Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011772952138

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: GST and apportionment

Question

Is the apportionment methodology set out in steps 1 to 11 fair and reasonable for calculating the amount of input tax credits Entity A is entitled to for its acquisitions for the purposes of Division 11 and 15 of the A New Tax System (Goods And Services Tax) Act 1999 (the GST Act)?

Answer

The Commissioner confirms that the apportionment methodology set out in steps 1 to 11 is fair and reasonable for calculating the amount of input tax credits Entity A is entitled to for its acquisitions for the purposes of Division 11 and 15 of the GST Act.

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

Entity A is registered for GST and its principal activities are raising capital from the public and investment in Australian and overseas infrastructure and related assets.

Entity A's assets currently include investments in Australia and overseas.

Entity A pays performance and base management fees to Entity B as consideration for the supply of its services as a manager. Largely, these fees are paid in respect of investment management and asset enhancement activities. Entity B provides the service of operating Entity A and carrying out the duties set out in Entity A's management agreement with Entity B. This includes:

Methodology

References to Entity A are references to the GST group of which Entity A is the representative member.

Where Entity A exceeds the financial acquisitions threshold, the methodology to be used by Entity A to determine the amounts of input tax credits on acquisitions made for a creditable purpose is as follows:

For the purposes of the above, securities issued, disposed of or redeemed are to be treated as GST-free where the address of the holder recorded on the security (or other) register of Entity A, is a place outside Australia. However, if it is known, or ought reasonably to be known that the security holder has sufficient connection with Australia, further enquiries will be made to determine if the supplies are GST-free under section 38-190 of the GST Act.

For the purpose of the above:

You will determine that part of the manager services relating to the making of what would be or are particular supplies from time to time consisting of the issue, disposal or redemption of Securities by applying the following ratio:

On 2X March 20XX you confirmed that employees are employed by entities in the Group and some are made available through formalised secondment arrangements. However, not all employees work for another entity. At X April 20XX, the number of employees working predominately on Investor Relations, Corporate Communications and/or Compliance & Risk was XX and the number of other employees was XXX which gave a ratio of 8.57%.

12. You will determine the input tax credit entitlement on acquisitions referred to in step 10 by applying the extent of creditable purpose in step 10 to the total GST paid on these acquisitions.

To the extent that any input tax credits are not for a creditable purpose, you will consider any entitlements to reduced input tax credits under Regulation 70 of the GST regulations.

On XX March 20XX you also advised us that the group manages other funds and that employees that are included in the numerator 'A' work on other entities. You also provided us with the following practical example:

The April quarterly management fee of $X (inclusive of GST of $X) is used to apportion on the following basis.

At X April 20XX, using the A/B ratio of XX/XXX (employees) results in 8.57% of the management fee applying to issues of securities and the remaining 91.43% are for services not in relation to the issuing of securities.

The 8.57% is further split into foreign ownership of 35.74% and domestic ownership 64.26%.

The proportion of the GST on the management fee relating to investor relations, compliance, etc would be calculated as: XX/XXX x $XXX,000 = $XX,XXX.XX.

The amount of GST would then be recovered with reference to the unitholders and therefore full recovery of GST for the non-resident unitholder related component of $6,126.01 (35.74% of $17,142.86) and a Reduced Input Taxed Credit (RITC) in respect of $11,016.85 (64.26% of $17,142.86) recovered for the resident unitholder related component. Note that input tax credits are claimed on the remaining portion of GST that is not relating to the issue of shares of $182,857.14 under step 10 of the methodology.

Reasons for Decision

Under section 11-20 of the GST Act, an entity is entitled to an input tax credit for any creditable acquisition that it makes.

An entity makes a creditable acquisition under section 11-5 of the GST Act when that entity:

Subsection 11-15(1) of the GST Act provides that you acquire a thing for a creditable purpose to the extent that you acquire it in carrying on your enterprise. Under subsection 11-15(2) of the GST Act however, you do not acquire the thing for a creditable purpose to the extent that:

Accordingly, to the extent that acquisitions made by Entity A relate to making supplies that would be input taxed, they are not acquired for a creditable purpose. Therefore, such acquisitions are not, to that extent, creditable acquisitions and Entity A is not entitled to input tax credits. The exceptions to subsection 11-15(2) of the GST Act outlined in subsections (4) or (5) of the GST Act have been taken into consideration in the methodology. The exception in subsection 11-15(3) of the GST Act are not relevant for present purposes.

Section 11-25 of the GST Act provides that the amount of input tax credit is equal to the GST payable on the supply of the thing acquired (unless the acquisition made is partly creditable).

Entity A makes GST-free and input taxed supplies. It has provided us with an apportionment methodology that consists of direct and indirect methods for acquisitions made by it in order to separate such acquisitions that are used either wholly for a creditable purpose or a non-creditable purpose. A major acquisition it makes from the manager, namely the services outlined as 'management services', relates to GST-free and input taxed supplies and thus prima facie has a partly creditable purpose as provided for in section 11-30 of the GST Act.

Acquisitions that are partly creditable are defined in subsection 11-30(3) of the GST Act to mean 'the extent to which the creditable acquisition is for a creditable purpose, expressed as a percentage of the total purpose of the acquisition.' Consequently, an apportionment of these acquisitions is necessary to determine the extent of creditable purpose.

Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2006/3: Goods and Services Tax: determining the extent of creditable purpose for providers of financial supplies (GSTR 2006/3) outlines the Commissioner's views on apportionment and the methods of calculating the extent of creditable purpose of an entity's acquisitions or importations.

Paragraphs 33 and 73 of GSTR 2006/3 make it clear that the method chosen to allocate or apportion acquisitions between creditable and non-creditable purpose needs to:

Methods of calculating the extent of creditable purpose are discussed in paragraphs 80 and 81 of GSTR 2006/3:

Therefore, the apportionment method adopted must be fair and reasonable in the circumstances of entity A's enterprise and must appropriately reflect the intended or actual use of its acquisitions or importations.

You provided us with a flow chart depicting an actual example of how this method works. Based on the information provided, including this example, we are of the opinion that the apportionment methodology submitted provides a fair and reasonable basis for calculating the extent of creditable purpose for acquisitions of entity A under Division 11 of the GST Act.

The methodology is considered to be fair and reasonable in the circumstances applying at the time of issuing this ruling. If those circumstances should change you may be required to review this methodology to determine if it remains fair and reasonable.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).