Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011817047154

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Subject: Definition of a hospital

Will a benefit provided to an employee be an exempt benefit under subsection 57A(4) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?

Answer

No.

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

You have been endorsed as a charitable institution.

You provided a copy of your Memorandum and Articles of Association.

You also provided details of your activities.

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 57A(4)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 paragraph 65J(5)

Will a benefit provided to an employee be an exempt benefit under subsection 57A(4) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?

Section 57A of the FBTAA provides that the benefits provided by certain employers will be exempt benefits.

Subsection 57A(4) of the FBTAA states:

For a benefit that is provided to an employee to be an exempt benefit under subsection 57A(4) the following conditions must be satisfied:

1. Are you a hospital?

The term 'hospital' is not defined in the FBTAA.

In the decision of Australian Hospital Care (Latrobe) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 105 FCR 20; [2000] FCA 1509 (Australian Hospital Care case) the issue concerned the meaning of the term 'public hospital' for the purposes of the Sales Tax (Exemptions and Classifications) Act 1992 was considered, and Merkel J stated at paragraph 41:

And further, in the Australian Hospital Care case, at paragraph 51:

In the absence of a legislative reference, it is therefore necessary to refer to the contemporary common understanding or ordinary meaning of the term 'hospital' as a question of fact, taking all circumstances into account.

The Australian Oxford Dictionary, 1999, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, defines 'hospital' as:

The Macquarie Dictionary [Multimedia], version 5.0.0, 01/10/01 defines a 'hospital' as:

In Padbury: Home of Peace for the Dying and Incurable v. Solicitor-General (1908) 7 CLR 680 (Padbury case),Griffith CJ stated:

Barton J stated in the Padbury case that:

The sense in which the word [hospital] is generally understood is, I think, that of an institution for those who, being sick or injured in body, are in need of medical or surgical aid.

The term 'hospital' was also considered in the case Public Trustee v. Hospitals Commissioner of New South Wales (1939) 56 Weekly Notes 198 at 199, 200 (Public Trustee case). The judgement states:

Based on the ordinary meaning of the term and precedent, an essential function of a hospital is the provision of medical or surgical treatment for sickness, disease or injury. In addition, the reason for the institution receiving the patient must be for the provision of medical care and treatment of that patient.

The provision of accommodation is also essential to an institution being a hospital. In Re Alfred Ford [1945] 1 All ER 288 it was stated:

In Salmar Holdings Pty Ltd v. Hornsby Shire Council [1971] 1 NSWLR 192 at 199 (Salmar case) where the definition of 'hospital' was considered, Jacobs JA stated:

The Salmar case supports the view that accommodation is an important part of a hospital's function.

Additional guidelines on what constitutes a hospital is provided in GiftPack - Guide for deductible gift recipients and donors which states:

In applying these extracts, it can be concluded that, to be a hospital, an institution must provide:

In considering your situation your principle objective is to educate the public about population growth and control. Although you also have objectives that include the provision of medical advice and assistance to persons who are suffering from physical or mental illness or distress as a result of involuntary sterility or of difficulties connected with the marriage relationship or sexual problems for which medical advice or treatment is appropriate and you conduct screening programs to detect early stages of treatable and preventable disease, the information provided does not indicate that you are an institution that is predominantly for the provision of medical care and treatment where accommodation is integral to the care and treatment.

In analysing the services that you provide:

Your situation is similar to the dental hospital considered in the Public Trustee case where Long Innes CJ at 200, stated:

Although you may have recovery beds, they are only used for a short period of time by some of your clients. Similarly, although some of your services may detect a sickness or disease, the patient may need to be referred elsewhere for treatment and many of your services do not involve the treatment of a sickness, disease or injury.

To be a hospital an institution must be predominantly for the provision of medical care and treatment where accommodation is integral to the care and treatment. On the basis of the above analysis, it is not possible to conclude that you satisfy this predominant requirement.

Therefore, you are not considered to be a hospital for the purposes of subsection 57A(4) of the FBTAA and the benefits provided to your employees will not be exempt benefits.

2. Are you are a non-profit society or association for the purposes of section 65J of the FBTAA?

The note to subsection 57A(4) refers to subsection 65J(5) of the FBTAA which states:

As you have been endorsed as a charitable institution it is accepted that paragraph (a) of this definition would be satisfied.

Further, it is also accepted that you are a company limited by guarantee where the interests and rights of the members are not beneficially owned by the Government or a Government authority or institution.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).