Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011773753957

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Income Tax Exemption - Encouragement of a game or sport

A sporting club which has been established for the encouragement of a game or sport and which is not carried on for the purposes of profit or gain to its individual members is exempt from income tax in accordance with paragraph (c) of item 9.1 of the table in section 50-45 of the ITAA 1997 subject to the special condition under section 50-70 of the ITAA 1997 which states that:

We consider that the Club has a physical presence in Australia and incurs its expenditure and pursues its objectives in Australia.

In accordance with Taxation Ruling TR 97/22, for a club to be exempt from income tax under section 50-45 of the ITAA 1997, it needs to satisfy three tests:

Where a club does not satisfy all three requirements, it is not exempt from income tax under section 50-45 of the ITAA 1997. However, in calculating its assessable income it is subject to the mutuality principle. Broadly, this means that member receipts (which include members' subscriptions and trading income relating to members) are not included in the clubs assessable income for tax purposes: see Taxation Determination TD 93/194 in relation to subparagraph 23(g)(iii) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 which is equivalent to section 50-45 of the ITAA 1997.

Test 1 It cannot be carried on for profit or gain to individual members

Section 50-45 of the ITAA 1997 requires that the club is not carried on for the purposes of profit or gain of its individual members. Where members, in their individual capacity, are to receive benefits from the club, the club would not satisfy this test.

Benefits received by members communally as members, for example the use of the club facilities, where these benefits are incidental to the pursuit of the clubs objects, do not prevent the club from satisfying this requirement, nor does the payment of reasonable remuneration to members for services they provide to the club.

Relevant clauses of the Constitution strongly indicate the intention of the Club to comply with the non-profit requirement. Nothing in the Club's activities indicate that the non-profit requirement is not adhered to.

It is accepted, based on the constituent documents, objects and activities, that members are not in receipt of benefits individually and that the club satisfies this requirement.

Test 2 encouragement of sport

Encouragement is not defined in the ITAA 1997. TR 97/22 re-states the Macquarie Dictionary meaning: stimulation by assistance. Paragraph 11 of TR 97/22 then provides a number of examples of what activities are contemplated as constituting direct and indirect encouragement.

The club has advised:

Test 3 that encouragement must be the club's main purpose

In order to determine the tax status it is necessary to determine the main purpose of the entity by reference to its objects and activities in the relevant year. In St Mary's Rugby League Club v. FCT 97 ATC 4528; 36 ATR 281 (St Marys case) Hill J stated:

The question is thus one which goes to the character and nature of the applicant. That a question of characterisation is to be determined having regard to the objects, purposes and activities of the taxpayer.

In Cronulla-Sutherland Leagues Club Ltd v. FC of T 90 ATC 4215 at 4225; (1991) 21 ATR 300, Lockhart J in the Full Federal Court said:

The Club's objects, set out above, are clearly supportive of a sporting purpose and this purpose is reflected in its activities.

The sporting activities of the Club are significant in terms of money and staff, including volunteers. Surpluses generated by the Club's non-sporting activities subsidise the losses from the Club's sporting activities which consistently run at a loss of $X. Without this direct financial assistance, the sporting activities of the Club would not be able to be sustained.

The operation of the club's motel generates additional income which the Club is able to use in furtherance of its activities. It supports the sporting activities directly by enabling the Club to accommodate people attending competitions run by the Club. In St Marys's Rugby League Club Limited V FC of T 97 ATC 4528Hill J stated in relation to the possible use of surplus funds to build a motel:

Hill J did not say that the operation of a motel would lead to a conclusion that St Mary's was not operating for the encouragement of sport, only that it may of itself weaken the case in support of the encouragement of sport. This might be the case where the motel operated for purposes other than the encouragement of sport. The club has advised that a certain percentage of the short-term accommodation complex's patrons stay there for club sporting events. Rooms are block booked for these and only released for other visitors when sporting numbers are confirmed.

The Club, to a lesser extent, is involved in a variety of other sports in addition to their main sport. A certain percentage of the total area of the Club premises is used for sport.

Of the Club's members who attend each year, approximately X percent attend the club for sporting purposes.

The club has advised that voting members are mostly sports people. Voting members vote at general meetings and can vote on changes to the constitution. Only voting members can be nominated to the Board.

Approximately six percent of overall expenses are directly related to sports activities. However, much of the non-sport expenses are incurred in generating the funds that ultimately support the sporting activities. This would be consistent with the decision in the FC of T v Word Investments Ltd 2008 ATC 20-072.

The Club's recreational facilities both in design and function are meant to enhance the sporting activities of the Club. The Club recreational facilities adjoin the sporting facilities and the décor is also designed to enhance the sporting activities of the club.

Quote from Grand United Port Macquarie West-Bowling Club & FCT:

The facts in St Marys Rugby League Club Limited v. FC of T 97 ATC 4528 bear marked similarities to the facts in relation to this matter in that both Clubs operate significant recreational facilities, undertake significant sporting activities, and have a high number of management and voting members who were active or had been active in sport in one form or another.

The constitution, activities, history and control point to the characterisation of the Club as one having its main object or purpose to that of promoting the relevant sport. The objects record the significance of the specific sport as the major object of the Club. Control of the Club effectively vests with members. The membership structure gives emphasis to voting members the majority of whom are the relevant sport's supporters. The activities of the Club involve both social and sporting activities. Although income is derived from the social activities and the sporting activities constitute an outgoing, there is an intensity of activity directed towards sport. The history of the Club is one of close association with its specified sport from its inception and again points to the correct characterisation as being one for ``the encouragement or promotion'' of a game or sport.

The combination of these factors leads us to the conclusion that the Club satisfies the requirements for exemption from income tax under item 9.1 (c) of s50-45.

Note that as the club is considering expansion it will need to review its status in future years.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).