Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011816317413

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Genuine redundancy - employment after termination

Question:

Answer:

This ruling applies for the following period

The scheme commenced on

Relevant facts and circumstances

Relevant legislative provisions

Reasons for decision

Summary

Detailed reasoning

Genuine redundancy payment

A payment made to an employee, after 30 June 2007, is a genuine redundancy payment if it satisfies all the criteria set out in section 83-175 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). This section states:

Section 82-135 of the ITAA 1997 lists payments that are not employment termination payments. Paragraph 82-135(e) provides that the part of a genuine redundancy payment worked out under section 83-170 is not an employment termination payment.

Based on the facts provided it is clear that:

The matter at issue is if you obtain employment with another company within the same employer group of companies, will that prevent the payment you will receive on termination of employment with your current employer from being concessionally treated as a genuine redundancy payment.

As noted above, paragraph 83-175(2)(c) of the ITAA 1997 provides that:

You are considering applying for a position with the potential new employer - a company within the Company Group. In applying for the position you will have to go through the normal recruitment process like any other job applicant. You further advise that there is no guarantee that you will be successful in your application.

It is clear from the foregoing that there is no arrangement between yourself and your current employer to employ you after the dismissal. Also, there is no evidence to suggest that there an arrangement between your current employer and the potential new employer to employ you after the dismissal.

In light of this it is considered that the requirement under paragraph 83-175(2)(c) of the ITAA 1997 has been satisfied.

The other requirements to be satisfied under section 83-175 of the ITAA 1997 are that:

From the information you have provided it appears that:

Section 82-135 of the ITAA 1997 lists payments that are not employment termination payments. These include (among others):

Accordingly, subsection 83-175(4) of the ITAA 1997 excludes the entire amount of the unused annual leave payment from being a genuine redundancy payment, because the payment is mentioned in section 82-135. Consequently, the unused annual leave payment is not a genuine redundancy payment in accordance with subsection 83-175(4).

This leaves the remaining amount as being a genuine redundancy payment under section 83-175 of the ITAA 1997. However, paragraph 82-135(e) specifically excludes the tax-free part of part of a genuine redundancy payment from being an employment termination payment.

Tax-free part of a genuine redundancy payment

Subsection 83-170(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that so much of the genuine redundancy payment that does not exceed the amount worked out using the formula prescribed in subsection 83-170(3) is not assessable income and is not exempt income. Any amount in excess of the tax-free amount is taxed as an employment termination payment. The formula for working out the tax-free amount is:

The payment worked out from the above formula is the tax-free amount of a genuine redundancy payment and is not required to be included in your income tax return for the 2011-12 income year.

After deducting the tax-free amount of a genuine redundancy payment the remaining amount of is considered to be an employment termination payment.

The employment termination payment will consist entirely of a taxable component which is included in your assessable income under subsection 82-10(2) of the ITAA 1997.

As you are under preservation age you will be entitled to a tax offset under paragraph 82-10(3)(b) of the ITAA 1997 that ensures that the rate of income tax on the amount up to the ETP cap amount will not exceed 30% plus Medicare levy. The amount in excess of the ETP cap amount will be subject to tax at the top marginal rate (45% plus Medicare levy).

Preservation age is the age at which retirees can access their superannuation benefits generally when they retire.

If you were born:

For the 2011-12 income year the ETP cap amount is $165,000.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).