Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011817043889

Ruling

Subject: Insurance payments

Question

Are the family support and major trauma payments made under the terms of an insurance policy assessable?

Answer: No.

Relevant facts

The arrangement that is the subject of the Ruling is described below. This description is based on the following documents. These documents form part of and are to be read with this description. The relevant documents are:

You have held a loss of income insurance policy for several years, and have been receiving payments under the terms of the policy.

The insurance provides disability benefits as well as other benefits.

The payments received by you under the policy include major trauma benefit and family support benefit. The family support benefit was paid for a total of three payments in as many months, triggered once your disability benefit payment commenced. The major trauma benefit is also payable periodically.

Reasons for decision

Major trauma payments

Subsection 6-5(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that the assessable income of an Australian resident includes ordinary income derived directly or indirectly from all sources during the income year.

Ordinary income has generally been held to include three categories, namely, income from rendering personal services, income from property and income from carrying on a business.

Other characteristics of income that have evolved from case law include receipts that:

The trauma payment is not earned by you as it does not directly relate to services performed. Rather the payment relates to personal circumstances that have arisen during your life and therefore, the trauma payments do not have the character of income. Although the payments can be said to be expected, and perhaps relied upon, this expectation arises from the investment in insurance, rather than from a relationship with personal services performed. That is the payment is not paid for employment, services rendered or income replacement.

The character of the receipt in the hands of the recipient is relevant. Lump sum personal injury and trauma payments are not generally assessable as ordinary income. In your case the payments are paid periodically. This factor alone does not change the character of the payment to one of an income nature. Where the trauma payment is not paid one-off, the amounts are considered as instalments of a capital lump sum. These amounts are of a capital nature. Thus, the payment is not considered ordinary income and is therefore not assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.

Family support benefit

You have received three payments of family support benefit. As stated under the terms of your insurance policy, this benefit is only payable:

The family support benefit is not earned by you as it does not directly relate to services performed. Rather the payment relates to personal circumstances that have arisen during your life and therefore, the family support payments do not have the character of ordinary income. The question of whether or not the payment is expected is similar to the major trauma payment.

The amount received relates to the care and support provided by your family. The amounts of family support benefit are stated in your insurance policy, and so may be considered as instalments of a capital lump sum, which are of a capital nature. Thus, the payment is not considered ordinary income and is therefore not assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.

Capital gains

Section 6-10 of the ITAA 1997 provides that amounts that are not ordinary income but are included in assessable income by another provision, are called statutory income and are also included in assessable income.

Taxation Ruling TR 95/35 indicates that settlement of a personal injuries claim represents the disposal of an asset, as the taxpayer has disposed of the right to seek compensation for the losses arising from the injury suffered. The disposal of an asset gives rise to a capital gains tax (CGT) event. However, paragraph 118-37(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 disregards the payments or receipts where the amount relates to compensation or damages a taxpayer received for any wrong, injury or illness a taxpayer suffered.

The payments received by you for trauma and family support benefit are not assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 as they are not ordinary income. The payments are also disregarded from CGT by the operation of paragraph 118-37(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997. Subsection 6-15(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that if an amount is not ordinary or statutory income it is not assessable income.

Therefore the trauma and family support benefits do not form part of your assessable income.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).