Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private ruling
Authorisation Number: 1011779582250
This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fac sheet has more information.
Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.
Ruling
Subject: non-commercial losses
Question
Does the income from your old partnership cause you to fail the income requirement under subsection 35-10(2E) of the Income Tax Assessment Act (ITAA 1997)?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 2010
Year ended 30 June 2011
Year ended 30 June 2012
The scheme commenced on
1 July 2009
Relevant facts and circumstances
This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.
You were partners in a partnership on a farm that has been held in the family for many years. You left the partnership to carry on your own business on a section of the farm. A new partnership has been created comprising parent, child and family trust.
The change in the partnership resulted in a profit (in excess of $250,000 for each partner) from the old partnership and a loss for the following period in the new partnership.
The profit from the old partnership resulted from the same type of farming activity, farming exactly the same land and using the same equipment as the subsequent loss in the same year in the new partnership.
Reduced income is expected for the year ended due to severe drought conditions in the region.
Reasons for decision
Summary
It is considered that your old partnership and new partnership activities are of a similar kind. This means they can be combined together resulting in an overall profit from the grouped activity. As an overall profit has been achieved, the non-commercial loss provisions of the legislation do not apply.
Therefore you are able to offset the loss attributable to your new partnership activity against your other income from the old partnership.
Detailed reasoning
Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 applies to losses from certain business activities for the year ended 30 June 2001 and subsequent years. The provisions only apply to individuals who conduct a business activity as either a sole trader or a partner in a partnership and made a loss from that business activity.
From 1 July 2009 where a taxpayer's taxable income for non-commercial loss purposes exceeds $250,000 their activity must meet certain additional requirements before a loss from the activity can be offset against the taxpayer's other income.
Taxation Ruling TR 2001/14 discusses the Commissioner's view of the non-commercial business loss provisions of the taxation legislation.
In Allied Mills Industries Pty Ltd v. FC of T 88 ATC 4852 it was acknowledged that a taxpayer might carry on several distinct businesses.
A single business may consist of several separate business activities. Where there are separate business activities, each business activity must individually meet the requirements of Division 35 of the ITAA 1997.
Paragraph 45 of TR 2001/14 provides a list of factors which may be considered in determining if separate business activities are being carried on. The factors include:
· the type of activities being carried on
· the location the activities are carried out
· the types of assets used
· the types of goods and services produced and related market conditions
· interdependency between the activities
· commercial links between the activities.
Where a taxpayer's activities are viewed as separate businesses, subsection 35-10(3) of ITAA 1997 allows the activities to be grouped together as a single activity if they are of a similar kind.
What will be a business activity 'of a similar kind' to another business activity will be a question of fact and degree. The question involves a comparison of the relevant characteristics of each activity.
Application to your circumstances
You were a partner in a partnership which operated a farm.
You formed a new partnership creating a separate farm on a section of the land.
The new partnership carries out the same farming activities as the old partnership.
The same assets are used on the farm.
As the business activities are of a similar kind, they can be grouped together. Thus, your income from the grouped activities is calculated as the income from the old partnership plus the loss from the new partnership.
As there is an overall profit from your grouped activities, the non-commercial loss provisions of the income tax legislation do not apply.
Therefore, the loss attributable to the new partnership may be offset against the income from the old partnership.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).