Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011758009052

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Fringe benefits tax: Remote area housing benefits - loan interest and rent

This ruling applies to

The taxpayer

Issue 1

Remote Area Housing Benefits

Question 1

Is the taxable value of an expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment by the taxpayer of employee 1 and 2's mortgage loan interest for residential accommodation in the Area, under the terms of a valid salary sacrifice arrangement, reduced under subsection 60(2) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986?

Advice/Answers

Yes.

Question 2

Is the taxable value of an expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment by the taxpayer of employee 3's rental payments for residential accommodation in the Area, under the terms of a valid salary sacrifice arrangement, reduced under subsection 60(2A) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986?

Advice/Answers

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 31 March 2010

Year ended 31 March 2011

Year ended 31 March 2012

The scheme commenced on

1 April 2009.

Relevant facts

Assumptions

None.

Relevant legislative provisions

Reasons for decision

Issue 1

Question 1

Is the taxable value of an expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment by taxpayer of employee 1 and 2's mortgage loan interest for residential accommodation in the Area, under the terms of a valid salary sacrifice arrangement, reduced under subsection 60(2) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986?

Summary

The payment by the taxpayer for the housing loan interest of employee 1 and 2 will constitute remote area housing loan interest as all the necessary requirements under subsection 142(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) have been met.

The taxable value of the expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment of the housing loan interest of employee 1 and 2, by the taxpayer, will qualify for reductions in taxable value under subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA as all the necessary conditions have been met.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA provides for a 50% reduction of taxable value of expense payment fringe benefits in respect of remote area housing loan interest payments where all the following conditions set out in subsection 60(2) are met:

60(2)(a) Expense payment fringe benefit in respect of employee's housing loan

In basic terms, an expense payment benefit, under section 20 of the FBTAA, is either where an employer reimburses an employee for expenses incurred by the employee or where an employer pays a third party in satisfaction of expenses incurred by an employee. Also, in basic terms, a fringe benefit, as defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA, is a benefit provided to an employee by an employer in respect of the employee's employment and such benefit is not otherwise exempted.

This condition is met as the taxpayer proposes to pay the residential housing loan interest of employee 1 and 2 under the terms of a valid salary sacrifice arrangement.

60(2)(b) Recipients expenditure for interest for remote area housing loan for a dwelling

Subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA defines a 'dwelling' as meaning a unit of accommodation constituted by, or contained in a building, being a unit that consists, in whole or in substantial part, of residential accommodation.

The taxpayer proposes to pay the interest expenditure for the residential housing loan incurred by employee 1 and 2.

Subsection 142(1) of the FBTAA, in basic terms, sets out the requirements for a 'remote area housing loan' as being a housing loan that also meets all of the following requirements:

142(1)  [Remote area housing loan]  

The common conditions in 142(2E) of the FBTAA are as follows:

142(1)(a)(i) Dwelling in remote area as employee's usual place of residence

Practice Statement PS LA 2000/6 provides a list of cities and towns within Australia that are considered to be remote areas. The Area in question is listed as a remote area.

The relevant dwelling is in a remote area as it will be located in the Area.

The dwelling is the usual place of residence for employee 1 and 2.

Hence, this condition is met.

142(1)(a)(ii) Current employee is usually employed not in, nor near, an eligible urban area

PS LA 2000/6 provides a list of cities and towns within Australia that are considered to be remote areas. The Area is listed as a remote area.

The taxpayer has confirmed that employee 1 and 2's primary place of employment is at the Area.

This condition is satisfied.

142(1)(b) The common conditions in subsection 142(2E) of the FBTAA are met

The taxpayer advises that a number of taxpayers in similar situations offer remote area housing benefits to their employees, and believes it is customary for taxpayers in similar situations to provide free or subsidised residential accommodation to employees in remote locations to attract staff.

It is accepted that, especially in remote areas, it is customary for employers to provide housing assistance, as defined, to their current employees.

It is considered, therefore, that the 'common conditions' are met in this case.

60(2)(c) The dwelling is the employee's usual place of residence during the period the interest accrued

The taxpayer confirmed that employee 1 and 2 will use the dwelling as his/her usual place of residence during the occupation period which the interest accrued.

This condition is met.

60(2)(d) The housing loan is entered into under bona-fide circumstances

It is noted that the loan agreement is entered into at an arm's length between all parties. The reimbursement provided under the arrangement is not entered into for the purpose of gaining the benefit or concession of section 60 of the FBTAA.

This condition is satisfied.

Conclusion

The payment by the taxpayer for the housing loan interest of employee 1 and 2 will constitute remote area housing loan interest as all the necessary requirements under subsection 142(1) of the FBTAA have been met.

The taxable value of the expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment of the housing loan interest of employee 1 and 2, by the taxpayer, will qualify for reductions in taxable value under subsection 60(2) of the FBTAA as all the necessary conditions have been met.

Question 2

Is the taxable value of an expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment by the taxpayer of employee 3's rental payments for residential accommodation in the Area, under the terms of a valid salary sacrifice arrangement, reduced under subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA?

Summary

The payment by the taxpayer for the rent of employee 3 will constitute remote area housing rent connected with a unit of accommodation as all the necessary requirements under subsection 142(1A) of the FBTAA have been met.

The taxable value of the expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment of the rent of employee 3, by the taxpayer, will qualify for reductions in taxable value under subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA as all the necessary conditions have been met.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA provides for a 50% reduction of taxable value of the expense payment fringe benefits in respect of remote area housing rental payments where all the following conditions set out in subsection 60(2A) are met:

60(2A)  [Recipient of remote area housing rent]  

60(2A)(a) Expense payment fringe benefit in respect of employee's housing rent

In basic terms, an expense payment benefit, under section 20 of the FBTAA, is either where an employer reimburses an employee for expenses incurred by the employee or where an employer pays a third party in satisfaction of expenses incurred by an employee. Also, in basic terms, a fringe benefit as a benefit, as defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA, is a benefit provided to an employee by an employer in respect of the employee's employment and such benefit is not otherwise exempted.

This condition is met as the taxpayer proposes to pay the rental payments of employee 3 under the terms of valid salary sacrifice arrangement.

60(2A)(b) Recipients expenditure for remote area housing rent for a unit of accommodation

Subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA defines a 'unit of accommodation' to include accommodation in a house, flat or home unit.

The taxpayer proposes to pay the rental payments incurred by employee 3 in connection with a unit of accommodation.

Subsection 142(1A) of the FBTAA, in basic terms, sets out the requirements for a 'remote area housing rent connected with a unit of accommodation' as being rental payments that also meets all of the following requirements:

The common conditions in subsection 142(2E) of the FBTAA are as follows:

142(2E)  [Common conditions]  

142(1A)(a)(i) Unit of accommodation in remote area as employee's usual place of residence

Practice Statement PS LA 2000/6 provides a list of cities and towns within Australia that are considered to be remote areas. The Area is listed as a remote area.

It is considered that the relevant unit of accommodation will be in a remote area as it will be located in the Area.

The unit of accommodation is the usual place of residence for employee 3.

Hence, this condition is met.

142(1A)(a)(ii) Current employee is usually employed not in, nor near, an eligible urban area

PS LA 2000/6 provides a list of cities and towns within Australia that are considered to be remote areas. The Area is listed as a remote area.

The taxpayer has confirmed that employee 3's primary place of employment is at the Area.

This condition is satisfied.

142(1A)(b) The common conditions as set out in subsection 142(2E) of the FBTAA are met

The taxpayer advises that a number of taxpayers in similar situations offer remote area housing benefits to their employees, and believes it is customary for taxpayers in similar situations to provide free or subsidised residential accommodation to employees in remote locations to attract staff.

It is accepted that, especially in remote areas, it is customary for employers to provide housing assistance, as defined, to their current employees.

It is considered, therefore, that the 'common conditions' are met in this case.

60(2A)(c) The unit of accommodation is the employee's usual place of residence during the period of rental payments

The taxpayer confirmed that employee 3 will use the unit of accommodation as his/her usual place of residence during the occupation period which the rental payment accrues.

This condition is met.

60(2A)(d) The rental agreement is entered into under bona-fide circumstances

It is noted that the rental agreement is entered into at an arm's length between all parties. The reimbursement provided under the arrangement is not entered into for the purpose of gaining the benefit or concession of section 60 of the FBTAA.

This condition is satisfied.

Conclusion

The payment by the taxpayer for the rent of employee 3 will constitute remote area housing rent connected with a unit of accommodation as all the necessary requirements under subsection 142(1A) of the FBTAA have been met.

The taxable value of the expense payment fringe benefit resulting from the payment of the rent of employee 3, by the taxpayer, will qualify for reductions in taxable value under subsection 60(2A) of the FBTAA as all the necessary conditions have been met.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).