by the employees to the Applicant represent premiums in respect of those options, for the purposes of paragraph 197-25(c) of the ITAA 1997, as the fair value of the option recognised at grant time represents consideration provided by employees for the contractual right to acquire shares in the Applicant.

As such, the transferred amounts under the Option Plan are, by virtue of section 197-25 of the ITAA 1997, excluded from the operation of Division 197 of the ITAA 1997.

Question 3(b)

Summary

Amounts credited under the SAP to the Applicant's Share-based Payments Reserve are not 'option premiums' that are excluded from the operation of the share capital account tainting rules pursuant to section 197-25 of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

Based on the explanation in respect of section 197-25 of the ITAA 1997 as outlined above at Question 3(a), paragraphs 197-25(a) and 197-25(c) of the ITAA 1997 are satisfied in respect of the SAP, however paragraph 197-25(b) of the ITAA 1997 is not.

As stated above, paragraph 197-25(b) of the ITAA 1997 requires that the transfer is because of the exercise of options to acquire shares in the company.

In respect of the "option" embedded in the Share Plan Loan, the transfer to the Applicant's Share Capital Account following repayment of the Share Plan Loan is not a consequence of the exercise of an option to acquire shares in the Applicant, as the shares have already been acquired by a Participant prior to any option being exercised. Rather, it is a consequence of the exercise of an option to repay the loan and deal with the shares free of any encumbrances. Under the Plan Rules, the shares are already legally and beneficially owned by the participants prior to the embedded "option" being exercised and therefore an exercise of the "option" would only result in the Applicant removing the Holding Lock and lien on and over the shares.

The fact that the arrangement is accounted for as an option to acquire shares does not affect the legal form of the arrangement. The Participant pays full value for the share, using the Share Plan Loan. Therefore (as stated above) the additional amount of services recognised by the Applicant's entries in its Share-based Payments Reserve does not constitute payment for the shares, but rather, payment for the limited recourse facility of the loan.

While the Applicant's accounting treatment of the Share Plan Loan is equivalent to the accounting treatment of an option to acquire shares, paragraph 197-25(b) of the ITAA 1997 requires that the transfer is because of the actual exercise of an option to acquire shares in a company, and not merely as a result of accounting for an arrangement (with a different legal form) as an option.

As such, section 197-25 of the ITAA 1997 does not apply to exclude the amounts credited to the Applicant's share capital account after 30 June 2006 in respect of the SAP after 30 June 2006 from the operation of Division 197 of the ITAA 1997.

Question 4

Summary

No transfers associated with these transactions, could at all times, be identified as 'share capital' pursuant to section 197-10 of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

Section 197-10 of the ITAA 1997 provides that Division 197 does not apply "to the transferred amount if it could, at all times before the transfer, be identified in the books of the company as an amount of share capital." This means that the amount that is transferred to the share capital account needs to be identified.

Whether the transferred amount was identifiable in the books of the account as share capital is to be assessed at the time the transfer occurs, rather than the time at which shares were issued.

In respect of both the Option Plan and the SAP, before the relevant amounts were transferred, they were in the Share-Based Payments Reserve of the Applicant. As explained in answering Question 1 above, the amounts in the Applicant's Share-based Payments Reserve do not constitute 'share capital'. Consequently, the transferred amounts could not at all times be identified as 'share capital'. As such, the exclusion in section 197-10 of the ITAA 1997 does not apply.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).