Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011759713288

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: NCL- Special circumstances

Question

Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your non-primary production activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2009-10 income year?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2010

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2009

Relevant facts

You have stated that you commenced a business during 2009. This ruling has been provided on the basis that you were in business.

You rented a room with a separate company.

You paid the company a commission to operate the equipment during work hours and you operated it on week days and weekends for specified hours.

The company ceased to operate in 2010 and due to the prohibitive cost of relocating and the economic conditions, you decided to discontinue your business.

You did not advertise your business or seek an alternative place to locate the equipment.

Your income in the 2009-10 financial year was less than $XXX and expenses were more than $XXX.

Your income in the 2010-11 financial year was more than your expenses.

You did not meet any of the tests listed in section 35-10 of ITAA 1997 and nor did your activity fall within the exception category.

Your adjusted taxable income was less than $250,000.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subparagraph 35-55(1)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 35-10

Reasons for decision

Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial business loss from a business activity carried on by a taxpayer who is an individual unless:

Under the measures the losses that cannot be offset against other income in the year in which they arise may be carried forward to be offset in a future year when there is a profit from the non-commercial activity (or against other income if certain criteria are satisfied or the Commissioner exercises his discretion).

The discretion in section 35-55 of the ITAA 1997 may be exercised for the income year in question where the business activity is affected by special circumstances outside of the control of the operators of the business activity. Such circumstances are specifically defined to include, but are not limited to, drought, flood, bushfire or some other natural disaster.

Taxation Ruling TR 2007/6 is about the Commissioner's discretion. It states the discretion is not intended to apply where a business activity makes a loss because of factors which can apply to any business and which do not affect the ability of the activity to satisfy one of the four tests. Rather, the discretion is intended to be available for a commercial business activity that has failed, or objectively is expected to fail for a period of time, to satisfy any of the tests for certain reasons outside the control of the operator. Paragraph 139 of Taxation Ruling TR 2007/6 provides the following example:

The inability of Andrew's business activity to satisfy any of the four tests is due to his personal business choices as to hours of business, location and advertising, not any inherent characteristics that affect clock repair businesses. Accordingly the requirement of subparagraph 35-55(1)(b)(i) is not met and the Commissioner would not exercise the discretion.

In your case, you commenced an activity in 2009 and you did not meet any of the four tests listed in section 35-10 of the ITAA 1997 in the 2009-10 financial year. Your failure to meet the assessable income test was not due to special circumstances outside of your control, such as a natural disaster. Whilst we accept that the closing of the company was out of your control, this did not affect your business in the 2009-10 financial year. Additionally, the exception does not apply to you as your activity is not considered to fall within the definition of a primary production or professional arts business.

Based on the information you provided, your situation is not of the kind for which section 35-55 of the ITAA 1997 was enacted.

To conclude, the tax legislation does not permit the Commissioner to exercise his discretion for the 2009-10 financial year in your case.

Your loss will be deferred until a future year where one of the tests is satisfied or the Commissioner grants a discretion.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).